Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:26:49.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How snuck sneaked into English and drug is still dragging behind: A corpus study on the usage of new past tense forms for sneak and drag in British and American English

Tracking diachronic changes in usage across different varieties of English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2014

Camilla Søballe Horslund
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Language observers may have noticed the existence of two past tense forms for the verb to sneak in American English, sneaked and snuck. Interestingly, both forms have not always coexisted; the original form is sneaked, and snuck has only recently become a real competitor for sneaked (Hogg, 1988: 31–32). The verb to drag seems to be somewhat in the same situation with the original past tense form dragged as well as the new form drug (Bybee & Moder, 1983: 252). However, drug is much less frequent than snuck. Murray's (1998) study on the attitudes towards snuck and drug suggests some difference in the usage of these forms across registers.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 51 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernstein, C. 1994. ‘Drug usage among high-school students in Silsbee, Texas: a study of the preterite.’ In Little, G. D. & Montgomery, M. (eds.), Centennial Usage Studies. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 144–154.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. & Moder, C.L. 1983. ‘Morphological classes as natural categories.’ Linguistic Society of America, 59(2), 251–270.Google Scholar
Creswell, T. J. 1994. ‘Dictionary recognition of developing forms: the case of snuck.’ In Little, G. D. & Montgomery, M. (eds.), Centennial Usage Studies. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 144–154.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. 1996. The Oxford English Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. M. 1988. ‘Snuck: the development of irregular preterite forms.’ In Nixon, G. (ed.) An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
Murray, T. E. 1998. ‘More on drug/dragged and snuck/sneaked: evidence from the American Midwest.’ Journal of English Linguistics, 26, 209–220.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. & Weiner, E. 2010. Oxford English Dictionary. Online at <http://www.oed.com/> (Accessed April 3, 2012).+(Accessed+April+3,+2012).>Google Scholar
Strang, B. M. H. 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. 1994. ‘Variation in past tense formation in the history of English.’ University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 143–158.Google Scholar
Turnbull, J., Lea, D., Parkinson, D., Phillips, P., Francis, B., Webb, S., Bull, V. & Ashby, M. (eds.). 2010. Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary. Online at <http://oald8.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/> (Accessed April 3, 2012).+(Accessed+April+3,+2012).>Google Scholar