Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:33:30.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds.). Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing medicine in the eighteenth century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. Pp. xix + 432. ISBN 9789027203229.

Review products

Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds.). Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing medicine in the eighteenth century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2019. Pp. xix + 432. ISBN 9789027203229.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2022

Isabel Moskowich*
Affiliation:
University of A Coruña
*
Facultade de Filoloxía Campus da Zapateira s/n 15071 A Coruña Spain [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Author, 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crespo, Begoña & Moskowich, Isabel. 2020. Astronomy, philosophy, life sciences and history texts: Setting the scene for the study of modern scientific writing. English Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2020.1798635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronick, David Abraham. 1994. Medical ‘publishing societies’ in eighteenth-century Britain. Bulletin of the American Library Association 82(3), 277–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Marttila, Ville. 2014. Creating digital editions for corpus linguistics: The case of Potage Dyvers, a family of six Middle English recipe collections. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel & López, Javier Parapar. 2008. Writing science, compiling science: The Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing. In Lorenzo Modia, María Jesús (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st AEDEAN Conference, 531–44. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Puente-Castelo, Luis & Monaco, Leida Maria. 2016. ‘It is proper subserviently, to inquire into the nature of experimental chemistry’: Difficulties to harmonize disciplinary particularities and compilation criteria during the selection of samples for CECheT. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics 1, 351–60. https://easychair.org/publications/paper/66NcGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, Fanego, Teresa, López-Couso, María José, Méndez-Naya, Belén & Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma. 2016. Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR). University of Santiago de Compostela: Research Unit for Variation, Linguistic Change and Grammaticalization, Department of English and German. www.usc-vlcg.es/CHELAR.htmGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2016. Genre dynamics in the history of English. In Kytö, Merja & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics, 271–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi. 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus description and studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Adrian. 1990. The politics of medical improvement in Hanoverian London. In Cunningham, Andrew & French, Roger (eds.), The medical enlightenment of the eighteenth century, 439. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar