Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:52:43.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

This here town: evidence for the development of the English determiner system from a vernacular demonstrative construction in York English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2017

LAURA RUPP  and
SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
LAURA RUPP
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam, NL 1081 HV, The [email protected]
SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Sid Smith Hall, Room 4077, 4th Floor, 100 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The English variety spoken in York provides a unique opportunity to study the evolution of the English determiner system as proposed in the Definiteness Cycle (Lyons 1999). York English has three vernacular determiners that appear to represent different stages in the cycle: the zero article, reduced determiners and complex demonstratives of the type this here NP (Rupp 2007; Tagliamonte & Roeder 2009). Here, we probe the emergence and function of demonstratives in the cycle from the joint perspective of language variation and change, historical linguistics and discourse-pragmatics. We will argue that initially, the demonstrative reduced in meaning (Millar 2000) and also in form, resulting in Demonstrative Reduction (DR) (previously known as Definite Article Reduction (DAR)). This caused it to become reinforced. Data from the York English Corpus (Tagliamonte 1996–8) and historical corpora suggest that the use of complex demonstratives was subsequently extended from conveying ‘regular’ deictic meanings to a new meaning of ‘psychological deixis’ (Johannessen 2006). We conclude that survival of transitory stages in the cycle by several historical demonstrative forms, each in a range of functions, has given rise to a particular sense of ‘layering’ (Hopper 1991). Our analysis corroborates the idea that grammaticalization trajectories can be influenced by discourse-pragmatic factors (Epstein 1995; Traugott's 1995subjectification).

Keywords

York EnglishDefiniteness Cyclecomplex demonstrativeDefinite Article Reductionsubjectification
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 81 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The second author gratefully acknowledges the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of the United Kingdom for Research Grants 1997–2001. We thank Gea Dreschler, Anthony Warner and our anonymous reviewers at English Language and Linguistics for their valuable input to this manuscript.

References

Barry, Michael V. 1972. The morphemic distribution of the definite article in contemporary regional English. In Wakelin, Martyn F. (ed.), Patterns in the folkspeech of the British Isles, 164–81. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Judy B. 1997. Demonstratives and reinforcers in Romance and Germanic languages. Lingua 102, 87–113.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1962. Die Englische Sprache: Ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung, 2nd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
CheshireJenny, L. Jenny, L. & Edwards, Vivian K. 1989. The Survey of British Dialect Grammar. In Cheshire, Jenny L., Edwards, Vivian K., Münstermann, Henk & Weltens, Bert H. G. (eds.), Dialect and education: Some European perspectives, 200–15. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Christophersen, Paul 1939. The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. Definite articles in Scandinavian: Competing grammaticalization processes in standard and non-standard varieties. In Kortmann, Bernd C. (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 147–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, Diller, Hans-Jürgen & Tyrkkö, Jukka. 2013. Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0. perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/clmet3_0.htm (accessed 18 August 2016).Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993. The internal structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian languages. PhD thesis, University of Lund.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17, 463–89.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2012. Deixis and demonstratives. In Maienborn, Claudia, von Heusinger, Klaus & Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, 1–25. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ecay, Aaron. 2015. The Penn–York Computer-annotated Corpus of a Large Amount of English based on the TCP (PYCCLE-TCP). https://github.com/uoy-linguistics/pyccle (accessed 18 August 2016).Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1994. The development of the definite article in French. In Pagliuca, William (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 63–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1995. The later stages in the development of the definite article: Evidence from French. In Andersen, Henning (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1993, 159–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard 2011. The distal demonstrative as discourse marker in Beowulf. English Language and Linguistics 15, 113–35.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H. 1981. York, 1831–1981: 150 years of scientific endeavor and social change. York: Ebor Press.Google Scholar
Gelderen, van Elly. 2007. The Definiteness Cycle in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19, 275–308.Google Scholar
Givon, Thomas. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jospeh H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles A. & Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 3: Word structure, 47–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge & Mikkelsen, Line. 2002. A morphological analysis of definite nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14, 137–75.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin B. 1980. The marking of Definiteness: A diachronic perspective. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Labrum, Rebecca & Sheperd, Susan (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 75–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk, Hamilton, Sarah & Vacovsky, Sarah. 2011. The fall of demonstrative them: Evidence from Appalachia. English World-Wide 32, 74–103.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, J. Otto H. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: Horst.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne B. 2006. Just any pronoun anywhere? Pronouns and ‘new demonstratives’ in Norwegian. In Solstad, Torgrim, Grønn, Alte & Haug, Dag (eds.), A festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø, 91–106. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Jones, William E. 1952. The definite article in living Yorkshire dialect. Leeds Studies in English 7–8, 81–91.Google Scholar
JonesMark, J. Mark, J. 1999. The phonology of definite article reduction. In Upton, Clive & Wales, Katie (eds.), Dialectal variation in English: Proceedings of the Harold Orton Centenary Conference 1998. Leeds Studies in English 30, 103–21.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark J. 2002. The origin of definite article reduction in northern English dialects: Evidence from dialect allomorphy. English Language and Linguistics 6, 325–45.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard E. 2004. Here and there. In Leclère, Christian, Laporte, Éric, Piot, Mireille & Silberztein, Max (eds.), Lexique, syntaxe et lexique-grammaire / Syntax, lexis & lexicongrammar: Papers in honour of Maurice Gross, 253–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani. 2000. The origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact? In Tristam, H. (ed.), Celtic Englishes II, 329–46. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. The Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche-release-2016/PPCME2-RELEASE-4 (accessed 18 August 2016).Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret. 2013. A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1325, version 3.2. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2.html. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh (accessed 6 May 2016).Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincolm.Google Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2007. These HERE demonstratives. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13, 141–53.Google Scholar
Lodge, Ken. 2010. Th'interpretation of t'definite article in t'North of England. English Language and Linguistics 14, 111–27.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, Robert McColl. 2000. System collapse system rebirth: The demonstrative pronouns of English 900–1350 and the birth of the definite article. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold & Dieth, Eugen (eds.). 1962–71. Survey of English dialects: The basic material, 4 vols. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn. 1989. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. On the inferencing of indefinite this NPs. In Joshi, Aravind, Webber, Bonnie & Sag, Ivan (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, 231–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rupp, Laura 2007. The (socio-)linguistic cycle of Definite Article Reduction. Folia Linguistic Historica 28, 215–49.Google Scholar
Rupp, Laura & Page-Verhoeff, Hanne. 2005. Pragmatic and historical aspects of Definite Article Reduction in northern English dialects. English World-Wide 26, 325–46.Google Scholar
Rupp, Laura & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. Forthcoming. It's in t’ kitchen: Evidence for demonstrative reduction (DR) from York English.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 1996–8. Roots of identity: Variation and grammaticization in contemporary British English. Economic and Social Sciences Research Council (ESRC) of Great Britain. Reference no. R000221842.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 1998. Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change 10, 153–91.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2013–18. Social determinants of linguistic systems. Insight Grant: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Ito, Rika 2002. Think really different: Continuity and specialization in the English adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6, 236–66.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Roeder, Rebecca V.. 2009. Variation in the English definite article: Socio-historical linguistic in t'speech community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13, 435–71.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., Smith, Jennifer & Lawrence, Helen. 2005. No taming the vernacular! Insights from the relatives in northern Britain. Language Variation and Change 17, 75–112.Google Scholar
Taylor, Anne, Nurmi, Arja, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. York: University of York and Helsinki: University of Helsinki. www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/PCEEC-manual (accessed 18 August 2016).Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, Winfred P. & Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1992. Syntax. In Hogg, Richard M. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1: The beginnings to 1066, 186–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Suzan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation in language, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
TraugottElizabeth, C. Elizabeth, C. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification. In Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Köning, Ekkehard. 1991 Approaches to grammaticalization, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein A. 1999. The identification of functional architecture. PhD thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein A. 2004. Rolling up the Scandinavian noun phrase. Presented at GLOW 27, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Vizitelly, Frank H. 1906. A desk-book of errors in English. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.Google Scholar
Wenham, Leslie P. 1971. York. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph. 1905. The English dialect grammar. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar