Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:31:32.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Homogeneity and heterogeneity in the pronunciation of English among Ugandans

A preliminary study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2020

Extract

English is an official language in Uganda and is said to be in its nativization phase when placed within Schneider's (2007) model of the trajectorial development of Englishes (Isingoma & Meierkord, 2019). In the present study, we delineate the general features of the Ugandan accent of English (i.e. those that cut across regional or ethnic boundaries) as well as features that evince variability among Ugandans due to regional or ethnic background. The first description of the phonological features of the variety of English spoken in Uganda is included in Fisher's (2000) seminal paper on this L2 (second language) variety of English. Another description of these features is found in Nassenstein (2016). Both Fisher (2000) and Nassenstein (2016) provide a short section, outlining the features which are similar to the general features of L2 Englishes, notably the restructuring of the phonemic system, e.g. /a/ replacing /ɜ:, ɑ:, ʌ, ə/ and the free variation of [l] and [r], although the latter occurs regionally (see similar findings on L2 varieties of English in Bailey & Görlach [eds.] 1984; Platt, Weber & Ho, 1984; Schmied, 1991; Simo-Bobda, 2000; Atechi, 2004; Schneider et al. [eds.], 2004; Tsilimos, 2018; among others). Additionally, Simo-Bobda (2001) and Schmied (2004) describe more or less the same features but in a more detailed way under the label ‘East African English’ (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania). Schmied (2004) posits three reasons that underlie the features in question: substrate influence, simplification and spelling pronunciation. To these studies, we add a more focused study on one particular aspect of the Ugandan accent(s) of English, namely by Meierkord (2016), who looks at diphthongs and how they are realized by speakers of different L1s. Her findings demonstrate variability but also convergence in the idiomorphic pronunciation of diphthongs by Ugandans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adokorach, M. 2018. ‘Pronunciation differences between British English and English as spoken in Uganda.’ Unpublished BA dissertation. Gulu: Gulu University.Google Scholar
Akabway, S. B, Alowo, J., Kiganda, R. M. C., Nsibambi, J. R. & Rugambwa, O. 1996. Integrated English: A Course for Ugandan Secondary Schools – Student's Book 4. London: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Amone, C. 2014. ‘The creation of Acholi Military Ethnocracy in Uganda, 1862–1962.International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 2(3), 141150.Google Scholar
Atechi, N. S. 2004. ‘The intelligibility of native and non-native English speech: A comparative analysis of Cameroon and American and British English.’ Unpublished PhD dissertation. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. R. & Görlach, M. (eds.). 1984. English as a World Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Barasa, D. 2017. ‘Ateso Grammar: A descriptive account of an Eastern Nilotic language.’ Unpublished PhD dissertation. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Bauer, L & Warren, P. 2004. ‘New Zealand English: phonology.’ In Schneider, E. W., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 581602.Google Scholar
Brown, A. 2014. Pronunciation and Phonetics: A Practical Guide for English Language Teachers. New York, Oxon: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crazzolara, J. P. 1960. A Study of Logbara (Ma'di) Language: Grammar and Vocabulary. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Dimitrova–Vulchanova, M., Græsli, B. H., Hauge, H. & Midtgård, T. 2005. An Introduction to the Structure of English. Dragvoll: Department of Modern Foreign Languages, NTNU.Google Scholar
Eberhard, M. D., Simons, G. & Fenning, D. C. 2019. The Ethnologue: Languages of the World (22nd edn.) Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: https://www.ethnologue.com/ (Accessed April 15, 2019).Google Scholar
Fisher, A. E. C. 2000. ‘Assessing the state of Ugandan English.English Today 16: 5761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganske, K. 2008. Mindful of Words: Spelling and Vocabulary Explorations 4–8. NY, London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hodson, J. 2014. Dialect in Film & Literature. London: Red Globe Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, T. N. T. 2000. ‘Towards a phonology of Hong Kong English.World Englishes, 19(3), 337356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isingoma, B. 2016. ‘Lexical borrowings and calques in Ugandan English.’ In Meierkord, C., Isingoma, B. & Namyalo, S., Ugandan English: Its Sociolinguistics, Structure and Uses in a Globalizing Post-Protectorate. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 149172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isingoma, B. & Meierkord, C. 2016. ‘Ugandan English – challenges to, and food for, current theories.’ In Meierkord, C., Isingoma, B. & Namyalo, S., Ugandan English: Its Sociolinguistics, Structure and Uses in a Globalizing Post-Protectorate. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.118.Google Scholar
Isingoma, B. & Meierkord, C. 2019. ‘Capturing the lexicon of Ugandan English: ICE-Uganda and its effective complements.’ In Esimaje, A. U., Gut, U. & Antia, B. E. (eds.), Corpus Linguistics and African Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 293328.Google Scholar
Ježek, M. 2012. ‘The double-edged sword of RP: The contrasting roles of a pronunciation model in both native and non-native environments.’ Research in Language, 10(2), 133142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. 1918. An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Meierkord, C. 2012. Interactions across Englishes. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, C. 2016. ‘Diphthongs in Ugandan English: Evidence for and against variety status and Interactions across Englishes.’ In Meierkord, C., Isingoma, B. & Namyalo, S., Ugandan English: Its Sociolinguistics, Structure and Uses in a Globalizing Post-Protectorate. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 121147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchers, G. 2004. ‘English spoken in Orkney and Shetland: Phonology.’ In Schneider, E. W., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, Berlin: Mouton, pp. 3546.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R. 2004. ‘Synopsis: The phonology of English in Africa and South and Southeast Asia.’ In Schneider, E. W., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, Berlin: Mouton, pp. 10991109.Google Scholar
Myers–Scotton, C. & Okeju, J. 1972. ‘Loan word integration in Ateso.Anthropological Linguistics 14(9), 368382.Google Scholar
Mwita, L. C. 2007. ‘Prenasalization and the IPA.’ UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 106, 5867.Google Scholar
Nassenstein, N. 2016. ‘A preliminary description of Ugandan English.’ World Englishes, 35(3), 396420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njeru, M. 2013. ‘Dialect and the learning of English as a second language in Kenya.English Linguistics Research, 2(1), 129133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocamringa, 2005. English for Advanced Learners. Klear Solutions Limited: Kampala.Google Scholar
Orude, T. 2016. ‘The influence of Ateso phonology on the proficiency of English in selected secondary schools in Soroti Municipality.’ Unpublished BA dissertation. Gulu: Gulu University.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (OED). http://www.oed.com/ (Accessed April 15, 2019).Google Scholar
Oyaro, J. 2019. ‘A description of some phonetic and phonological aspects of the Acholi language.’ Unpublished MA dissertation. Kampala: Makerere University.Google Scholar
Platt, J., Weber, H. & Ho, M. L. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schmied, J. 1991. English in Africa: An Introduction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmied, J. 2004. ‘East African English (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania): Phonology.’ In Schneider, E. W., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 918930.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. E. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.) 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Simo-Bobda, A. 2000. ‘The uniqueness of Ghanaian English pronunciation in West Africa.Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 30 (2), 185198.Google Scholar
Simo-Bobda, A. 2001. ‘East and Southern African English accents.’ World Englishes, 20(3), 269284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simo-Bobda, A. 2004. ‘Cameroon English: Phonology.’ In Schneider, E. W., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 885901.Google Scholar
Tsilimos, M. 2018. The idiosyncrasy of East African English. Journal of Language, Technology and Entrepreneurship in Africa, 9(1), 131150.Google Scholar
Upton, C. 2004. Received Pronunciation. In Schneider, E. W., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 217230.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, B. 2004. ‘Black South African English: Phonology.’ In Schneider, E. W., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 943952.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. 2004. ‘St Helena English: Phonology.’ In Schneider, E. W., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C. (eds.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton, pp. 985991.Google Scholar