We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Lea Kawaletz , The semantics of English -ment nominalizations (Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax 12). Berlin: Language Science Press, 2023. Pp. viii + 203. ISBN 9783985540709.
Review products
Lea Kawaletz , The semantics of English -ment nominalizations (Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax 12). Berlin: Language Science Press, 2023. Pp. viii + 203. ISBN 9783985540709.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
02 October 2024
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1992a. Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1992b. Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In Lehrer, Adrienne & Kittay, Eva Feder (eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts, 21–74. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2020. The roots of verbal meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. Event nominalizations: Proposals and problems. In Motsch, Wolfgang (ed.), Wortstruktur und Satzstruktur, 1–73. Berlin: ZISW, Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 2009. Nominalization – lexical and syntactic aspects. In Giannakidou, Anastasia & Rathert, Monika (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 281–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kipper-Schuler, Karin. 2005. VerbNet: A broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2016. English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, Wiebke. 2007. Representation of concepts as frames. In Skilters, Jurgis, Toccafondi, Fiorenza & Stemberger, Gerhard (eds.), Complex cognition and qualitative science: A legacy of Oswald Kulpe, 151–70. Riga: University of Latvia Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1998. The semantics of lexical underspecification. Folia Linguistica32(3–4), 323–47.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In Butt, Miriam & Geuder, Wilhelm (eds.), The projection of arguments, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D.Jr.2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar