Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:04:09.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jeremy J. Smith, Sound change and the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007. ISBN 978-0-19-929195-3.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Robert P. Stockwell
Robert P. Stockwell*
Affiliation:
1929 Manning Ave. #301, Los Angeles, CA [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , November 2008 , pp. 543 - 549
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daunt, Marjorie. 1939. Old English sound changes reconsidered in relation to scribal tradition and practice. Transactions of the Philological Society. 108–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 1992. The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 1: The Beginnings to 1066, phonology and morphology. = CHEL-1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 1992. A grammar of Old English, vol. 1: Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 1982. The environment for open syllable lengthening in Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica, 3, 29–58.Google Scholar
Samuels, Michael. 1972. Linguistic evolution, with special reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P. & Barritt, C. W.. 1951. Some Old English graphemic-phonemic correspondences – ae, ea, and a. Washington, DC: Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 4.Google Scholar
White, David. 2004. Why we should not believe in short diphthongs. In Curzan, Anne & Emmons, Kimberly (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II: Unfolding conversations. = SHEL-2, 57–84. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar