Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:58:09.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Back to basics

A response to ‘The English major crisis in China’ (Chen, 2019)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2020

Xiaozhou (Emily) Zhou  and
Mingjian Zha
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The English major programme and related academic disciplines in Chinese universities are apparently experiencing growing pains as documented in the article entitled ‘The English Major Crisis in China’ published in this journal (Chen, 2019). In the article, Chen analysed the controversies surrounding the English major programme in Chinese universities and presented a somewhat gloomy prospect for the English major programme as an undergraduate subject in Chinese universities. Yet we found that the disheartening picture of the English major programme as portrayed by the article is open to question. We are also concerned that the article may misguide readers and negate the efforts that educators have undertaken to refine the English major programme in Chinese universities. For this reason, we would like to respond to the article with a different view, which has been made possible by our concerted efforts to bring the English major programme back to its basics over the last few years. We argue that the English major programme will play a critical role in promoting humanistic education in Chinese universities.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 24 - 29
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, B. 2004. China's English: A History of English in Chinese Education. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, K. & Graddol, D. 2012. ‘English in China today: The current popularity of English in China is unprecedented, and has been fuelled by the recent political and social development of Chinese society.’ English Today, 28(3), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, N. 2019. ‘The English major crisis in China: Why did the once-popular major fall out of favor among Chinese students?’ English Today, 1–9. doi:10.1017/S026607841900035XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, H. & Guan, H. 2016. ‘Hindrances to the new teaching goals of College English in China: Being contextually blind and linguistically groundless, current tertiary ELT policy needs to be redefined.’ English Today, 32(1), 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W. 2008. ‘Yingyu zhuanye zhuan zai nali? [Where are the disciplinary characteristics of English as a major?]’ Wai Yu Jie [Foreign Language World], 6, 18–24.Google Scholar
Hu, W. & Sun, Y. 2006. ‘Tuchu xueke tedian, jiaqiang renwen jiaoyu – shilun dangqian yingyu zhuanye jiaoxue gaige. [Projecting disciplinary charactersitics and strengthening humanist education – on the teaching reform of current English major.]’ Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research], 5, 243–247.Google Scholar
Jin, L. 2010. ‘Zhuzhong renwen neihan de yingyu zhuanye kecheng tixi gaige. [A curriculum reform focusing on the humanist implications of the English major.]’ Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research], 3, 176–182.Google Scholar
Li, F. 1993. Yingyu Xuexi Jingyantan. [On English Language Learning.] Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, D. & Wu, Z. 2015. English Language Education in China: Past and Present. Beijing: The People's Education Press.Google Scholar
Qu, W. 2012. ‘“Practical” English and the crisis of English studies: Is the recent focus on “practical” English undermining the academic quality of English studies at China's universities?’ English Today, 28(3), 15–20.Google Scholar
Swaffar, J. 1999. ‘The case for foreign languages as a discipline.’ ADFL Bulletin, 30(3), 6–12.Google Scholar
Wang, S. 2002. ‘Yinggai zhongjie wenxueshi jia xuandu moshi. [The mode of literature history plus selected readings should be abolished.]’ Zhengzhou Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue shehuikexue ban) [Zhengzhou University Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences Issues)], 5, 10–11.Google Scholar
Wu, Z. 2009. ‘Waiyu xueke zhishi puxixue kaobian [A genealogy of foreign language as disciplinary knowledge.]’ Guangdong Waiyu Waimao Daxue Xuebao [Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies], 20(4), 64–68.Google Scholar
Zha, M. 2012. ‘Yingyu zhuanye gaoduan rencai peiyang linian yu renwenhua jiaoyu. [The learning outcomes of elite intellectuals of English major and humanist education.]’ In Zhong, M. (ed.), Selected Papers of the Eighth Foreign Language Conference across the Strait. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, pp. 229–239.Google Scholar
Zha, M. 2018. ‘Yingyu zhuanye de kunjing yu chulu. [The predicament of and solution for the English major.]’ Dangdai Waiyu Yanjiu [Contemporary Foreign Language Research], 6, 10–15.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. 2003. ‘Waiyu jiaoyu zhongde gongyong zhuyi yu renwen zhuyi. [Utilitarianism and humanism in foreign language education.]’ Waiyu Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research], 6, 453–457.Google Scholar