Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:03:41.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nativization of English in the Korean context: Uncharted territory for World Englishes

Investigating emerging patterns of Koreanized English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2014

Sofia Rüdiger
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years it has become increasingly popular to study Englishes in countries traditionally belonging to the Expanding Circle of World Englishes, such as China (see e.g. He & Li, 2009), Russia (see e.g. Davydova, 2012) or the Netherlands (Edwards, 2010, 2011). South Korea (henceforth Korea) belongs to the Expanding Circle as well, which means that English has the official status of a foreign language. Active use of English among Koreans themselves is limited but English has a very prestigious status in Korean society. In the following discussion, the sociolinguistic situation in Korea will be introduced, with a special focus on the status of English. Using data from a pilot corpus, I will argue for the development of several patterns of Koreanized English which seem to be partly influenced by the Korean language but are also possible results of the language learning process in general and idiosyncratic features.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 11 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baik, M. J. 1994. ‘Syntactic features of Englishization in Korean.’ World Englishes, 13(2), 155–166.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, S. 2013. English in Cyprus or Cyprus English – An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Davydova, J. 2012. ‘Englishes in the Outer and Expanding Circles: a comparative study.’ World Englishes, 31(3), 366–385.Google Scholar
Demick, B. 2002. ‘Some in S. Korea opt for a trim when English trips the tongue.’ Los Angeles Times. Online at http://articles.latimes.com/2002/mar/31/news/mn-35590 (Accessed May 7, 2013).Google Scholar
Edwards, A. 2010. ‘Dutch English: tolerable, taboo, or about time too?’ English Today, 26(1), 19–25.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. 2011. ‘Introducing the corpus of Dutch English.’ English Today, 27(3), 10–14.Google Scholar
He, D. & Li, D. C. S. 2009. ‘Language attitudes and linguistic features in the ‘China English’ debate.’ World Englishes, 28(1), 70–89.Google Scholar
Jung, S. K. & Norton, B. 2002. ‘Language planning in Korea: the New Elementary English Program.’ In Tollefson, J. W. (ed.), Language Policies in Education: Critical Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 245–265.Google Scholar
Kim, W. 2008. Globalization and the Diaspora of English – The Conceptualization of English in South Korea in the Era of Globalization. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. C. Jr. 2012. ‘Obama praises U.S. troops’ legacy in South Korea.’ Online at <http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=67675> (Accessed August 19, 2013).+(Accessed+August+19,+2013).>Google Scholar
Mollin, S. 2007. ‘New variety or learner English? Criteria for variety status and the case of Euro English.’ World Englishes, 28(2), 167–185.Google Scholar
Nahm, A. C. 1993. Introduction to Korean History and Culture. Seoul: Hollym.Google Scholar
Park, J. S. 2009. The Local Construction of a Global Language – Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Park, J. S. 2013. ‘English, class and neoliberalism in South Korea.’ In Wee, L., Goh, R. B.H. & Lim, L. (eds.), The Politics of English – South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Asia Pacific. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 287–302.Google Scholar
Platt, J., Weber, H. & Ho, M. L. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. 2012. ‘Shared features in New Englishes.’ In Raymond, R. (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 211–232.Google Scholar
Shim, R. J. 1994. ‘Englishized Korean: structure, status, and attitudes.’ World Englishes, 13(2), 225–244.Google Scholar
Shim, R. J. 1999. ‘Codified Korean English: process, characteristics and consequence.’ World Englishes, 18(2), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shim, R. J. & Baik, M. J. 2004. ‘Korea (South and North).’ In Kam, H.W. & Wong, R. Y. L. (eds.), Language Policies and Language Education: The Impact in East Asian Countries in the Next Decade. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, pp. 172–193.Google Scholar
Shim, D. & Park, J. S. 2008. ‘The language politics of ‘English fever’ in South Korea.’ Korea Journal, 48(2), 136–159.Google Scholar
Yeon, J. & Brown, L. 2011. Korean – A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar