Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:26:55.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three chairs for New Zealand English: the EAR/AIR merger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Janet Holmes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some emerging features of speech that distinguish usage in New Zealand from the rest of the Anglophone world

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1995 , pp. 14 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, Laurie. 1986. ‘Notes on New Zealand English phonetics and phonology.’ English World-Wide 7, 225–258.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 1992. ‘Linguistic correlates of gender and sex.’ English World-Wide 13, 2, 173–218.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth & Margaret, A. Maclagan. 1990. ‘A longitudinal study of the ear/air contrast in New Zealand speech.’ In Allan, Bell and Janet, Holmes (eds) New Zealand Ways of Speaking English, pp. 129–148. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1994. ‘Two for /t/: flapping and glottal stops in New Zealand English.’ Paper presented at the Fourth Language and Society Conference,Lincoln University.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. & Allan, Bell. 1993. ‘On shear markets and sharing sheep: the merger of EAR and AIR in New Zealand English.’ Language Variation and Change 4, 3, 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Allan, Bell, & Mary, Boyce. 1991. Variation and Change in New Zealand English: a Social Dialect Investigation. Project Report to the Social Sciences Committee of the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology. Wellington: Victoria University.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. ‘Some principles of linguistic methodology.’ Language in Society 1, 97–120.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. ‘The intersection of sex and social class in the course of language change.’ Language Variation and Change 2, 205–254.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Mark, Karen, & Corey, Miller. 1991. ‘Near mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast.’ Language Variation and Change 3, 33–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclagan, Margaret. 1994. ‘Wier are we going: An update on Ear/Air in New Zealand English.’ Paper presented at the Fourth Language and Society Conference,Lincoln University,08.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1982. ‘Social network and linguistic focussing.’ In Suzanne, Romaine (ed.) Sociolinguistic Variation in Speech Communities, pp. 41–52. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Moonwomon, Birch. 1989. ‘Another look at the role of female speakers in sound change.’ In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society pp. 238–247. Berkeley, California: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1988. ‘Norwich revisited: recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect.’ English World-Wide 9, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Arnold. 1938. New Zealand English: How it Should be Spoken. Christchurch: Whitcombe & Tombs Ltd.Google Scholar
Woods, Nicola. 1994. ‘Twentieth century developments in New Zealand English.’ Paper presented at the Fourth Language and Society Conference,Lincoln University.Google Scholar