Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-fcbfl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-26T01:48:30.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Joan C. Beal, Morana Lukač and Robin Straaijer (eds.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic prescriptivism (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). London: Routledge, 2023. Pp. xxxii + 470. IBSN 9780367557843.

Review products

Joan C. Beal, Morana Lukač and Robin Straaijer (eds.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic prescriptivism (Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics). London: Routledge, 2023. Pp. xxxii + 470. IBSN 9780367557843.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2025

Thomas Poulton Open the ORCID record for Thomas Poulton [Opens in a new window]
Thomas Poulton*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University LaTTiCe – Langues, Textes, Traitements informatiques et Cognition (UMR 8094) CNRS – École Normale Supérieure – Sorbonne Nouvelle ENS, 1 rue Maurice Arnoux 92120 Montrouge France [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
English Language & Linguistics , First View , pp. 1 - 7
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, Deborah. 1994. Verbal hygiene for women: Linguistics misapplied? Applied Linguistics 15(4), 382–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.4.382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzens, Vicki, Gaby, Alice & Stebbins, Tonya. 2020. Standardise this! Prescriptivism and resistance to standardization in language revitalization. In Allan, Keith (ed.), Dynamics of language changes, 37–55. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6430-7_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kickham, Elizabeth A. 2015. Purism, prescriptivism, and privilege: Choctaw language ideologies and their impact on teaching and learning. PhD thesis, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Kohlberger, Martin. 2016. Prescriptivism as a nation-building tool in the Upper Amazon: The case of Shiwiar. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 37(3), 263–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1068785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malory, Beth. 2024. Pinpointing prescriptive impact: Using change point analysis for the study of prescriptivism at the idiolectal level. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 29(2), 131–54. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22001.malCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moschonas, Spiros A. 2022. Detecting prescriptivism’s effects on language change: The corpus-linguistic approach. In Lavidas, Nikolaos & Nikiforidou, Kiki (eds.), Studying language change in the 21st century: Theory and methodologies, vol. 16, 315–57. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004510579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snoddon, Kristin & De Meulder, Maartje. 2020. Introduction: Ideologies in sign language vitality and revitalization. Language & Communication 74, 154–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winer, Lise. 2012. Susu not Sousou: Nationalism, prescriptivism and etymology in a postcolonial Creole language orthography. In Percy, Carol & Davidson, Mary Catherine (eds.), The languages of nation, 223–42. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847697813-015Google Scholar