Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T07:21:33.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fowler and fouler?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Thirunarayanan Sriraman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some reflections on a ‘linguistic moralizer’

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 23 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryson, Bill. 1990. The Mother Tongue: English and How It Got That Way. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Fowler, H.W. & Fowler., F.G. 1906. The King's English. 3rd edition, 1931: rpt. 1954. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fowler, H.W. 1926. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: OUP. 2nd edition, revised by Sir Ernest Gowers, 1965. ELBS Edition, 1968.Google Scholar
Mehta, Ved. 1971. John Is Easy to Please: Encounters with the Written and the Spoken Word. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph. 1972. The English Language and Images of Matter. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Morris, William & Mary, . 1975. Harper Dictionary of Contemporary Usage. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sledd, James. 1980. “Linguistic relativism: the divorce of word from work”, in Studies in English Linguistics: For Randolph Quirk. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Thurber, James. 1931. The Owl in the Attic and Other Perplexities. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar