Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T09:46:28.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English syntax (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. x + 385 pp. ISBN 9781107032798

Review products

Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English syntax (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. x + 385 pp. ISBN 9781107032798

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2015

Marina Dossena
Marina Dossena*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature e Culture Straniere, University of Bergamo, Piazza Rosate, 2, 24129 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 163 - 168
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auer, Anita, Schreier, Daniel & Watts, Richard J. (eds.). 2015. Letter writing and language change (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41 (2), 104–34.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina (ed.). 2015. Transatlantic perspectives on Late Modern English (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 4). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2003. Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2007. Text types and the methodology of diachronic speech act analysis. In Fitzmaurice, Susan M. & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical pragmatics: What it is and how to do it, 139–66. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin & Amador-Moreno, Carolina P.. 2014. ‘[The Irish] find much difficulty in these auxiliaries [. . .], putting will for shall with the first person’: The decline of first-person shall in Ireland, 1760–1890. English Language and Linguistics 18, 407–29.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (ed.). 2008. Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in eighteenth-century England. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar