Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:14:12.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is English a threat to Chinese language and culture?

The ‘threat’ of English in China might be balanced by the promotion of Chinese language and culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2012

Extract

In an article published in English Today in 2005, Niu and Woolf contend that:

EFL is a modern day Trojan horse filled with EFL teachers/soldiers or missionaries, armed with English words rather than bullets, intent upon re-colonizing the world to remake it in the image of Western democracy. China has brought the Trojan Horse within its gates and the army of EFL teachers is hard at work Westernizing China.

Type
Original Article

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

An, Z. 1984. ‘Ideological contamination clarified.’ Beijing Review, 27(4), 561–77.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2004. ‘Rights in places: Comments on linguistic rights and wrongs.’ In Patrick, J. F. D. (ed.), Language Rights and Language Survival. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing, pp. 5565.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2008. ‘Notes on power.’ Working Paper in Language Diversity, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Bolton, K. 2006. Chinese Englishes: a Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cai, X. L. 2006. ‘Critical thoughts on the whole nation studies English’ [Dui quan min ying yu re de leng si kao]. Journal of Higher Correspondence Education, 1, 30–1.Google Scholar
Cooke, D. 1988. ‘Ties that constrict: English as a Trojan horse.’ In Cumming, A., Gagné, A. & Dawson, J. (eds), Awareness: Proceedings of the 1987 TESL Ontario Conference. Ontario: TESL Ontario, pp. 5662.Google Scholar
Day, R. R. 1985. ‘The ultimate inequality: linguistic genocide.’ In Wolfson, N. and Manes, J. (eds), The Language of Inequality. Amsterdam: Mouton, pp. 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graddol, D. 2006. English Next: Why Global English may Mean the End of ‘English as a Foreign Language’. Plymouth: British Council.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Hanban, 2010. ‘Confucius Institutes and classrooms: an introduction.’ (Guanyu Kongzi Xueyuan he Kongzi Ketang.) Online at <www.hanban.edu.cn> (Accessed March 3, 2012).+(Accessed+March+3,+2012).>Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. J. 2003. ‘English as a Chinese language.’ English Today, 19(2), 38.Google Scholar
Judd, E. 1983. ‘TESOL as a political act: a moral question.’ In Handscombe, J., Orem, R. & Taylor, B. (eds), On TESOL'83. Washington DC: TESOL, pp. 265–73.Google Scholar
Niu, Q. & Wolff, M. 2005. ‘Is EFL a modern Trojan Horse?English Today, 21(4), 5560.Google Scholar
Pan, L. 2011. ‘English language ideologies in the Chinese foreign language education policies: a world-system perspective.’ Language Policy, 10, 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 1995. Papers in European Language Policy. ROLIG papir 53. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitets center, Lingvistgruppen.Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. 2012. Exploring World Englishes: Language in a Global Context. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sonntag, S. K. 2003. The Local Politics of Global English: Case Studies in Linguistic Globalization. Oxford: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Yue, P. 1983. ‘Preventing ideological pollution.’ Beijing Review, 24(22), 1236–50.Google Scholar
Zhou, C. Q. 2007. ‘Global Englishes: a challenge for English pedagogy in China.’ Journal of English as an International Language, 2, 82102.Google Scholar