No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Double-standard English
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 October 2008
Abstract
An exploration of the relative status of standard and non-standard varieties of British English, which asks: ‘Is correction ever appropriate?’
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998
References
Baty, P. 1997. ‘The essential guide to sexuality’. London: The Times Higher Education Supplement, 18 July, p. 21.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. & Edwards, V. 1993. ‘Sociolinguistics in the classroom: exploring linguistic diversity’. In Milroy & Milroy.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. & Milroy, J. 1993. ‘Syntactic variation in non-standard dialects: background issues’. In Milroy & Milroy.Google Scholar
Cox, B. 1991. Cox on Cox: The Battle for the National Curriculum. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. 1989. The Politics of Discourse: the standard language question in British cultural debates. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, N. 1981. Language Death. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N., 1994. ‘The Appropriacy of “Appropriateness”’. In Fairclough, N., ed. Critical Language Awareness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 1979. Language Shift: Social Determinants of Language Change in Bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Honey, J. 1983. The Language Trap. London: National Council for Educational Standards.Google Scholar
Leonard, S.A. 1962. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700–1800. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 1989. ‘The State of English in the English State: Reflections on the Cox Report’. In Language and Education. Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 236 ff.Google Scholar