Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T20:53:45.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ilse Depraetere, Bert Cappelle, Martin Hilpert, Ludovic De Cuypere, Mathieu Dehouck, Pascal Denis, Susanne Flach, Natalia Grabar, Cyril Grandin, Thierry Hamon, Clemens Hufeld, Benoît Leclerq and Hans-Jörg Schmid, Models of modals: From pragmatics and corpus linguistics to machine learning (Topics in English Linguistics 110). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2023. Pp. viii + 274. ISBN 9783110738612.

Review products

Ilse Depraetere, Bert Cappelle, Martin Hilpert, Ludovic De Cuypere, Mathieu Dehouck, Pascal Denis, Susanne Flach, Natalia Grabar, Cyril Grandin, Thierry Hamon, Clemens Hufeld, Benoît Leclerq and Hans-Jörg Schmid, Models of modals: From pragmatics and corpus linguistics to machine learning (Topics in English Linguistics 110). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2023. Pp. viii + 274. ISBN 9783110738612.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

MARTA CARRETERO Open the ORCID record for MARTA CARRETERO [Opens in a new window]
MARTA CARRETERO*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Estudios Ingleses: Lingüística y Literatura Facultad de Filología Universidad Complutense de Madrid Plaza Menéndez Pelayo s/n 28040 Madrid Spain [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
English Language & Linguistics , First View , pp. 1 - 7
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boye, Kasper. 2023. Propositions and states of affairs: A cognitive linguistic approach. In Hartmann, Jutta M. & Wöllstein, Angelika (eds.), Propositionale Argumente im Sprachvergleich: Theorie und Empirie / Propositional arguments in cross-linguistic research: Theoretical and empirical issues, 85–114. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse. 2014. Modals and lexically-regulated saturation. Journal of Pragmatics 7, 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse & Reed, Susan. 2011. Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility. English Language and Linguistics 15(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg, Würschinger, Quirin, Fischer, Sebastian & Küchenhoff, Helmut. 2021. That’s cool. Computational sociolinguistic methods for investigating individual lexico-grammatical variation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3(89). https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.547531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Sadock, Jerrold M.. 1975. Ambiguity tests and how to fail them. In Kimball, John P. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar