Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:31:13.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fricated realisations of /t/ in Dublin and Middlesbrough English: an acoustic analysis of plosive frication and surface fricative contrasts1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

MARK J. JONES  and
CARMEN LLAMAS
MARK J. JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, [email protected]
CARMEN LLAMAS
Affiliation:
Department of Language & Linguistic Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The frication of the voiceless plosives /p, t, k/ in word-final intervocalic position in Dublin and Middlesbrough English is examined in controlled data, and the acoustic characteristics of fricated realisations of /t/ are compared with other fricatives. The findings are that /t/ is not the only plosive to be fricated in the data sample, but does appear to differ from other plosives in terms of the regularity of frication and its nongradient character for some subjects. The realisation of fricated /t/ at both localities differs from that of other fricatives, and is probably perceptually distinct from other fricative contrasts at each locality, but is not identical across the two localities. On the basis of data presented here, it appears unlikely that fricated /t/ in Middlesbrough English is a direct transfer effect from the language of Irish immigrants to Middlesbrough.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , November 2008 , pp. 419 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, Laurie. 1988. What is lenition? Journal of Linguistics 24, 381–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., de Jong, Kenneth, Jun, Sun-Ah & Lee, Sook-Hyang. 1992. The interaction of coarticulation and prosody in sound change. Language and Speech 35, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrens, Susan & Blumstein, Sheila. 1988. On the role of amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84, 861–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Gillian. 1977. Listening to spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chase, Malcolm. 1995. The Teesside Irish in the nineteenth century. Cleveland History: The Bulletin of the Cleveland and Teesside Local History Society 69, 3–23.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. 1986. Sociolinguistic patterning in a New World dialect of Hiberno-English, the speech of St John's, Newfoundland. In Harris, John, Little, David, & Singleton, David (eds.). Perspectives on the English language in Ireland. Proceedings of the First Symposium on Hiberno-English, 67–81. Dublin: Centre for Language and Communication Studies, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail. 1993. Nasalization in English: phonology or phonetics. Phonology 10, 43–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerry & Foulkes, Paul. 1996. A corpus-based account of variation in the realisation of ‘released’ /t/ in English. In McCormack, Paul & Russell, Alison (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 157–62. Adelaide: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J. & Foulkes, Paul. 1999. Derby and Newcastle: instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. In Foulkes & Docherty (eds.), 47–71.Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1987. The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard (eds.). 1999. Urban voices. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Barthmaier, Paul & Sands, Kathy. 2002. A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32, 141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. A., Hamann, Silke & Zygis, Marzena. 2006. The phonetic motivation for phonological stop assibilation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36, 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 1984. Coronal segments in Irish English. Journal of Linguistics 20, 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 1986. Possible phonological parallels between Irish and Irish English. English World-Wide 7, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 1999. Dublin English, current changes and their motivation. In Foulkes & Docherty (eds.), 265–81.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2001. Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English. English Language and Linguistics 5, 213–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, George W. & Halle, Morris. 1956. Spectral properties of fricative consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28, 303–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor. 1968. Acoustical description of voiceless fricatives in terms of spectral parameters. In Jassem, Wiktor (ed.), Speech analysis and synthesis, 189–206. Warsaw: Państowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark J. & Llamas, Carmen. 2003. Fricated pre-aspirated /t/ in Middlesbrough English, an acoustic study. In Solé et al. (eds.), 655–8.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark J. & McDougall, Kirsty. 2006. A comparative acoustic study of Australian English fricated /t/, assessing the Irish (English) link. In Warren, Paul and Watson, Catherine I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 7–12. Auckland: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association. www.assta.org/sst/2006/sst2006-16.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jongman, Allard, Wayland, Ratree & Wong, Serena. 2000. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108, 1252–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallen, Jeffrey (ed.). 1997. Focus on Ireland. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1990. Phonetic representations in a generative grammar. Journal of Phonetics 18, 321–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hyunsoon. 2001. A phonetically based account of phonological stop assibilation. Phonology 18, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 2001. An effort based approach to consonant lenition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 2004. Consonant lenition. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 313–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Lisa M. 2001. Consonant strength: Phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavoie, Lisa M. 2002. Subphonemic and suballophonic consonant variation: the role of the phoneme inventory. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 28, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llamas, Carmen. 2001. Language variation and innovation in Teesside English. PhD dissertation, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Llamas, Carmen & Jones, Mark J.. 2006. Migration and language variation: Middlesbrough and Dublin compared. Paper presented at the International Conference on English Historical Linguistics 14, University of Bergamo.Google Scholar
Loakes, Deborah & McDougall, Kirsty. 2004. Frication of /k/ and /p/ in Australian English, inter- and intra-speaker variation. In Cassidy, Steve, Cox, Felicity, Mannell, Robert & Palethorpe, Sallyanne (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 171–6. Sydney: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association. www.assta.org/sst/2004/proceedings/papers/sst2004-373.pdfGoogle Scholar
Moosmüller, Sylvia & Ringen, Catherine. 2004. Voice and aspiration in Austrian German plosives. Folia Linguistica 38, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Scott. 2000. Boundary disputes: The distinction between phonetic and phonological sound patterns. In Burton-Roberts, Noel, Carr, Philip & Docherty, Gerard (eds.), Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, 245–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe. 1999. Irish. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 111–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe & Gobl, Christer. 1999. Voice source variation in the vowel as a function of consonantal context. In Hardcastle, William J. & Hewlett, Nigel (eds.), Coarticulation, 122–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, Katerina. 2001. An electropalatographic study of Greek spontaneous speech. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ó Baoill, Dónal P. 1990. Language contact in Ireland: the Irish phonological substratum in Irish-English. In Edmondson, Jerold A., Feagin, Crawford & Mühlhäusler, Peter (eds.), Development and diversity. Language variation across time and space, 147–72. Dallas: SIL and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Ó Baoill, Dónal P. 1997. The emerging Irish phonological substratum in Irish English. In Kallen (ed.), 73–88.Google Scholar
Ó hÚrdail, Roibeárd. 1997. Confusion of dentality and alveolarity in dialects of Hiberno-English. In Kallen (ed.), 133–52.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, María. 2004. Interplay between phonetic and inventory constraints in the degree of spirantization of voiced stops, comparing intervocalic /b/ and intervocalic /ɡ/ in Spanish and English. In Face, Timothy L. (ed.), Laboratory approaches to Spanish phonology, 237–53. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pandeli, Helen, Eska, Joseph F., Ball, Martin J. & Rahilly, Joan. 1997. Problems of phonetic transcription: the case of Hiberno-English slit-t. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangster, Catherine M. 2001. Lenition of alveolar stops in Liverpool English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5, 401–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadle, Christine H. 1990. Articulatory-acoustic relationships in fricative consonants. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 187–209. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadle, Christine H. 1997. The aerodynamics of speech. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 33–65. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shockey, Linda. 2003. Sound patterns of spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockey, Linda & Gibbon, Fiona. 1993. Stopless stops in connected English. Speech Research Laboratory University of Reading Work in Progress 7, 1–7.Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. 2001. Does articulatory reduction miss more patterns than it accounts for? Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep, Recasens, Daniel & Romero, Joaquín (eds.). 2003. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Barcelona: Causal Publications.Google Scholar
Sorianello, Patrizia. 2003. Spectral characteristics of voiceless fricative consonants in Florentine Italian. In Solé et al. (eds.), 3081–4.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Mary & Hajek, John. 2005. Spirantization of /p t k/ in Sienese Italian and so-called semi-fricatives. Proceedings of Interspeech 2005: 2893–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, Peter D. 1960. Spectra of fricative noise in human speech. Language and Speech 3, 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollfree, Laura. 2001. Variation and change in Australian English consonants: reduction of /t/. In Blair, David & Collins, Peter (eds.), English in Australia, 45–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Utman, Jennifer Aydelott & Blumstein, Sheila E.. 1994. The influence of language on the acoustic properties of phonetic features: a study of the feature [strident] in Ewe and English. Phonetica 51, 221–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dommelen, Wim. 2003. An acoustic analysis of Norwegian /ç/ and /ʃ/ as spoken by young people. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33, 131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Dominic & Allen, William. 2003. Tyneside English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33, 267–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J. T. 2003. Integration or segregation? The Irish in Middlesbrough in the 1850s and 1860s. MA dissertation, Open University.Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C-L. 1999. Post-vocalic spirantization, typology and phonetic motivations. In Billings, Sabrina J., Boyle, John P. & Griffith, Aaron M. (eds.), Proceedings from the main session of the Chicago Linguistic Society's 35th meeting, 373–83. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar