Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:42:17.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dialect Maintenance in East Anglia

Singin’ The Same Old Tune

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2020

Kerri-Ann Butcher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The area of East Anglia in which its traditional dialects are spoken has shrunk significantly over the past few decades and seen a marked decline in the use of traditional features. These include lack of -s marking on third-person singular forms (Kingston, 2000; Potter, 2018), as well as the long-standing distinction between those words descended from Middle English /ɔ:/ and /ɔu/, as in ‘moan’ vs ‘mown’, which failed to become homophonous as part of the Long Mid Mergers (Wells, 1982a). Like other relics, this distinction now only remains in East Anglia's more northern locales (Trudgill & Foxcroft, 1978; Trudgill, 2004; Butcher, 2019). This apparent ‘dialect death’ situation (Trudgill, 1986: 68) is the outcome of continued supralocalisation, a situation in which locally specific linguistic forms lose out to linguistic variants with greater socio-spatial currency, usually as a result of mobility and dialect contact (Britain, 2010). In East Anglia's case, Trudgill (2001) argues that dialect levelling has largely been driven by the impact of London and Home Counties varieties of English. This process is predicted to continue (Trudgill, 1986; Kingston, 2000), though is unlikely to be straightforward. Britain (2011) reports that substantial intra-regional differences are found in relation to route and rate of sound change in East Anglia. This calls for more comprehensive analyses of East Anglian English to better understand the workings of this ‘heterogenous homogenisation’ (Britain, 2011: 57), and how individual case studies relate to the overall shrinkage of the area in which traditional East Anglian dialects are spoken. This paper presents data in this vein from two studies undertaken in Suffolk, southern East Anglia. The first presents data on unstressed vowel tensing, which refers to the alternation between [ə] and [ɪ] in those unstressed syllables where /ɪ/ occurs in other varieties of Southern British English (SBE) e.g. ‘carpet’ [kɑ:pɪt] / [ka:pəʔ]. The second reports data on yod dropping, i.e. the absence of /j/ from sequences of C+/ju/ e.g. ‘huge’ [hju:dʒ] / [hu:dʒ]. Both variables are well known from descriptions of East Anglian dialects but, as we will see later, they appear to behave differently in this study of contemporary East Anglian English.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 36 , Special Issue 3: Special Issue: Language in the South of England , September 2020 , pp. 48 - 58
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amos, J. 2007. ‘Wadda Boo'iful Place: An analysis of the variables (ju) and (t) in Mersea Island English.’ Unpublished MA Dissertation. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Amos, J., Britain, D., & Spurling, J. 2008. ‘Yod-dropping on the East Anglian periphery.’ Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 17: Amsterdam, April 2008.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2020. ‘Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] Version 6.1.16.’ Online at http://www.praat.org (Accessed June 6, 2020).Google Scholar
Britain, D. 2002. ‘Surviving “Estuary English”: Innovation diffusion, koineisation and local dialect differentiation in the English Fenland.’ Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 41, 74–103.Google Scholar
Britain, D. 2005. ‘Innovation diffusion: ‘‘Estuary English’’ and local dialect differentiation: The survival of Fenland Englishes’. Linguistics, 43(5), 995–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, D. 2010. ‘Supralocal regional dialect levelling.’ In Llamas, C. & Watt, D. (eds.), Language and Identities. UK: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
Britain, D. 2011. ‘The heterogeneous homogenisation of dialects in England.’ Taal en Tongval, 63, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, D. 2014. ‘Linguistic diffusion and the social heterogeneity of space and mobility.’ Paper presented at the 3rd International Society for the Linguistics of English Conference. University of Switzerland, Zurich.Google Scholar
Butcher, K. 2013. ‘An investigation into yod dropping in Ipswich.’ Unpublished BA Dissertation. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Butcher, K. 2015. ‘An exploration of the variables (t) and (ing) in Ipswich English: Modelling linguistic variation in phonological theory.’ Unpublished MRes Dissertation. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Butcher, K. 2019. ‘Under pressure: East Anglian English.’ Paper presented at the International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLaVE 10: Leeuwarden, 2019.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. J. 1889. On Early English Pronunciation, Part V – The Existing Phonology of English Dialects Compared with that of West Saxon Speech. Woodbridge: English Text Society.Google Scholar
Fielding, A. J. 1992. ‘Migration and social mobility: South East England as an escalator region.’ Regional Studies, 26(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. & Trudgill, P. 2001. ‘Preface.’ In Fisiak, J. & Trudgill, P.. (eds.), East Anglian English. Woodbridge: D.S Brewer.Google Scholar
Hannisdal, B. R. 2006. ‘Variability and change in received pronunciation: A study of six phonological variables in the speech of television newsreaders.’ Ph.D. Thesis, Norway: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Kazemi, R. 2015. ‘Yod variation in Australian English: A sociolinguistic investigation.’ MA Dissertation. Sweden: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Kingston, M. 2000. ‘Dialects in danger.’ Unpublished MA Dissertation. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Kökeritz, H. 1932. The Phonology of the Suffollk Dialect, Descriptive and Historical. Uppsala University: Appelbergs Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.Google Scholar
Kristensson, G. 1994. ‘Sociolects in 14th-century London.’ In Melchers, G. & Johannesson, N.-L. (eds.), Non-Standard Varieties of Language, Stockholm Studies in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1971. ‘The study of language in its social context.’ In Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.), Advances in the Sociology of Language (Vol. 1). The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton, pp. 152–216.Google Scholar
Labov, W, 1990. ‘The intersection of sex and social class.’ Language Variation and Change 2, 205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, H., Barry, M. V., Halliday, W. J., Tilling, P. M. & Wakelin, M. F. 1962–71. Survey of English Dialects: The Basic Material (4 vols., each in 3 parts). Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar
Potter, R. 2018. ‘A variationist multilocality study of unstressed vowels and verbal -s marking in the peripheral dialect of East Suffolk.’ Unpublished PhD Thesis. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
RStudio Team. 2020. ‘RStudio: Integrated development for R. Rstudio.’ Online at http://www.rstudio.com/ (Accessed June 6,2020).Google Scholar
Straw, M., & Patrick, P. L. 2007. ‘Dialect acquisition of glottal variation in /t/: Barbadians in Ipswich.’ Language Sciences, 29(2–3), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurling, J. 2004. ‘Traditional feature loss in Ipswich: Dialect attrition in the East Anglian county of Suffolk’. Unpublished BA Dissertation. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1974a. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1974b. ‘Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography.’ Language in Society, 3(2), 215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1990. The Dialects of English. Oxford: Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 2001. ‘Modern East Anglia as a dialect area’. In: Fisiak, J. & Trudgill, P. (eds.), East Anglian English. Woodbridge: D.S Brewer, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 2004. ‘The dialect of East Anglia: Phonology.’ In Schneider, E., Burridge, K., Kortmann, B., Mesthrie, R. & Upton, C.. (eds), A Handbook of Varieties of English, Volume: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. & Foxcroft, T. 1978. ‘On the sociolinguistics of vocalic mergers: transfer and approximation in East Anglia.’ In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 69–79.Google Scholar
Watson, C. I., Maclagan, M. & Harrington, J. 2000. ‘Acoustic evidence for vowel change in New Zealand English.’ Language Variation and Change, 12(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. 1982a. Accents of English I: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. 1982b. Accents of English II: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, A. & Kerswill, P. 1999. ‘Dialect levelling: change and continuity in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull.’ In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (eds.), Urban Voices. Accent Studies in the British Isles. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 141–162.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1905. The English Dialect Grammar, Comprising the Dialects of England, of the Shetland and Orkney islands, and of Those Parts of Scotland, Ireland & Wales Where English is Habitually Spoken. Harvard University, USA: H. Frowde.Google Scholar