Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:15:53.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Native English speakers' authority in English

Do Chinese speakers of English care about native English speakers' judgments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2015

Ying Wang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Given the unprecedented spread of English, native English speakers (NESs) have been estimated to number 508 million by 2050 (Graddol, 1997: 27), while a bold estimation of speakers of English is 2 billion by 2050 (Crystal, 2008: 4–5). The international demographic profile of English presents a scenario whereby the development of English depends on how this language is used by non-native English speakers (NNESs), who are obviously in the majority for English use (e.g. Brumfit, 2001: 116; Crystal, 2008: 6; Graddol, 1997: 10; Mauranen, 2012; Seidlhofer, 2011: 7–8). While the importance of the number of English speakers globally is acknowledged, English in China remains a particularly interesting area for linguists. Not only English is widely learned in China, but also Chinese speakers of English are increasingly involved in intercultural encounters. In Graddol's (1997, 2006) discussion of the future of English, a comprehensive account is put forward about China, a country that has statistical significance for the development of English, given its large population of people who know English and its economic development. As Crystal (2008: 5) notes:

[I]f India is the significant factor in relation to second-language speakers (in the sense of countries where English has some sort of special status), then China is surely the corresponding factor in relation to foreign-language speakers (in the sense of countries where the language has no official status).

In this sense, it would seem that China will play an important role in shaping the profile of English use in the future. If this is an acceptable hypothesis, the development of English in China has implications for the future world of English use.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 35 - 40
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolton, K. 2003. Chinese Englishes: A Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. 2001. Individual Freedom in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cogo, A. & Dewey, M. 2012. Analyzing English as a Lingua Franca: A Corpus-Driven Investigation. London; New York, N.Y.: Continuum.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2008. ‘Two thousand million?’ English Today, 24(1), 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press (FLTRP) blog. Online at <http://iresearch.unipus.cn/hottopic/detail.php?PostID=12956> (Accessed April 10, 2015).+(Accessed+April+10,+2015).>Google Scholar
Graddol, D. 1997. The Future of English? London: British Council.Google Scholar
Graddol, D. 2006. English Next: Why Global English May Mean the End of ‘English as a Foreign Language’. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language: New Models, New Norms, New Goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2006. ‘Points of view and blind spots: ELF and SLA.’ International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 137–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2007. English as a Lingua Franca: Identity and Attitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2014. English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2015. Global Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. 1990. ‘World Englishes and applied linguistics.’ World Englishes, 9(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. 1994. ‘Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts.’ Language in Society, 23(2), 163–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A. 2012. Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. 2003. A Concept of International English and Related Issues: From ‘Real English’ to ‘Realistic English’? Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. 2004. ‘Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca.’ Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. 2006. Language Policy: Hidden Agenda and New Approaches. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. 2012. ‘“Chinese speakers” perceptions of their English in intercultural communication.’ Unpublished doctoral thesis. Southampton: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. 2013. ‘Non-conformity to ENL norms: A perspective from Chinese English users.’ Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2(2), 255–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. 2015. ‘Language awareness and ELF perceptions of Chinese university students.’ In Bowles, H. & Cogo, A. (eds.), International Perspectives on English as a Lingua Franca: Pedagogical Insights. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Q. 2012. ‘English as a lingua franca: A pedagogical perspective.’ Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1(2), 371–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1994. ‘The ownership of English.’ TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 2003. Defining Issues in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar