Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:35:57.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning English to fly: A study of Chinese cargo airline pilots’ learning engagement

Understanding Chinese pilots’ English learning and use informs efforts to improve their command of English and ensure aviation safety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

Ke Zhao ,
Xiaohang Guo  and
Xuesong Gao
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Due to a growing concern with the English language competence of international airline pilots, a growing body of research has been conducted on issues related to the International Aviation English Test, which pilots need to pass in order to fly on international routes (e.g. Jones, 2003; Ragan, 1997; Seiler, 2009). This paper contributes to this research by reporting on a mixed method inquiry into Chinese pilots’ engagement with learning English for aviation. The study involved a survey of 165 pilots working for a major Chinese cargo airline, and follow-up interviews with two of the surveyed participants (one senior and one junior) to explore their International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) test preparation and learning engagement. The findings of the study indicate that policy-makers and relevant English language education specialists need to develop tailor made courses that will better help these pilots to improve their command of English and thus ensure aviation safety.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 5 - 11
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, J. C. 2009. ‘Air safety, language assessment policy, and policy implementation: The case of Aviation English.’ Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 168–187.Google Scholar
Cutting, J. 2012. ‘English for airport ground staff.’ English for Specific Purposes, 31(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Farris, C., Trofimovich, P., Segalowitz, N. & Gatbonton, E. 2008. ‘Air traffic communication in a second language: Implications of cognitive factors for training and assessment.’ TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. K. 2003. ‘Miscommunication between pilots and air traffic control.’ Language Problems & Language Planning, 27(3), 233–248.Google Scholar
Kim, H. & Elder, C. 2009. ‘Understanding Aviation English as a Lingua Franca: Perceptions of Korean Aviation Personnel.’ Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
Knoch, U. 2014. ‘Using subject specialists to validate an ESP rating scale: The case of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) rating scale.’ English for Specific Purposes, 33(1), 77–86.Google Scholar
Ragan, P. H. 1997. ‘Aviation English: An introduction.’ The Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 7(2). Online at <http://commons.erau.edu/jaaer/vol7/iss2/1> (Accessed March 17, 2017).Google Scholar
Seiler, W. 2009. ‘English as a lingua franca in aviation.’ English Today, 25(2), 43–48.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. & Girginer, H. 2002. ‘The use of discourse analysis to enhance ESP teacher knowledge: An example using aviation English.’ English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajima, A. 2004. ‘Fatal miscommunication: English in aviation safety.’ World Englishes, 23(3), 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, A. G. 2007. ‘Teaching aviation English in the Chinese context: Developing ESP theory in a non-English speaking country.’ English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 121–128.Google Scholar