Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:14:25.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Language gene blues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

Patrick Honeybone
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

PATRICK HONEYBONE replies to Michael Bulley's article ‘A wild gene chase’(ET51)

Type
Angles of Vision
Information
English Today , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 45 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bickerton, Derek. 1996. Language and Human Behaviour. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Bulley, Michael. 1997. ‘A wild gene chase’. In English Today 51: 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chametzky, Robert. 1994. ‘Chomsky-adjunction’. In Lingua 93: 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 1988. Chomsky's Universal Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward & Wexler, Kenneth. 1994. ‘Triggers’. In Linguistic Inquiry 25: 407–454.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1991 (third edition). Chomsky. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Modgil, Sohan & Modgil, Celia, eds. 1987. Noam Chomsky: Consensus and Controversy. New York:Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 1986. The Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York:William Morrow.Google Scholar