Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:08:27.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The HUGE presence of Lindley Murray

An illustration of the scope of Lindley Murray's authority on all things prescriptive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2018

Lyda Fens–De Zeeuw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The grammarian Lindley Murray (1745–1826), according to Monaghan (1996), was the author of the best selling English grammar book of all times, called English Grammar and first published in 1795. Not surprisingly, therefore, his work was subjected to severe criticism by later grammarians as well as by authors of usage guides, who may have thought that Murray's success might negatively influence the sales figures of their own books. As the publication history of the grammar in Alston (1965) suggests, Murray was also the most popular grammarian of the late 18th and perhaps the entire 19th century, and this is most clearly reflected in the way in which a wide range of 19th- and even some 20th-century literary authors, from both sides of the Atlantic, mentioned Lindley Murray in their novels. Examples are Harriet Beecher Stowe (Uncle Tom's Cabin, 1852), George Eliot (Middlemarch, 1871–2), Charles Dickens, in several of his novels (Sketches by Boz, 1836; Nicholas Nickleby, 1838–9; The Old Curiosity Shop 1840–1; Dombey & Son, 1846–8); Oscar Wilde (Miner and Minor Poets, 1887) and James Joyce (Ulysses, 1918) (Fens–de Zeeuw, 2011: 170–2). Another example is Edgar Allen Poe, who according to Hayes (2000) grew up with Murray's textbooks and used his writings as a kind of linguistic touchstone, especially in his reviews. Many more writers could be mentioned, and not only literary ones, for in a recent paper in which Crystal (2018) analysed the presence of linguistic elements in issues of Punch published during the 19th century, he discovered that ‘[w]henever Punch debates grammar, it refers to Lindley Murray’. Murray, according to Crystal, ‘is the only grammarian to receive any mention throughout the period, and his name turns up in 19 articles’ (Crystal, 2018: 86). Murray had become synonymous with grammar prescription, and even in the early 20th century, he was still referred to as ‘the father of English Grammar’ (Johnson, 1904: 365).

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 34 , Special Issue 4: “Bridging the Unbridgeable”: Special Issue on Prescriptivism , December 2018 , pp. 54 - 61
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Ingrid Tieken–Boon van Ostade for her contribution to this paper.

References

Alston, R. C. 1965. A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vol. 1. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar
Anon. 1859. ‘Ladies’ Maids and Lindley Murray.’ Punch, 37, 66.Google Scholar
Anon. 1866. [no title]. Harper's Weekly, 7/7, 427.Google Scholar
Barr, B. 1996. ‘Towards a bibliography of Lindley Murray.’ In Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. (ed.), Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray. Münster: Nodus Publikationen, pp. 217–29.Google Scholar
Batko, A. 2004. When Bad Grammar Happens to Good People: How to Avoid Common Errors in English. Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press.Google Scholar
Bell, W. J. 1951. ‘Thomas Parke's student life in England and Scotland, 1771–1773.’ Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 75(3), 237–59.Google Scholar
Brown, G. 1823. Institutes of English Grammar (1856, new stereotype edn.) New York: Samuel S. & William Wood.Google Scholar
Brown, G. 1832. ‘Critical observations on Murray's grammars.’ Annals of Education, Nov. 1 & 15, 557–64.Google Scholar
Brown, G. 1851. The Grammar of English Grammars. New York: Samuel S. & William Wood.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. 1996. Fowler's Modern English Usage (3rd edn.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1984. Who Cares About English Usage? An Entertaining Guide to the Common Problems of English Usage. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2018. ‘Punch as a satirical usage guide.’ In Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. (ed.), English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
Downey, C. 1982. ‘Introduction’. In Brown, G., The Institutes of English Grammar (1823). Delmar, NY: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.Google Scholar
Fens–de Zeeuw, L. 2011. Lindley Murray (1745–1826), Quaker and Grammarian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Finegan, E. 1980. Attitudes toward English Usage: The History of a War of Words. New York/London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, E. W. (ed.) 1989. Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Hayes, K. J. 2000. Poe and the Printed Word. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heffer, S. 2010. Strictly English: The Correct Way to Write … and Why It Matters. London: Random House.Google Scholar
HUGE: Hyper Usage Guide of English Database, The. Leiden University Centre for Linguistics. Online at <http://huge.ullet.net/> (Accessed May 24, 2017).+(Accessed+May+24,+2017).>Google Scholar
Hurd, S. T. 1847. A Grammatical Corrector; or, Vocabulary of the Common Errors of Speech. Philadelphia: E. H. Butler & Co.Google Scholar
Ikeda, M. 1999. Competing Grammars: Noah Webster's Vain Efforts to Defeat Lindley Murray. Tokyo: Shinozaki Shorin.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. 1904. Old-Time Schools and School-Books. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Lowth, R. 1763. A Short Introduction to English Grammar (2nd edn.) London: A. Millar, R. & J. Dodsley.Google Scholar
Monaghan, C. 1996. ‘Lindley Murray, American.’ In Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. (ed.), Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray. Münster: Nodus Publikationen, pp. 27–44.Google Scholar
Moody, P. A. 1976. ‘The American grammatical revolution.’ The English Journal, 65(9), 32–6.Google Scholar
Moon, G. W. 1868. The Bad English of Lindley Murray and Other Writers, A Series of Criticisms. London: Hatchard and Co.Google Scholar
Murray, L. 1795. English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. York: Wilson, Spence & Mawman.Google Scholar
Murray, L. 1826. Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Lindley Murray: In a Series of Letters, Written by Himself. With a Preface and a Continuation of the Memoirs, by E. Frank. York: Thomas Wilson & Sons; London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, & Green, Harvey & Darton.Google Scholar
Noordegraaf, J. 1996. ‘Murray's Dutch mirror: On rewriting the English Grammar.’ In Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. (ed.), Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray. Münster: Nodus Publikationen, pp. 107–23.Google Scholar
Postlethwaite, R. 1795. Grammatical Art Improved: In which the Errors of Grammarians and Lexicographers are Exposed. London: J. Parsons.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. 2005. ‘Don't put up with usage abuse.’ Language Log. Online at <http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001803.html> (Accessed November 11, 2016).+(Accessed+November+11,+2016).>Google Scholar
Reibel, D. A. 1996. ‘Introduction.’ In Reibel, D. A. (ed.), Lindley Murray (1745–1826): The Educational Works, English Grammar Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. Lindley Murray. London: Routledge, pp. v–xxiii.Google Scholar
Straaijer, R. 2014. Hyper Usage Guide of English. Online at <http://huge.ullet.net/> (Accessed June 19, 2018).+(Accessed+June+19,+2018).>Google Scholar
Straaijer, R. 2018. ‘The usage guide: evolution of a genre.’ In Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. (ed.), English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. 2006. ‘Eighteenth-century prescriptivism and the norm of correctness.’ In van Kemenade, A. & Los, B. (eds.), The Handbook of the History of English. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 539–57.Google Scholar
Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. 2011. The Bishop's Grammar. Robert Lowth and the Rise of Prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. 2014. ‘Eighteenth-century English normative grammars and their readers.’ In Rutten, G., Vosters, R. & Vandenbussche, W. (eds.), Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 129–50.Google Scholar
Vorlat, E. 1959. ‘The sources of Lindley Murray's “The English Grammar”’. Leuvense Bijdragen, 48:108–25.Google Scholar
Webster, N. 1784. A Grammatical Institute of the English Language. Hartford: Hudson & Goodwin.Google Scholar
Yáñez–Bouza, N. 2008. ‘Preposition stranding in the eighteenth century: Something to talk about.’ In Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 251–77.Google Scholar