Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T16:52:57.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discourse of ‘early ELT for local development’

Assumptions and ideologies in Japan's rural education policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Saran Shiroza Open the ORCID record for Saran Shiroza [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Economic globalization and the concomitant prominence of English as a global language (EGL) have had a considerable impact on educational policies and practices worldwide. The widespread belief in the economic benefits that individuals and societies can attain from greater English proficiency has created a global trend of early English language teaching (ELT) (Copland, Garton & Burns, 2014; Enever, Moon & Raman, 2009). In line with this global trend, Japan, as an economically advanced nation, has also gradually lowered the age at which English is introduced at school. Previous studies have explored the development of national ELT curricula, critically examining the discourses behind these official language-in-education policies (e.g., Kubota, 1998, 2002; Seargeant, 2009; Shiroza, 2020). However, obvious to the keen observer is that early ELT is often implemented more extensively and vigorously in Japan's rural communities than in urban areas, despite the latter's image of being only remotely affected by globalization.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 121 - 129
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The earlier version of this paper was presented at the 17th Asia TEFL conference in 2019. The author would like to thank those in the audience as well as two anonymous reviewers of English Today for their comments and questions that helped improve the manuscript.

References

Amakusa-shi Kyoiku Iinkai, . 2017. ‘Heisei 29 nen dai 2 kai Amakusa-shi kyoiku iinkai teireikai kaigiroku [Amakusa City Education Board 2nd regular meeting minutes, 2017].’ Online at <https://www.city.amakusa.kumamoto.jp/kiji0032065/index.html>..>Google Scholar
Aota, S. 2017. ‘Nihon no chiho kokyo dantai ni okeru gaikokugo kyoiku seisaku [Foreign language education policies in local public bodies in Japan].’ Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, the University of Tokyo, 57, 103–112.Google Scholar
Benesse. 2015. View 21, vol. 1. Tokyo: Benesse Holdings.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. 2007. ‘Foreign language education at elementary schools in Japan.’ Current Issues in Language Planning, 8(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikuhoku-mura. 2015, March 24. ‘Chikuhoku-mura e no iju wo kangaete mimasenka? [How about moving to Chikuhoku Village?]’ Online at <http://www.vill.chikuhoku.lg.jp/archives/970>..>Google Scholar
Consumer Affairs Agency. 2018. ‘Heisei 30 nendo chiho syohisha gyousei no genkyo chosa [Survey of current state of local consumer administration, 2018].’ Online at <https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/local_cooperation/local_consumer_administration/status_investigation/2017/>..>Google Scholar
Copland, F., Garton, S. & Burns, A. 2014. ‘Challenges in teaching English to young learners.’ TESOL Quarterly, 48, 738–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enever, J., Moon, J. & Raman, U. (eds.) 2009. Young Learner English Language Policy and Implementation. Reading: Garnet Publishing.Google Scholar
‘Feature Article: Komyunikeshon noryoku to yutakana kokusai kankaku no ikusei [Cultivating communicative abilities and a rich international sense].’ 2017, April. Risu Keirin, 15, 1–5. Online at <https://shinko-keirin.co.jp/keirinkan/pr/risukeirin/data/no015_all.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Holliday, A. 2005. The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inakadate-mura Kyoiku Iinkai. 2019, January. ‘Inakadate-mura kyoiku shinko kihon keikaku Heisei 30–39 nendo [Inakadate Village Basic plan for educational development, AY 2018–2027].’ Online at <http://www.vill.inakadate.lg.jp/docs/2019022800015/>..>Google Scholar
Itsuki-mura. 2016. Itsuki, vol. 268. Itsuki Village.Google Scholar
Iwabuchi, Y., Yoshikawa, M. & Nagamune, T. 2017. ‘Kyoiku ni yoru chihou sousei senryaku [Regional revitalization through education].’ Okayama Economic Review, 49(1), 41–68.Google Scholar
JOIN (Japan Organization for Internal Migration). 2019. ‘Iju saki wa kyoiku de erabu! [Choose the immigration destination by education!]’ Online at <https://www.iju-join.jp/feature_cont/file/012/02.html#02>..>Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. 1985. ‘Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism.’ In Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. G. (eds.), English in the World. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Kantei. 2016. ‘Soja yama no naka no eigo kyoiku suishin jigyo [Soja project promoting English education in the mountains].’ Online at <https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/tiiki/tiikisaisei/dai38nintei/plan/a070.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Kubota, R. 1998. ‘Ideologies of English in Japan.’ World Englishes, 17(3), 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, R. 2002. ‘The impact of globalization on language teaching in Japan.’ In Block, D. & Cameron, D. (eds.), Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. 2018. ‘Unpacking research and practice in world Englishes and second language acquisition.’ World Englishes, 37(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, R. & McKay, S. L. 2009. ‘Globalization and language learning in rural Japan.’ TESOL Quarterly, 43(4), 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumamoto Prefectural Assembly. 2017, March 8. ‘Kumamoto kengikai 2gatsu teireikai kaigiroku dai7gou [Kumamoto Prefectural Assembly Monthly meeting minutes vol. 7].’ Kumamoto Prefectural Assembly Archive. Online at <https://ssp.kaigiroku.net/tenant/prefkumamoto/pg/index.html>..>Google Scholar
Lee, Y.–J. & Sugiura, H. 2018. ‘Key factors in determining internal migration to rural areas and its promoting measures.’ Public Policy Review, 14(1), 153–176.Google Scholar
MEXT. 2013. ‘English education reform plan corresponding to globalization.’ Online at <http://www.mext.go.jp/en/news/topics/detail/1372656.htm>..>Google Scholar
MEXT. 2017a. ‘Kyoiku katei tokurei-ko seido [Education curriculum special exception school system].’ Online at <http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/tokureikou/index.htm>..>Google Scholar
MEXT. 2017b. ‘Shogakko gakushu shido yoryo [The course of study for elementary schools].’ Online at <http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/03/18/1413522_001.pdf>..>Google Scholar
MEXT. 2017c. ‘“Nihongo-shido ga hitsuyo na jidou seito no ukeirejoukyoutou ni kansuru chousa (Heisei 28)” no kekka ni tsuite [About the result of the “Survey on the status of acceptance of children who need Japanese language instruction (2016)”].’ Online at <http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/29/06/1386753.htm>..>Google Scholar
MEXT. 2018. ‘Heisei 30 nendo eigo kyoiku jisshi jokyo chosa (shogakko) no kekka [AY2018 Results of a survey on the implementation of English education (Elementary schools)].’ Online at <http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/kokusai/gaikokugo/1415042.htm>..>Google Scholar
Monbusho. 1998. ‘Shogakko gakushu shido yoryo [The course of study for elementary schools].’ Online at <http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/cs/1320008.htm>..>Google Scholar
Nagai-shi. 2016. Ayame REPO, vol. 38. Nagai City, Yamagata.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai-shi. 2018. ‘Hirano shogakko man-to-man intanetto eikaiwa jugyo [Hirano Elementary School one-on-one internet English conversation lessons].’ Online at <https://www.city.nagai.yamagata.jp/all_the_citizens/education_culture_sports/3/6060.html>..>Google Scholar
Oshida, T., Nakata, K. & Omomo, T. 2013. ‘Jichitai dokuji no karikyuramu kaihatsu [Municipality-driven curriculum development].’ CASEER Annual Report AY2012, 96–107.Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. 2009. The Idea of English in Japan. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. & Earling, E. J. 2011. ‘The discourse of “English as a language for international development”.’ In Coleman, H. (ed.), Dreams and Realities: Developing Countries and the English Language. London: British Council, pp. 248–267.Google Scholar
Shimizu, K. 2018. ‘Kouei-juku ya tokku wo seibi (Okayama-ken Wake-cho), Eigo kyoiku no machi, teiju sokushin [Public after-schools and special zones established (Wake Town, Okayama Prefecture): English education town, promoting settlement].’ Asahi Shimbun, February 1. Online at <http://www.asahi.com/area/hiroshima/articles/MTW20180201351370001.html>..>Google Scholar
Shiroza, S. 2020. ‘Changing language, continuing discourse: A shift toward ELF and persistent native-speakerism in Japan's ELT policy.’ In Giri, R. A., Sharma, A., & D'Angelo, J. (eds.), Functional Variations in English: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Challenges. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 277–293.Google Scholar
Taira, R. 2017, April 3. ‘Wake kara sekai e, sekai kara wake e [From Wake to the world, from the world to Wake].’ DMM Eikaiwa Blog. Online at <https://eikaiwa.dmm.com/blog/33804/>..>Google Scholar
Yamada, K. & Kiyokawa, T. 2010. ‘Eigo joshu to hanasenu sensei: Shiki meirei wa “gisou ukeoi” [Teachers uncommunicable with ALTs: Directions and orders considered “disguised contract”].’ Asahi Judiciary, August 4. Online at <https://judiciary.asahi.com/articles/2010080700001.html>..>Google Scholar
Yamanakako-mura. 2016. ‘Yamanakako-mura kyoiku taiko [Yamanakako Village general outline of education policies].’ Online at <http://www.vill.yamanakako.lg.jp/docs/2016121000018/files/0sougoukyouiku_taikou.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (eds.). 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar