Amsden, Alice H. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York, 1989.Google Scholar

Bergère, Marie-Claire. The Golden Age of the Chinese Bourgeoisie, 1911–1937. New York, 1989.Google Scholar

Burt, Ronald S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, Mass., 1992.Google Scholar

Cochran, Sherman. Big Business in China: Sino-Foreign Rivalry in the Cigarette Industry, 1890–1930. Cambridge, Mass., 1980.Google Scholar

Dobbin, Frank. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge, U.K., 1994.Google Scholar

Dore, Ronald Philip. Flexible Rigidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy, 1970–80. Stanford, Calif., 1986.Google Scholar

Dore, Ronald Philip. Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism, Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford, U.K., 2000.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, N.J., 1995.Google Scholar

Fields, Karl J. Enterprise and the State in Korea and Taiwan. Ithaca, N.Y., 1995.Google Scholar

Fligstein, Neil. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass., 2005.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, U.K., 2001.Google Scholar

Herrigel, Gary. Industrial Constructions: The Sources of German Industrial Power. Cambridge, U.K., 1996.Google Scholar

Ibata-Arens, Kathryn. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Japan: Politics, Organizations, and High Technology Firms. Cambridge, U.K., 2005.Google Scholar

Imai, Kenichi. Benchaazu Infura [The Infrastructure of Venture Companies]. Tokyo, 1998.Google Scholar

Lin, Nan, Karen S. Cook, and Ronald S. Burt, eds. Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York, 2001.Google Scholar

Lipartito, Kenneth, and David B. Sicilia, eds. Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture. New York, 2004.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London, 1922.Google Scholar

Piore, Michael J., and Charles F. Sabel. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York, 1984.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. Boston, 1944.Google Scholar

Saxenian, AnnaLee. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass., 1994.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 4th ed. London, 1954.Google Scholar

Scott, James. The Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Haven, Conn., 1976.Google Scholar

Stopford, John M., and Susan Strange. Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares. Cambridge, U.K., 1991.Google Scholar

Yamamura, Kozo, and Wolfgang Streeck. The End of Diversity? Prospects for German and Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca, N.Y., 2003.Google Scholar

Zukin, Sharon, and Paul DiMaggio, eds. Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. New York, 1990.Google Scholar

Baker, Peter. “Spatial Outcomes of Capital Restructuring: ‘New Industrial Spaces’ as a Symptom of Crisis, Not Solution.” Review of Political Economy 8, no. 3 (1996): 263–78.Google Scholar

Culpepper, Pepper D. “Employers, Public Policy, and the Politics of Decentralized Cooperation in Germany and France.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, ed. Peter A. Hall and David Soskice. Oxford, U.K., 2001, pp. 275–306.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (April 1983): 147–60.Google Scholar

George, Alexander, and Timothy McKeown. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making.” In Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, ed. Robert Coulam and Richard Smith. London, 1985, pp. 21–58.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (Nov. 1985): 481–510.Google Scholar

Herrigel, Gary, and Charles Sabel. “Craft Production in Crisis.” In The German Skills Machine: Sustaining Comparative Advantage in a Global Economy, ed. Pepper D. Culpepper and David Finegold. New York, 1999, pp. 77–114.Google Scholar

Ibata-Arens, Kathryn. “The Comparative Political Economy of Innovation.” Review of International Political Economy 10, no. 1 (2003): 147–65.Google Scholar

Lamoreaux, Naomi, Daniel M. G. Raff, and Peter Temin. “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History.” American Historical Review 108 (April 2003): 404–33.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. “The Economy as an Instituted Process.” In Trade and Markets in the Early Empires, ed. Karl Polanyi, Conrad Arensberg, and Harry W. Pearson. Glencoe, Ill., 1957, pp. 243–70.Google Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen, and Ikuo Kume. “The Rise of Nonliberal Training Regimes: Germany and Japan Compared.” In Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison, ed. Wolfgang Streeck and Kozo Yamamura. Ithaca, N.Y., 2001, pp. 200–227.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past and Present 50 (Feb. 1971): 76–136.Google Scholar

Tolbert, Pamela, and Lynne Zucker. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (March 1983): 22–39.Google Scholar

Uzzi, Brian. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (March 1997): 35–67.Google Scholar

Uzzi, Brian. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61 (Aug. 1996): 674–98.Google Scholar

Zorn, Dirk. “Here a Chief, There a Chief: The Rise of the CFO in the American Firm.” American Sociological Review 69, no. 3 (2004): 345–64.Google Scholar