Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:48:00.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The syntax of PP-adverbs within English determiner phrases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2020

MUTEB ALQARNI Open the ORCID record for MUTEB ALQARNI [Opens in a new window]
MUTEB ALQARNI*
Affiliation:
King Khalid University, College of Science and Arts, Tanuma, PO Box 250, 69889, Abha, Asir, Saudi Arabia, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current article explores the distribution of PP-adverbs, such as this month, this year etc., within English determiner phrases. Examples extracted from English newspapers show that PP-adverbs surprisingly separate head nouns from their PP-complements (i.e. of-phrases), e.g. the election this month of the first female president. At other times, PP-adverbs follow PP-complements, e.g. the election of the first female president this month. Assuming that these PP-adverbs have a null preposition (Larson 1985; McCawley 1988; Caponigro & Pearl 2008, 2009; Shun'ichiro 2013), I put forward three possible syntactic analyses to account for the examples above: (i) adjunction of both the PP-complement and the PP-adverb; (ii) leftward movement of the head noun or the noun phrase; and (iii) rightward movement of the PP-complement. Following Stowell (1981), Higginbotham (1983) and Anderson (1984), the adjunction proposal argues that both PP-adverbs and of-phrases are adjuncts, thus being freely ordered in the nominal hierarchy (Bresnan 1982; Svenonius 1994; Stroik & Putnam 2013). In contrast, the leftward movement analysis respects Kayne's (1994) Antisymmetric Theory of Linearization and argues that the of-phrase in the examples above is still a genuine complement, but the head noun, or sometimes the noun phrase, moves leftwards to a position higher than spec,FP where PP-adverbs are situated. As for the rightward movement account, it follows the leftward movement in treating the of-phrase as a complement but differs in that it extraposes the PP-complement outside PP-adverbs and right-adjoins it inside the DP. The article shows that the first two proposals are untenable, and sometimes cannot derive the wanted data. The third account is superior in that it accounts for the required data as well as other island-sensitive facts.

Keywords

PP-adverbsargument structureextrapositionadjunction
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 325 - 345
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Eric Potsdam for his insightful suggestions and to the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback. All remaining errors are my own.

References

Alexiadou, Artemis. 1994. Issues in the syntax of adverbs. PhD dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 1997. Adverb placement: A case study in antisymmetric syntax. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex. 1996. The role of argument structure in grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Anderson, Mona. 1984. Prenominal genitive NPs. The Linguistic Review 3(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Chris & Dowty, David. 1993. Non-verbal thematic proto-roles. In Schafer, Amy J. (ed.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 23, 49–62. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations. In Moore, John & Polinsky, Maria (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory, 31–68. Stanford, CA: CSLI, and Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, vol. I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Traugott, Elizabeth. 2006. The lady was al demonyak: Historical aspects of adverb all. English Language and Linguistics 10(2), 345–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano & Pearl, Lisa. 2008. Silent prepositions: Evidence from free relatives. In Asbury, Anna, Dotlačil, Jakub, Gehrke, Beri & Nouwen, Rick (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 365–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano & Pearl, Lisa. 2009. The nominal nature of where, when, and how: Evidence from free relatives. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1), 155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2007. Home sweet home. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics 1, 1–34.Google Scholar
Cowan, Ron. 2008. The teacher's grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert. 2005. A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1989. On the semantic content of the notion of thematic role. In Chierchia, Gennaro, Partee, Barbara H. & Turner, Raymond (eds.), Properties, types, and meaning II, 69–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3), 547–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2013. Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1987. The invisible category principle. Linguistic Inquiry 18(4), 613–32.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 1984. Towards an integrated theory of adverb position in English. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1993. Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1999. Arabic modifying adjectives and DP structures. Studia Linguistica 53(2), 105–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Jingin, Roeper, Thomas & Borer, Hagit. 1995. The VP within nominalizations: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do-so. MS, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz. 2012. The morphology of -ly and the categorial status of adverbs in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3), 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1991. The syntax of noun phrases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Nelson, Gerald. 2002. An introduction to English grammar. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guz, Wojciech. 2014. Non-ly adverbs in preverbal position: the case of fast. English Language and Linguistics 18(1), 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazout, Ilan. 1991. Verbal nouns: θ-theoretical studies in Hebrew and Arabic. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Hazout, Ilan. 1995. Action nominalizations and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13(3), 355–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1983. Logical form, binding and nominals. Linguistic Inquiry 14(3), 395–420.Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. On external arguments. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17, 103–30.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1985. Bare-NP adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16(4), 595–621.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–91.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2006. A glossary of English grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Hovav, Malka. 2005. Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James. 1988. Adverbial NPs: bare or clad in see-through garb? Language 64(3), 583–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overfelt, Jason. 2015. Rightward movement: A study in locality. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Potsdam, Eric. 1999. A syntax for adverbs. In van Gelderen, Elly & Samiin, Vida (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-seventh Western Conference on Linguistics, 397–411. Fresno, CA: California State University.Google Scholar
Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 2004. The form of Semitic noun phrases. Lingua 114(12), 1465–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shun'ichiro, Inada. 2013. On the relativization of DP adverbs. English Linguistics 30(1), 223–42.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas & Putnam, Michael. 2013. The structural design of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 1994. The structural location of the attributive adjective. In Duncan, Eric, Farkas, Donka & Spaelti, Phillip (eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 439–54. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1988. The syntax of adverbs. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 280–310.Google Scholar
Trawinski, Beata. 2004. Towards licensing of adverbial noun phrases in HPSG. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 293–312.Google Scholar
Valois, Daniel. 1991. The internal syntax of DP. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek & Roeper, Thomas. 1998. Events and aspectual structure in derivational morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32, 175–220.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1993. A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas & Arnold, Jennifer. 2003. Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. Topics in English Linguistics 43(1), 119–54.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 1995. The semantic basis of argument structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Whitman, Neal. 2002. A categorical treatment of adverbial nouns. Journal of Linguistics 38(1), 561–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar