Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T01:26:31.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“The Fatal Blemish”: Purity, Consistency, and Chemical Engineers at the Origin of a New Visual Order, 1890–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2024

Abstract

This article follows the early history of the Eastman Kodak Company, examining how the photographic company came to be led by experts in chemistry, who created manufacturing processes that were crucial to the mass manufacture of motion pictures. It argues that celluloid film, the substance necessary for motion pictures, was central to the evolution of Kodak into an industrial chemical company. Kodak’s work to manage the specific technological problems and risks created by this material was itself constitutive of the new industrial shape the firm took. In embracing an intraplant goal of purity of raw materials and finished goods, Kodak made it possible for cinema to become a mass medium, with moving images able to look the same way across time and space, over countless copies. Kodak’s transformation, however, was uneven, as the firm’s photosensitive emulsion continued to be made according to far more empirical, secretive, and artisanal procedures, developed by a photographer without a high school degree. These artisanal processes coexisted alongside a highly standardized plant regime, and both were required to make celluloid film. This history demonstrates one way in which broad cultural transformations of the early twentieth century were closely tied to material and practical transformations within industrial firms.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Business History Conference

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Ackerman, Carl W. George Eastman. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1930.Google Scholar
Beniger, James R. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Blum, Deborah. The Poison Squad: One Chemist’s Single-Minded Crusade for Food Safety at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. New York: Penguin, 2018.Google Scholar
Braverman, Harry. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brayer, Elizabeth. George Eastman: A Biography. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Burstein, Daniel Eli. Next to Godliness: Confronting Dirt and Despair in Progressive Era New York City. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Cohen, William A., ed. Filth: Dirt, Disgust, and Modern Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Collins, Douglas. The Story of Kodak. New York: H.N. Abrams, 1990.Google Scholar
Coppin, Clayton A. and High, Jack. The Politics of Purity: Harvey Washington Wiley and the Origins of Federal Food Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronon, William. Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W. W. Norton, 1991.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Routledge, 1966, 2002.Google Scholar
Eastman Kodak Company v. Jacob Kleinhans, John B. Stobhaeus, Henry A. Weidig and Hugo L. Kleinhans . (EKC v. Kleinhans et. al.) NY Supreme Court. Appellate Division. 4th Department. Monroe County. August 19, 1903. Appeal Book on Appeal from Judgment. Rochester: E. E. Andrews Printing, 1904.Google Scholar
Eissler, Manuel. A Handbook on Modern Explosives: Being a Practical Treatise on the Manufacture and Application of Dynamite, Gun-cotton, Nitro-glycerine, and Other Explosive Compounds, Including the Manufacture of Collodion-cotton. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son, 1890.Google Scholar
Friedel, Robert D. Pioneer Plastic: The Making and Selling of Celluloid. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Fulton, Levi S. and Eastman, George W., A Practical System of Book-keeping by Single and Double Entry. New York: A.S. Barnes & Co., 1851.Google Scholar
Gilman, Arthur. The Cambridge of Eighteen Hundred and Ninety-six: A Picture of the City and Its Industries Fifty Years After Its Incorporation. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press, 1896.Google Scholar
Grieveson, Lee. Cinema and the Wealth of Nations: Media, Capital, and the Liberal World System. Oakland: University of California Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Williams, Haynes. Cellulose: The Chemical That Grows. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1953.Google Scholar
Haynes, Williams. Background and Beginnings . Vol. 1 of American Chemical Industry. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1954.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A., and Smith, John Kenly Jr. Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Reese. Images and Enterprise: Technology and the American Photographic Industry, 1839 to 1925. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jonathan. Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of Capitalism and Risk in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löhnert, Peter, and Mustroph, Heinz. Die Entwicklung der Produktion Photographischer Materialien: Der Aufbau und die Ersten Jahre der Filmfabrik Wolfen von der Gründung 1909 bis 1918. Wolfen, Germany: VEB Filmfabrik Wolfen, 1989.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Richard and Miller, Toby. Greening the Media. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Melosi, Martin V. The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from the Colonial Times to the Present. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney W. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Viking, 1985.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, Pap. Nylon and Bombs: Dupont and the March of Modern America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Parikka, Jussi. A Geology of Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, Scott A. Born Losers: A History of Failure in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carl. City Water, City Life: Water and the Infrastructure of Ideas in Urbanizing Philadelphia, Boston, and Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smither, Roger B. N., and Surowiec, Catherine A.. This Film is Dangerous: A Celebration of Nitrate Film. Brussels: FIAF, 2002.Google Scholar
Taft, Robert. Photography and the American Scene: A Social History, 1839–1889. New York: Macmillan, 1942.Google Scholar
Thomas, Courtney I.P. In Food We Trust: The Politics of Purity in American Food Regulation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Kristin. Exporting Entertainment: America in the World Film Market, 1907–34. London: BFI Publishing, 1985.Google Scholar
United States v. Eastman Kodak Company. (US v. EKC). US Circuit Court, Western District of New York, August 24, 1915, no. A–51. Appeal to US Supreme Court. Petition: March 8, 1916; withdrawn: February 1921. Abridged Transcript of Record.Google Scholar
White, Richard. Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America. New York: W.W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar
Young, James Harvey. Pure Food: Securing the Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Gerben. “How Motion Pictures Industrialized Entertainment.” The Journal of Economic History 72, no. 4 (2012): 10361063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bustamante, Carlos. “Agfa, Kullmann, Singer & Co. And Early Cine-Film Stock.” Film History: An International Journal 20, no. 1 (2008): 5976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calomaris, Charles W. and Schweikart, Larry. “The Panic of 1857: Origins, Transmission, and Containment.” Journal of Economic History 51, no. 4 (1991): 807834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Pansy. “Celluloid™: Cecil M. Hepworth, Trick Film, and the Material Prehistory of the Plastic Image.” Film History 31, no. 4 (2019): 92112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hounshell, David A.The Evolution of Industrial Research in the United States,” in Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research At the End of an Era, edited by Rosenbloom, Richard S., 1385. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, Daniel. “All That Is Solid Bursts into Flame: Capitalism and Fire in the Nineteenth-Century United States.” Past & Present. Published ahead of print, March 9, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtad019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30, no. 2 (2004): 225248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Guern, Nicholas. “Contribution of the European Kodak Research Laboratories to Innovation Strategy at Eastman Kodak.” Doctoral dissertation, Photographic History Research Centre, De Montfort University, 2017.Google Scholar
Link, Stefan, and Maggor, Noam. “The United States as a Developing Nation: Revisiting the Peculiarities of American History.” Past & Present 246, no. 1 (2020): 269306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Alice. “Celluloid Geopolitics: Film Stock and the War Economy, 1939–47.” Screen 60, no. 2 (2019): 224241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercelis, Joris. “‘Men Don’t Like to Work Under a Woman’: Female Chemists in the Photographic Manufacturing Industry, ca. 1918–1950.” Ambix 69, no. 3 (2022): 291319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, Michael. “The Development and Growth of British Photographic Manufacturing and Retailing 1839–1914.” Doctoral dissertation, Imaging and Communication Design, De Montfort University, 2010.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Terry S.Defining Professional Boundaries: Chemical Engineering in the Early 20th Century,” Technology and Culture 27, no. 4 (1986): 694716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Lissa. “The Death of the Sensuous Chemist: The ‘New’ Chemistry and the Transformation of Sensuous Technology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26, no. 4 (1995): 503529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Lorna. “Looking At Shirley, the Ultimate Norm: Colour Balance, Image Technologies, and Cognitive Equity.” Canadian Journal of Communication 34, no. 1 (2009): 111136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singerman, David Roth. “The Limits of Chemical Control in the Caribbean Sugar Factory.” Radical History Review 2017, no. 127 (2017): 3961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singerman, David Roth. “Inventing Purity in the Atlantic Sugar World, 1860–1930.” Enterprise & Society 16, no. 4 (2015): 780791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaton, Amy E.Introduction,” in New Materials: Towards a History of Consistency, edited by Slaton, Amy E., 136. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, Michelle. “‘An American Sun Shines Brighter’: Art, Science, and the American Reinvention of Photography.” Doctoral dissertation, History of Art, Bryn Mawr College, 2020.Google Scholar
Solares, Israel G., and Beatty, Edward. “Engineers & Corporate Management, ca 1870–1930: The Invisible Hand Redux.” Enterprise & Society 25, no. 2 (2024): 486511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spehr, Paul C.Unaltered to Date: Developing 35mm Film,” in Moving Images: From Edison to the Webcam, edited by Fullerton, John and Widding, Astrid Söderbergh, 327. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Sturchio, Jeffrey. “Festschrift: Experimenting with Research: Kenneth Mees, Eastman Kodak and the Challenges of Diversification.” Science Museum Group Journal no. 13 (2020): https://doi.org/10.15180/201311.Google Scholar
The Home of Kodak . Rochester, NY: Eastman Kodak Company, 1929.Google Scholar
The Home of The Kodak . Rochester, NY: Eastman Kodak Company, 1893?Google Scholar
Yue, Genevieve. “The China Girl on the Margins of Film.” October no. 153 (2015): 96116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Soap Journal & Manufacturing Chemist Google Scholar
The Cambridge Tribune Google Scholar
Motion Picture News Google Scholar
Bundesarchiv, Lichterfelde, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
George Eastman Museum, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Rare Books, Special Collections, and Preservation, River Campus Libraries, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Carl W. George Eastman. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1930.Google Scholar
Beniger, James R. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Blum, Deborah. The Poison Squad: One Chemist’s Single-Minded Crusade for Food Safety at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. New York: Penguin, 2018.Google Scholar
Braverman, Harry. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brayer, Elizabeth. George Eastman: A Biography. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Burstein, Daniel Eli. Next to Godliness: Confronting Dirt and Despair in Progressive Era New York City. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Cohen, William A., ed. Filth: Dirt, Disgust, and Modern Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Collins, Douglas. The Story of Kodak. New York: H.N. Abrams, 1990.Google Scholar
Coppin, Clayton A. and High, Jack. The Politics of Purity: Harvey Washington Wiley and the Origins of Federal Food Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronon, William. Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York: W. W. Norton, 1991.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Routledge, 1966, 2002.Google Scholar
Eastman Kodak Company v. Jacob Kleinhans, John B. Stobhaeus, Henry A. Weidig and Hugo L. Kleinhans . (EKC v. Kleinhans et. al.) NY Supreme Court. Appellate Division. 4th Department. Monroe County. August 19, 1903. Appeal Book on Appeal from Judgment. Rochester: E. E. Andrews Printing, 1904.Google Scholar
Eissler, Manuel. A Handbook on Modern Explosives: Being a Practical Treatise on the Manufacture and Application of Dynamite, Gun-cotton, Nitro-glycerine, and Other Explosive Compounds, Including the Manufacture of Collodion-cotton. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son, 1890.Google Scholar
Friedel, Robert D. Pioneer Plastic: The Making and Selling of Celluloid. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Fulton, Levi S. and Eastman, George W., A Practical System of Book-keeping by Single and Double Entry. New York: A.S. Barnes & Co., 1851.Google Scholar
Gilman, Arthur. The Cambridge of Eighteen Hundred and Ninety-six: A Picture of the City and Its Industries Fifty Years After Its Incorporation. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press, 1896.Google Scholar
Grieveson, Lee. Cinema and the Wealth of Nations: Media, Capital, and the Liberal World System. Oakland: University of California Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Williams, Haynes. Cellulose: The Chemical That Grows. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1953.Google Scholar
Haynes, Williams. Background and Beginnings . Vol. 1 of American Chemical Industry. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1954.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A., and Smith, John Kenly Jr. Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Reese. Images and Enterprise: Technology and the American Photographic Industry, 1839 to 1925. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jonathan. Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of Capitalism and Risk in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löhnert, Peter, and Mustroph, Heinz. Die Entwicklung der Produktion Photographischer Materialien: Der Aufbau und die Ersten Jahre der Filmfabrik Wolfen von der Gründung 1909 bis 1918. Wolfen, Germany: VEB Filmfabrik Wolfen, 1989.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Richard and Miller, Toby. Greening the Media. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Melosi, Martin V. The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from the Colonial Times to the Present. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney W. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Viking, 1985.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, Pap. Nylon and Bombs: Dupont and the March of Modern America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Parikka, Jussi. A Geology of Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, Scott A. Born Losers: A History of Failure in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carl. City Water, City Life: Water and the Infrastructure of Ideas in Urbanizing Philadelphia, Boston, and Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smither, Roger B. N., and Surowiec, Catherine A.. This Film is Dangerous: A Celebration of Nitrate Film. Brussels: FIAF, 2002.Google Scholar
Taft, Robert. Photography and the American Scene: A Social History, 1839–1889. New York: Macmillan, 1942.Google Scholar
Thomas, Courtney I.P. In Food We Trust: The Politics of Purity in American Food Regulation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Kristin. Exporting Entertainment: America in the World Film Market, 1907–34. London: BFI Publishing, 1985.Google Scholar
United States v. Eastman Kodak Company. (US v. EKC). US Circuit Court, Western District of New York, August 24, 1915, no. A–51. Appeal to US Supreme Court. Petition: March 8, 1916; withdrawn: February 1921. Abridged Transcript of Record.Google Scholar
White, Richard. Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America. New York: W.W. Norton, 2011.Google Scholar
Young, James Harvey. Pure Food: Securing the Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Gerben. “How Motion Pictures Industrialized Entertainment.” The Journal of Economic History 72, no. 4 (2012): 10361063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bustamante, Carlos. “Agfa, Kullmann, Singer & Co. And Early Cine-Film Stock.” Film History: An International Journal 20, no. 1 (2008): 5976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calomaris, Charles W. and Schweikart, Larry. “The Panic of 1857: Origins, Transmission, and Containment.” Journal of Economic History 51, no. 4 (1991): 807834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Pansy. “Celluloid™: Cecil M. Hepworth, Trick Film, and the Material Prehistory of the Plastic Image.” Film History 31, no. 4 (2019): 92112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hounshell, David A.The Evolution of Industrial Research in the United States,” in Engines of Innovation: U.S. Industrial Research At the End of an Era, edited by Rosenbloom, Richard S., 1385. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, Daniel. “All That Is Solid Bursts into Flame: Capitalism and Fire in the Nineteenth-Century United States.” Past & Present. Published ahead of print, March 9, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtad019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30, no. 2 (2004): 225248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Guern, Nicholas. “Contribution of the European Kodak Research Laboratories to Innovation Strategy at Eastman Kodak.” Doctoral dissertation, Photographic History Research Centre, De Montfort University, 2017.Google Scholar
Link, Stefan, and Maggor, Noam. “The United States as a Developing Nation: Revisiting the Peculiarities of American History.” Past & Present 246, no. 1 (2020): 269306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Alice. “Celluloid Geopolitics: Film Stock and the War Economy, 1939–47.” Screen 60, no. 2 (2019): 224241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercelis, Joris. “‘Men Don’t Like to Work Under a Woman’: Female Chemists in the Photographic Manufacturing Industry, ca. 1918–1950.” Ambix 69, no. 3 (2022): 291319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, Michael. “The Development and Growth of British Photographic Manufacturing and Retailing 1839–1914.” Doctoral dissertation, Imaging and Communication Design, De Montfort University, 2010.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Terry S.Defining Professional Boundaries: Chemical Engineering in the Early 20th Century,” Technology and Culture 27, no. 4 (1986): 694716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Lissa. “The Death of the Sensuous Chemist: The ‘New’ Chemistry and the Transformation of Sensuous Technology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26, no. 4 (1995): 503529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Lorna. “Looking At Shirley, the Ultimate Norm: Colour Balance, Image Technologies, and Cognitive Equity.” Canadian Journal of Communication 34, no. 1 (2009): 111136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singerman, David Roth. “The Limits of Chemical Control in the Caribbean Sugar Factory.” Radical History Review 2017, no. 127 (2017): 3961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singerman, David Roth. “Inventing Purity in the Atlantic Sugar World, 1860–1930.” Enterprise & Society 16, no. 4 (2015): 780791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaton, Amy E.Introduction,” in New Materials: Towards a History of Consistency, edited by Slaton, Amy E., 136. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, Michelle. “‘An American Sun Shines Brighter’: Art, Science, and the American Reinvention of Photography.” Doctoral dissertation, History of Art, Bryn Mawr College, 2020.Google Scholar
Solares, Israel G., and Beatty, Edward. “Engineers & Corporate Management, ca 1870–1930: The Invisible Hand Redux.” Enterprise & Society 25, no. 2 (2024): 486511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spehr, Paul C.Unaltered to Date: Developing 35mm Film,” in Moving Images: From Edison to the Webcam, edited by Fullerton, John and Widding, Astrid Söderbergh, 327. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Sturchio, Jeffrey. “Festschrift: Experimenting with Research: Kenneth Mees, Eastman Kodak and the Challenges of Diversification.” Science Museum Group Journal no. 13 (2020): https://doi.org/10.15180/201311.Google Scholar
The Home of Kodak . Rochester, NY: Eastman Kodak Company, 1929.Google Scholar
The Home of The Kodak . Rochester, NY: Eastman Kodak Company, 1893?Google Scholar
Yue, Genevieve. “The China Girl on the Margins of Film.” October no. 153 (2015): 96116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Soap Journal & Manufacturing Chemist Google Scholar
The Cambridge Tribune Google Scholar
Motion Picture News Google Scholar
Bundesarchiv, Lichterfelde, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
George Eastman Museum, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Rare Books, Special Collections, and Preservation, River Campus Libraries, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar