Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:17:59.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning English today: what can World Englishes teach college students in Taiwan?

How do World Englishes enlighten, empower, and influence Taiwanese college students’ understanding, learning, and use of English?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

Yu-Jung Chang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the global spread of English, research in World Englishes (WE) has burgeoned in the past two decades. Its concepts have been taken up by researchers in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) to question ‘native-speakerism’ (Holliday, 2005, 2006) in English instruction. However, the implications of this theoretical discussion have so far yet to be realized in EFL classrooms, where teachers and learners alike still largely submit to native-speaker norms. This study therefore aims to examine how discussions of power, politics, and the spread of Englishes might influence students’ perceptions of English and their experiences of learning and using English. The analysis focuses on papers written by students enrolled in a semester-long WE course, and demonstrates the value of bringing WE into English curriculums to help students become critical learners and confident users of English today.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 21 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braine, G. 1999. Non-native Educators in English Language Teaching. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. 1999. Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. 2002. ‘Reconstructing local knowledge.’ Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(4), pp. 243–59.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2003. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graddol, D. 2006. English Next: Why Global English May Mean the End of ‘English as a Foreign Language’. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. R. 2005. The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. R. 2006. ‘Native-speakerism.’ ELT Journal, 60(4), 385–7.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language: New Models, New Norms, New Goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2006. ‘Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca.’ TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 157–81.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2007. English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2009. World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jin, J. 2005. ‘Which is better in China, a local or a native English-speaking teacher?’ English Today, 21(3), 39–46.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. 1985. ‘Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle.’ In Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. (eds), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. 1998. ‘Ideologies of English in Japan.’ World Englishes, 17(3), 295–306.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. 2001. ‘Discursive construction of the images of U.S. classrooms.’ TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 9–38.Google Scholar
Lai, H-Y. T. 2008. ‘English as an international language? Taiwanese university teachers’ dilemma and struggle.’ English Today, 24(3), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, A., W., Wang, N., Akamatsu & A. M, Riazi. 2002. ‘Appropriating English, expanding identities, and re-visioning the field: From TESOL to teaching English for glocalized communication (TEGCOM).’ Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(4), 295–316.Google Scholar
Lin, H-I. 2012. ‘Local responses to global English: Perceptions of English in Taiwan.’ English Today, 28(3), 67–72.Google Scholar
Norton, B. 1997. ‘Language, identity, and the ownership of English.’ TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409–29.Google Scholar
Pakir, A. 2009. ‘English as a lingua franca: Analyzing research frameworks in international English, world Englishes, and ELF.’ World Englishes, 28(2), 224–35.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 1998. English and the Discourse of Colonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 2001. Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. 2005. ‘Key concepts in ELT: English as a lingua franca.’ ELT Journal, 59(4), 339–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. 2009. ‘Common ground and different realities: World Englishes and English as a Lingua Franca.’ World Englishes, 28(2), 236–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, C. 2004. ‘Connecting the local and global: An interview with the Minister of Education, Tu Chen Sheng.’ (本土化如何與國際化接軌— 教育部杜正勝專訪). Commonwealth, 311, 88–94.Google Scholar
Varghese, M., B., Morgan, B., Johnston & K. A, Johnson. 2005. ‘Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond.’ Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21–44.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. 1994. ‘The ownership of English.’ TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar