Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:52:39.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Talking Black in America

The role of the documentary in public education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2019

Walt Wolfram  and
Kellynoel Waldorf
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

African American Language (AAL) is the most widely recognized – and controversial – ethnic variety of English in the world. In the United States national controversies about the speech of African Americans have erupted periodically for more than a half-century now, from the difference-deficit debates in the 1960s (Labov, 1972) to the Ebonics controversy in the 1990s (Rickford, 1999) and linguistic profiling in the 2000s (Baugh, 2003, 2018). Further, the adoption of performance genres from AAL into languages other than English, such as hip-hop and rap, has given the speech of African Americans even wider international recognition and global status (Omoniyi, 2006). The curiosities and controversies about African American speech symbolically reveal (1) the depth of people's beliefs and opinions about language differences; (2) the widespread level of public misinformation about language diversity; and (3) the need for informed knowledge about language variation in public life and in education.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 3 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, L. & Kolker, A. (producers). 1986. American Tongues. New York: Center for New American Media.Google Scholar
Baugh, J. 2003. ‘Linguistic profiling.’ In Makoni, C., Smitherman, G., Ball, A. F. & Spears, A. K. (eds.), Black Linguistics: Language, Society, and Politics in Africa and the Americas. New York: Routledge, 155–68.Google Scholar
Baugh, J. 2018. Linguistics in Pursuit of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A. & Garrett, P. (eds.) 1998. Approaches to Media Discourse. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blanton, P. & Waters, K. (producers). 1994. The Ocracoke Brogue. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Language and Life Project.Google Scholar
Cameron, D., Fraser, E, Harvey, P., Rampton, M. B. H & Richardson, K. 1992. Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Charity Hudley, A. H. & Mallinson, C. 2011. Understanding Language Variation in U.S. Schools. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Denham, K. 2007. ‘Linguistics in primary school.’ Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 243–259.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, N. 2007. Personal email correspondence on community collaboration. 27 September, 2007.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. ‘Academic ignorance and black intelligence.’ Atlantic Monthly (June) 59-67.Google Scholar
MacNeil, R. (producer). 1986. The Story of English. London/New York: MacNeil/Lehrer Productions.Google Scholar
Omoniyi, T. 2006. ‘Hip-hop through the world Englishes lens: A response to Globalization.’ World Englishes, 25, 195–208.Google Scholar
Reaser, J., Adger, C. A., Wolfram, W. & Christian, D. 2017. Dialects at School: Educating Linguistically Diverse Students. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reaser, J. & Myrick, C. 2015. ‘Writing language-based trade books: Making linguistics accessible to lay audiences.’ Language and Linguistic Compass, 9(5), 198–208.Google Scholar
Reaser, J. & Wolfram, W. 2007. Voices of North Carolina: From the Atlantic to Appalachia. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Language and Life Project. Teacher Manual & Student Workbook.Google Scholar
Rickford, J.R. 1999. African American Vernacular English: Features, Evolution and Educational Implications. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W., Reaser, J. & Vaughn, C. 2008. ‘Operationalizing linguistic gratuity: From principle to practice.’ Linguistic and Language Compass, 3, 1109–34.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. 2016. ‘Public sociolinguistic education in the United States: A proactive, comprehensive program.’ In Lawson, R. & Sayers, D. (eds.) Sociolinguistic Research: Impact and Application. New York: Routledge, 88–107.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. & Eisenhauer, K. (forthcoming) ‘Implicit bias and sociolinguistic justice.’ In Blake, R. & Buchstaller, I. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Work of John Rickford. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar