Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:22:24.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of T-glottalling among adolescents in South East England

A sign of ‘chavviness’, or a key to ‘coolness’?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2020

Roy Alderton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sociolinguistic research has established that glottal realisations of the voiceless alveolar stop /t/ have become increasingly common in accents of British English. The phenomenon, known as T-glottalling, encompasses the production of word-final and word-medial /t/ using glottal articulations, including creaky voice, pre-glottalisation [ʔt] and glottal replacement [ʔ] (Straw & Patrick, 2007), so that words such as but [bʌt] and butter [bʌtə] may become [bʌʔ] and [bʌʔə] respectively. The change has been documented for some time in Scotland (Macafee, 1997) and Norfolk (Trudgill, 1999) but has since been reported in numerous locations across the UK (see Smith & Holmes–Elliott, 2018 for a recent review). Studies of regional dialect levelling (Kerswill, 2003) have argued that T-glottalling has spread from working-class London speech into neighbouring varieties of South East England and beyond as a form of geographical diffusion (Altendorf & Watt, 2004). Together with other variables showing similar sociolinguistic patterns, such as TH-fronting and L vocalisation, it has been identified as part of a set of ‘youth norms’ used by young people in many urban centres to index a trendy, youthful identity (Williams & Kerswill, 1999; Milroy, 2007; though see Watson, 2006 for an exception in Liverpool), which have elsewhere been referred to as ‘Estuary English’ (Rosewarne, 1984; Altendorf, 2017). In terms of perception, T-glottalling is described as highly salient and stigmatised, frequently attracting comments from lay speakers to the effect that it should be avoided (Wells, 1982; Bennett, 2012), to the extent that mainstream journalistic publications can identify and criticise its use by ‘educated’ speakers such as politicians (e.g. Littlejohn, 2011).

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 36 , Special Issue 3: Special Issue: Language in the South of England , September 2020 , pp. 40 - 47
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderton, R. 2019. ‘Salience and social meaning in speech production and perception.’ PhD thesis. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Altendorf, U. 2017. ‘Estuary English.’ In Bergs, A. & Brinton, L. (eds.), The History of English. Volume 5: Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 169–186.Google Scholar
Altendorf, U. & Watt, D. 2004. ‘The dialects in the South of England: Phonology.’ In Kortmann, B. & Schneider, E. W. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English. Volume 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 178–203.Google Scholar
Badia Barrera, B. 2015. ‘A sociolinguistic study of T-glottalling in young RP: Accent, class and education.’ PhD thesis. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Bayard, D., Weatherall, A., Gallois, C. & Pittam, J. 2001. ‘Pax Americana? Accent attitudinal evaluations in New Zealand, Australia and America.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(1), 22–49.10.1111/1467-9481.00136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. 2012. ‘“And what comes out may be a kind of screeching”: The stylisation of chavspeak in contemporary Britain.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(1), 5–27.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00521.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. 2010. White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell–Kibler, K. 2007. ‘Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions.’ American Speech, 82(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell–Kibler, K. 2009. ‘The nature of sociolinguistic perception.’ Language Variation and Change, 21(1), 135–156.10.1017/S0954394509000052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deterding, D. 2006. ‘The North Wind versus a Wolf: Short texts for the description and measurement of English pronunciation.’ Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 36(2), 187–196.10.1017/S0025100306002544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, K. 2015. Linguistic Variation, Identity Construction and Cognition. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. 2008. ‘Variation and the indexical field.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. 2012. ‘Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation.’ Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, A. 2000. ‘T-glottalling between stigma and prestige: A sociolinguistic study of modern RP.’ PhD thesis. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
Fabricius, A. 2002. ‘Ongoing change in modern RP: Evidence for the disappearing stigma of t-glottalling.’ English World-Wide, 23(1), 115–136.10.1075/eww.23.1.06fabCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, P., Coupland, N. & Williams, A. 2003. Investigating Language Attitudes: Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity and Performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H. 1970. ‘Evaluative reactions to accents.’ Educational Review, 22(3), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P. 2003. ‘Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English.’ In Britain, D. & Cheshire, J. (eds.), Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 223–243.10.1075/impact.16.16kerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, S. & Moore, E. 2016. ‘Constructing social meaning in political discourse: Phonetic variation and verb processes in Ed Miliband's speeches.’ Language in Society, 45(1), 87–111.10.1017/S0047404515000755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, T. 2011. ‘Attitudes, ideology and awareness.’ In Wodak, R., Johnstone, B., & Kerswill, P. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics. London: SAGE, pp. 265–278.10.4135/9781446200957.n20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levon, E. 2014. ‘Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality.’ Language in Society, 43(5), 539–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlejohn, R. 2011. ‘If Dave wants Wyatt Earp as Met chief, it's his call.’ Daily Mail, August 15. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2026382/If-David-Cameron-wants-Wyatt-Earp-Met-chief-call.htmlGoogle Scholar
Macafee, C. 1997. ‘Ongoing change in modern Scots: The social dimension.’ In Jones, C. (ed.), The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 514–548.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. 2001. ‘The social categories of race and class: Language ideology and sociolinguistics.’ In Coupland, N., Sarangi, S. & Candlin, C. N. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Social Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 235–260.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. 2007. ‘Off the shelf or under the counter? On the social dynamics of sound changes.’ In Cain, C. M. & Russom, G. (eds.), Managing Chaos: Strategies for Identifying Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 149–172.Google Scholar
Nesdale, D. & Rooney, R. 1996. ‘Evaluations and stereotyping of accented speakers by pre-adolescent children.’ Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(2), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2018a. ‘chav, n.’ Online at <http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/264253> (Accessed December 4, 2018.).+(Accessed+December+4,+2018.).>Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2018b. ‘lad, n.1.’ Online at <http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/104972> (Accessed December 4, 2018.).+(Accessed+December+4,+2018.).>Google Scholar
Pharao, N., Maegaard, M., Møller, J. S. & Kristiansen, T. 2014. ‘Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts.’ Language in Society, 43(1), 1–31.10.1017/S0047404513000857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosewarne, D. 1984. ‘Estuary English.’ Times Educational Supplement, 19 October.Google Scholar
Schleef, E. 2017. ‘Social meanings across listener groups: When do social factors matter?’ Journal of English Linguistics, 45(1), 28–59.10.1177/0075424216686149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. & Holmes–Elliott, S. 2018. ‘The unstoppable glottal: Tracking rapid change in an iconic British variable.’ English Language and Linguistics, 22(3), 323–355.10.1017/S1360674316000459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straw, M. & Patrick, P. L. 2007. ‘Dialect acquisition of glottal variation in /t/: Barbadians in Ipswich.’ Language Sciences, 29(2), 385–407.10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1999. ‘Norwich: Endogenous and exogenous linguistic change.’ In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold, pp. 124–140.Google Scholar
Watson, K. 2006. ‘Phonological resistance and innovation in the North-West of England.’ English Today, 22(2), 55–61.10.1017/S0266078406002100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. & Kerswill, P. 1999. ‘Dialect levelling: Change and continuity in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull.’ In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. J. (eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar