Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:50:44.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The folly of language planning; Or, A brief history of the English language in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Abstract

How mixed language usage evolved as a natural compromise between educational policy and social reality

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afendras, E. A. 1997. ‘The onset of bilingualism in Hong Kong: Language choice in the home domain.’ In Pennington, M. C., ed., Language in Hong Kong at century's end. Hong Kong: University Press.Google Scholar
Anon. 1860. The Englishman in China. London: Saunders, Otley, & Co. Cited in Baker & Mühlhäusler, 1990.Google Scholar
Baker, P., & Mühlhäusler, P.. 1990. ‘From business to pidgin’. In Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 1, 87115.Google Scholar
Balla, J., & Pennington, M. C.. 1996. ‘The perception of English-medium instruction by tertiary-level vocational students in Hong Kong’. In Education Journal, 24(1), 131154.Google Scholar
Hirvela, A., & Law, E.. 1991. ‘A survey of local English teachers' attitudes toward English and ELT’. In Institute of Language in Education Journal, 8, 2538.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. K. 1991. ‘Teaching and learning in the English stream in secondary school: Implications of ECR4’. In Institute of Language in Education Journal, 8, 1024.Google Scholar
Li, D. C. S. 1996. Issues in bilingualism and biculturalism: A Hong Kong case study. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Li, D. C. S. 1997. ‘The plight of the purist’. In Pennington, M. C., ed., Language in Hong Kong at century's end. Hong Kong: University Press.Google Scholar
Pennington, M. C. 1995a. Eight case studies of classroom discourse in the Hong Kong secondary English class. Research Report No. 42. Department of English, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Pennington, M. C. 1995b. ‘Pattern and variation in use of two languages in the Hong Kong secondary English class’. In RELC Journal, 26(2), 80105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, M. C. 1997. Projecting classroom language use in a group of bilingual graduates of a BATESL course. Language, Culture and Curriculum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, M. C., & Balla, J.. 1996. ‘Bilingualism in microcosm: The emergence of occupation-related discourse communities in Hong Kong tertiary education’. In Education Journal, 24(2), 147171.Google Scholar
Pierson, H. D. 1997. ‘Societal accommodation to English and Putonghua in Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong.’ In Pennington, M. C., ed., Language in Hong Kong at century's end. Hong Kong: University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. T. 1985. Chinese Christians: Elites, middlemen, and the church in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
So, D. W. C. 1992. ‘Language-based bifurcation of secondary education in Hong Kong: Past, present and future’. In Luke, K. K., ed., Into the twenty-first century: Issues of language in education in Hong Kong (pp. 6995). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Walters, S., & Balla, J.. 1997. ‘Medium of instruction: Policy and reality at one Hong Kong tertiary institution.’ In Pennington, M. C., ed., Language in Hong Kong at century's end. Hong Kong: University Press.Google Scholar