Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:39:35.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Great big stories and tiny little changes: tautological size-adjective clusters in Present-day English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

VICTORINA GONZÁLEZ-DÍAZ
VICTORINA GONZÁLEZ-DÍAZ*
Affiliation:
Department of English, 19 Abercromby Square, School of the Arts, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This case study focuses on intensificatory tautological constructions (e.g. tiny littlebird, big hugepay rise). The attention that intensificatory tautology has elicited in previous literature is scarce and often centred on specific aspects of its Present-day English (PDE) distribution. Formally, tautological intensificatory patterns often involve the combination of two synonymous size-adjectives (e.g. massive great, tiny little) in a given order (i.e. great big but not big great). Functionally, they are standardly associated with emphatic descriptive modifying functions and informal styles (Matthews 2014: 364; Coffey 2013: 59; Huddleston & Pullum 2002: 561–2). This contribution takes a corpus-based, synchronic standpoint in order to (a) refine previous literature's account of the formal and functional distribution of tautological size-adjective clusters in PDE and (b) assess the significance of tautological intensification for functional–structural descriptions of the English Noun Phrase. The analyses indicate that PDE intensificatory size-adjective clusters have a wider functional distribution than has hitherto been observed, with reinforcer and adverbial intensifying functions slowly developing alongside the descriptive modifier functions. More generally, the article shows that tautological size-adjective clusters create pockets of interpersonal meanings whose impact on the formal and functional structure of the NP needs further exploration.

Keywords

tautological intensificationsize-adjective clusterEnglish Noun Phrase
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , November 2018 , pp. 499 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalisation in English, 39–6. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Arnaud, Pierre J. L., Ferragne, Emmanuel, Lewis, Diana M. & Maniez, François. 2008. Adjective+Noun sequences in attributive or NP-final positions: Observations on lexicalization. In Granger, Sylviane & Meunier, Fanny (eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective, 111–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bache, Carl. 1978. The order of premodifying adjectives in present-day English. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Benczes, Réka. 2014. Repetitions which are not repetitions: The non-redundant nature of tautological compounds. English Language and Linguistics 18 (3), 431–47.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Clark, Victoria. 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In Fanego, Teresa, José López-Couso, María & Pérez-Guerra, Javier (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2002. Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In Givón, Talmy & Malle, Bertram F. (eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language, 109–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carlier, Anne & Mulder, Walter De. 2010. The emergence of the definite article: Ille in competition with ipse in Late Latin. In Davidse, Vandelanotte & Cuykens (eds.), 241–76.Google Scholar
Coffey, Stephen. J. 2013. Sequences of size adjectives in text: Great big, tiny little, and less frequent combinations. In Hasselgård, Hilde, Ebeling, Jarle & Ebeling, Signe O. (eds.), Corpus perspectives on patterns of lexis, 47–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuyckens, Hubert. 2010a. Introduction. In Davidse, Vandelanotte & Cuykens (eds.), 1–28.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven & Cuykens, Hubert (eds.). 2010b. Subjectification, intersubjectification, and grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik & Verstraete, Jean-Christopher. 2006. Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17, 365–392.Google Scholar
Feist, Jim. 2012. Premodifiers in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2010. On the subjectification and intersubjectification paths followed by adjectives of completeness. In Davidse, Vandelanotte & Cuykens (eds.), 277–314.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2014. The directionality of (inter)subjectification in the English noun phrase: Pathways of change. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Davidse, Kristin & linden, Ann Van. 2013. Subjective compounds and subjectivity/subjectification in the English noun phrase. English Studies 94 (1), 90–117.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 2005. Associative adjectives in English and the lexicon–syntax interface. Journal of Linguistics 41 (3), 571–91.Google Scholar
González-Díaz, Victorina. 2010. Iconicity and subjectivisation in the NP: The case of little. In Conradie, Jac, Ronél, Johl, Beukes, Marthinus, Fischer, Olga & Ljunberg, Christina (eds.), Signergy (Iconicity in Language and Literature 9), 319–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Henny. 1998. Adverbs of degree in Dutch and related languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José. 2013. Exploring linguistic accretion: Middle English as a testing ground. Plenary lecture delivered at the 8th International Conference on Middle English (ICOME 8), University of Murcia.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter R. 1999. Adjective intensification: Learners versus native speakers: A corpus study of argumentative writing. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter R. 2002. Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the lexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 143–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In Jarvella, Robert J. & Klein, Wolfgang (eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics, 101–12. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1974. Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 2007. Syntactic relations: A critical survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 2009. On the micro-syntax of attributive adjectives. Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3), 358–75.Google Scholar
Mathews, Peter H. 2014. The positions of adjectives in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2008. On the history of downright. English Language and Linguistics (Special issue on intensifiers, ed. Belén Méndez-Naya) 12 (2), 267–87.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2015. Co-occurrence and iteration of intensifiers in early English: A case of linguistic attrition? Paper delivered at the ICAME 36 Conference, University of Trier.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary. 2014. English lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund. 1998. Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Lynne. 2003. Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy and other paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English (Lund Studies in English 92). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2000. Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalisation. In Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, Denison, David, Hogg, Richard & McCully, Chris B. (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 233–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peters, Hans. 1994. Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 269–88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Renner, Vincent. 2008. On the semantics of English coordinate compounds. English Studies 89 (5), 606–13.Google Scholar
Rubino, Carl. 2005. Reduplication: Form, function and distribution. In Hurch, Bernard (ed.), Studies on reduplication, 11–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2004. WordSmith tools version 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1995. Collocation and semantic profiles: On the cause of trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language 2 (1), 23–55.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. In Davidse, Vandelanotte & Cuykens (eds.), 29–70.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B.. 2005. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2002. Prenominal adjectives in English: Structures and ordering. Folia Linguistica 36, 219–59.Google Scholar
Vandewinkel, Sigi & Davidse, Kristin. 2008. The interlocking paths of development to emphasizer adjective pure. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9, 255–87.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Yian. 2004. Spatial demonstratives in English and Chinese: Text and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar