Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:44:08.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition, Collusion, and Confusion: The State and the Reorganization of the British Cotton Industry, 1931–1939

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Julian I. Greaves
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

British industrial policy in the 1930s has generated considerable historical controversy. This article furthers the debate by using the cotton industry as a case study. The biggest constraint on active government policies toward cotton was not institutional inertia or “industrial diplomacy,” as some historians claim, but the sheer practical difficulty of intervening in such a complex industry. Cotton also poses problems for historians who see British industrial policy in the 1930s as largely about restraining competition. The government feared that restriction would make matters worse in the cotton industry and was therefore hesitant about backing schemes designed to limit competition. Its dilemma was how best to maintain private-sector confidence.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 48 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2002. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Alford, Bernard W. E. Britain in the World Economy since 1880. London, 1996.Google Scholar
Allen, George C. British Industries and Their Organisation, 3d ed. London, 1951.Google Scholar
Bowker, B. Lancashire under the Hammer. London, 1928.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N. The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective. Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
Carr, James C., and Taplin, Walter. History of the British Steel Industry. Oxford, 1962.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Basudev. Trade, Tariffs, and Empire: Lancashire and British Policy in India, 1919–1939. Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Clay, Henry. Report on the Position of the English Cotton Industry. London, 1931.Google Scholar
Dupree, Marguerite, ed. Lancashire and Whitehall: The Diary of Sir Raymond Streat. 2 vols. Manchester, 1987, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Holland, Roy F. Britain and the Commonwealth Alliance, 1918-1939. London, 1981.Google Scholar
Howson, Susan, and Winch, Donald. The Economic Advisory Council, 1930-1939: A Study in Economic Advice during Depression and Recovery. Cambridge, 1977.Google Scholar
Huberman, Michael. Escape from the Market: Negotiating Work in Lancashire. Cambridge1, 1996.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Herbert. Tariff-Making and Industrial Reconstruction. London, 1965.Google Scholar
International Labour Office. The World Textile Industry. 2 vols. London, 1937, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Joint Committee of Cotton Trade Organisations. Lancashire and the Future. Privately printed, 1937.Google Scholar
Joint Committee of Cotton Trade Organisations . Lancashire’s Remedy. Privately printed, 1937.Google Scholar
Kirby, Maurice W. The British Coalmining Industry, 1870-1946: A Political Economic History. London, 1977.Google Scholar
Lewis, Ben W. Prices and Production Control in British Industry. Chicago, 1937.Google Scholar
Lindsay, T. F., and Harrington, Michael. The Conservative Party, 1918-1979. 2d ed. London, 1979.Google Scholar
Lucas, Arthur Fletcher. Industrial Reconstruction and the Control of Competition. London, 1937.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. Industry and Trade, 3d ed. rev., 1919; London, 1920.Google Scholar
Matthews, Robin C. O., Feinstein, Charles H., and Odling-Smee., John C. British Economic Growth, 1856-1973. Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar
Middleton, Roger. Government versus the Market: The Growth of the Public Sector, Economic Management, and British Economic Performance, c. 1890-1979. Cheltenham, U.K., 1996.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
Political and Economic Planning. Report on the British Cotton Industry. London, 1934.Google Scholar
Robson, Robert. The Cotton Industry in Britain. London, 1957.Google Scholar
Rooth, Tim. British Protectionism and the International Economy: Overseas Commercial Policy in the 1930s. Cambridge, 1993.Google Scholar
Sandberg, Lars. Lancashire in Decline: A Study in Entrepreneurship, Technology, and International Trade. Columbus, Ohio, 1974.Google Scholar
Singleton, John. Lancashire on the Scrapheap: The Cotton Industry, 1945-1970. Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
Supple, Barry. The History of the British Coal Industry, vol.4: 1913-46: The Political Economy of Decline. Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar
Tolliday, Steven W. Business, Banking, and Politics: The Case of British Steel, 1918-1939. Cambridge, Mass., 1987.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Jim. Government and the Enterprise since 1900: The Changing Problem of Efficiency. Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. Economics and Policy: A Historical Study. London, 1969.Google Scholar
Wisselink, Jan. The Concentration in the English Cotton Industry. Rotterdam, 1930.Google Scholar
Wurm, Clemens. Business, Politics, and International Relations: Steel, Cotton, and International Cartels in British Politics, 1924-1939. Cambridge, 1993. Google Scholar
Bamberg, James H. “The Rationalisation of the British Cotton Industry in the Interwar Years.” Textile History 19 (May 1988): 83–102.Google Scholar
Booth, Alan E. “Britain in the 1930s: A Managed Economy?” Economic History Review 40(Nov. 1987): 499–522.Google Scholar
Bowden, Sue, and Higgins, David M.. “Short-Time Working and Price Maintenance: Collusive Tendencies in the Cotton-Spinning Industry, 1919-1939.” Economic History Review 51 (May 1998): 319–43.Google Scholar
Bowden, Sue, and Higgins, David M.. “‘Productivity on the Cheap’? The ‘More Looms’ Experiment and the Lancashire Weaving Industry during the Inter-War Years.” Business History 41 (July 1999): 20–41.Google Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Crafts, Nicholas F. R.. “Britain’s Productivity Gap in the 1930s: Some Neglected Factors.” Journal of Economic History 52 (Sept. 1992): 531–58.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Ethel Barbara. “The Plight of the Lancashire Cotton Industry.” American Economic Review 18 (Sept. 1928): 468–76.Google Scholar
Dupree, Marguerite. “The Cotton Industry: A Middle Way between Nationalisation and Self-Government?” In Labour Governments and Private Industry: The Experience of 1945-51, ed. Mercer, Helen, Rollings, Neil, and Tomlinson, Jim. Edinburgh, 1992, pp. 137–61Google Scholar
Dupree, Marguerite. “Fighting against Fate: The Cotton Industry and the Government during the 1930s.” Textile History 21 (May 1990): 101–17.Google Scholar
Dupree, Marguerite. “Foreign Competition and the Interwar Period.” In The Lancashire Cotton Industry: A History since 1700, ed. Rose, Mary B.. Preston, U.K., 1996, pp. 265–95.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, James. “Industry and Industrial Organisation in the Inter-War Years.” In The Economic History of Britain since 1700, vol. 2: 1860-1939, ed. Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, D. N.. 2d ed. Cambridge, 1994, pp.386–414.Google Scholar
Fowler, Alan. “Lancashire Cotton Trade Unionism in the Inter-War Years.” In Employers and Labour in the English Textile Industries, 1850-1939, ed. Jowitt, J. A. and McIvor, Arthur J.. London, 1988, pp. 107–26.Google Scholar
Garside, W. R., and Greaves, Julian I.. “The Bank of England and Industrial Intervention in Interwar Britain.” Financial History Review 3 (April 1996):69–86.Google Scholar
Garside, W. R., and Greaves, Julian I.. “Rationalisation and Britain’s Industrial Malaise: The Interwar Years Revisited.” Journal of European Economic History 26 (Spring 1997):37–61.Google Scholar
Greaves, Julian I. “‘Visible Hands’ and the Rationalization of the British Cotton Industry, 1925-1932.” Textile History 31 (May 2000): 102–22.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. “The State and Economic Decline.” In The Decline of the British Economy, ed. Elbaum, Bernard and William Lazonick, . Oxford, 1986, pp. 266–302.Google Scholar
Hughes, H. G., and Saunders, C. T.. “The Cotton Industry.” In Britain in Recovery, ed. British Association. London, 1938, pp. 441–59.Google Scholar
Kirby, Maurice W. “The Lancashire Cotton Industry in the Inter-War Years: A Study in Organisational Change.” Business History 16 (1974): 145–59.Google Scholar
Lazonick, William. “Industrial Organisation and Technological Change: The Decline of the British Cotton Industry.” Business History Review 57 (Summer 1983): 195–236.Google Scholar
Lowe, Rodney, and Roberts, Richard. “Sir Horace Wilson, 1900-1935: The Making of a Mandarin.” Historical Journal 30 (1987): 641–62.Google Scholar
Mass, William, and Lazonick, William. “The British Cotton Industry and International Competitive Advantage: The State of the Debates.” Business History 32 (Oct. 1990): 9-65Google Scholar
Roberts, Richard. “The Administrative Origins of Industrial Diplomacy: An Aspect of Government-Industry Relations, 1929-1935.” In Businessmen and Politics: Studies of Business Activity in British Politics, 1900-1945, ed. Turner, John. London, 1984, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
Ryan, J. “Combinations in the Cotton Trade.” Journal of the National Federation of Textile Works Managers’ Associations 8 (1928-1929): 20–29.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Gary R., and Wright, Gavin. “Stubborn Mules and Vertical Integration: The Disappearing Constraint?” Economic History Review 40(Feb. 1987): 87–94.Google Scholar
Singleton, John. “Debating the Nationalisation of the Cotton Industry, 191850.” In The Political Economy of Nationalisation in Britain, 1920-1950, ed. Millward, Robert and Singleton, John. Cambridge, 1995, pp. 212–36.Google Scholar
Stewart, K. D. “The Cotton Trade.” Nineteenth Century 107 (1930): 469–79.Google Scholar
Streat, Raymond. “The Cotton Industry in Contraction: Problems and Policies of the Inter-War Years.” District Bank Review (Sept. 1958), 1–20.Google Scholar
Von, Tunzelman, G. N. “Structural Change and Leading Sectors in British Manufacturing, 1907-68.” In Economics in the Long View: Essays in Honour of W. W. Rostow, ed. Kindleberger, Charles P. and Tella, Guido Di. 3 vols. London, 1982, vol. 3, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Economist. 1928-1939.Google Scholar
House of Commons. Debates, vols. 227-349, 1929-1939.Google Scholar
Times. 1934-1935.Google Scholar
Board of Trade. Working Party Reports, Cotton. London, 1946.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers. Board of Trade. Proposals for Legislation on the Reorganisation of the Cotton Industry. 1938-1939, vol. 21, Cmd. 5935.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers. Committee on Industry and Trade (Balfour Committee). Final Report. 1928-1929, vol. 7, Cmd. 3282.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers. Cotton Spinning Industry Act, 1936. Third Annual Report of the Spindles Board. 1939-1940, vol. 4, Cmd. 6157.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers. Report of the Departmental Committee Appointed to Consider the Position of the Textile Trades after the War. 1918, vol. 13, Cd. 9070.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers. Report of the Economic Advisory Council Committee on the Cotton Industry. 1929-1930, vol. 12, Cmd. 3615Google Scholar
Cotton Industry (Reorganisation) Act, 1939, Public General Acts, 1938-9, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Cotton Spinning Industry Act, 1936, Public General Acts, 1935-6, vol. 1.Google Scholar
Bamberg, James H. “The Government, the Banks, and the Lancashire Cotton Industry, 1918-39.” Ph.D. diss., University of Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
Bank of England Archives. Bankers’ Industrial Development Company Papers, 1.Google Scholar
Bank of England Archives. Securities Management Trust Papers, 2, 9.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D. E. H. “State Intervention in British Manufacturing Industry, 1931-1951: A Comparative Study of Policy for the Military Aircraft and Cotton Textile Industries.” Ph.D. diss., University of London, 1986.Google Scholar
Greaves, Julian I. “Industrial Rationalisation and Government Policy in Inter-war Britain.” Ph.D. diss., University of Birmingham, 1992.Google Scholar
Neville Chamberlain Papers, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Public Record Office, London. Board of Trade Papers, 55, 56, 64, 197.Google Scholar
Public Record Office. Cabinet Office Papers, 23, 24, 58.Google Scholar
Public Record Office. Treasury Papers, 172.Google Scholar
Roberts, Richard. “The Board of Trade, 1925-1939.” Ph.D. diss., University of Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar