Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:55:00.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Bogged down’ ELT in Bangladesh: Problems and policy

Investigating some problems that encumber ELT in an EFL context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2014

Extract

Hamid & Baldauf's (2008) labelling of the term ‘bogged down’ within the Bangladeshi ELT context and their prediction about the outcome of the English Language Teaching Improvement Project (ELTIP) appear to be true. While Hamid & Baldauf (2008) endeavour to present the poor ELT reality of rural Bangladesh, the current paper aims to explore the problems that make ELT ‘bogged down’ in Bangladesh.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, M. M. 2010a. ‘The importance of a collaborative approach in the design of a learner- centred language syllabus: Revisiting the curriculum – an investigation into whether the HSE English language syllabi in the Bangladesh national curriculum meet the learners' needs.’ Unpublished Master's thesis. Essex: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Ali, M. M. 2010b. ‘Revisiting the English Language Teaching (ELT) curriculum design: How appropriate is Bangladesh higher secondary level national ELT curriculum as a learner-centred one?IIUC Studies, 7(1), 283–96.Google Scholar
Ali, M. M. 2011. ‘The study of errors and feedback in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) research: Strategies used by the ELT practitioners in Bangladesh to address the errors their students make in learning English.’ IIUC Studies, 8(1), 131–40.Google Scholar
Ali, M. M. 2012. ‘Evaluating ELT materials: Theory and practice.’ Paper presented in the Nation Seminar, ‘Language, Literature & Education’, organized by the International Islamic University, Chittagong, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Carter, R. & Nunan, D. (eds.) 2001. The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamid, M. O. & Baldauf, R. B. 2008. ‘Will CLT bail out the bogged down ELT in Bangladesh?English Today, 24(3), 1624.Google Scholar
Harmer, J. 2003. ‘Popular culture, methods and context.’ ELT Journal, 57(3), 288–94.Google Scholar
Islam, Z. 2003. ‘Bridging the gap: Curricular innovation and teacher preparation perspective in Bangladesh.’ Unpublished Master's thesis. Essex: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Kabir, M. H. 2007. ‘An investigation into the validity and reliability of the testing of the reading and writing skills at HSC in Bangladesh.’ Unpublished Master's thesis. Essex: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Kabir, M. H. 2009. ‘Necessity of initiating Rating Scale for more reliable assessment of writing skill at HSC level: A case study.IIUC Studies, 6(1), 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamol, E. 2009. ‘Closing the gaps.’ Star Weekend Magazine, Bangladesh. July 3, Volume 8, Issue 761. Online at <http://www.thedailystar.net/magazine/2009/07/01/cocer.htm> (Accessed September 10, 2009).+(Accessed+September+10,+2009).>Google Scholar
McDonough, J. & Shaw, C. 2003. Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher's Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. 2009. CPD: Training on Secondary English: Learners’ Materials. Ministry of Education: Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Seargeant, P. & Erling, E. J. 2011. ‘The discourse of “English as a language for international development”: Policy assumptions and practical challenges.’ In Coleman, H. (ed.), Dreams and Realities: Developing Countries and the English Language. London: British Council, pp. 248–67.Google Scholar