Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:16:25.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The emergence of English reflexive verbs: an analysis based on the Oxford English Dictionary1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2014

PETER SIEMUND
PETER SIEMUND*
Affiliation:
Department of English and American Studies, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 6, 20146 Hamburg, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Present-Day English is generally assumed to possess only a handful of lexicalized reflexive verbs (absent oneself from, pride oneself on, etc.) and to use reflexive pronouns neither for the marking of motion middles nor the derivation of anticausative (decausative) verbs. Such middle uses of reflexive markers (non-argument reflexives) are widespread in other European languages. Based on corpus evidence, Geniušienė (1987), Peitsara (1997) and Siemund (2010) demonstrate that English reflexive pronouns do occur in these functions and offer extensive lists of the verbs involved. I here follow up the historical development of these verbs from Middle English to Present-Day English. My analysis is based on a survey of the relevant verb entries in the Oxford English Dictionary (222 verbs), complemented by an examination of the OED quotation base. My study shows that the number of reflexive verbs in English has gradually, but steadily, increased since the emergence of complex reflexives (myself, yourself, etc.) in Middle English. They often result from lexicalization processes, but the data also show more regular patterns indicative of grammatical processes. The Oxford English Dictionary proves to be a rich and highly valuable data source for carrying out serious grammatical analyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 49 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank Charlotte Brewer, Hans-Olav Enger, Volker Gast, Ekkehard König and John Simpson for very helpful feedback on an earlier version of this paper. Moreover, I am extremely grateful to Maike Berger and Hanne Brandt for their help in retrieving the data. Last but not least, I would like to acknowledge the constructive and challenging criticism of two anonymous ELL referees and the excellent editorial support. All remaining errors are my own.

References

Baker, Carl L. 1995. Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 71, 63–101.Google Scholar
Brewer, Charlotte. 2007. Treasure-house of the language: The living OED. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel & Traugott, Elizabeth. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2005. Binding theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Taegoo. 2003. Reflexive constructions in English. Studies in Generative Grammar 13 (3), 461–80.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2008. Grammaticalization: from syntax to morphology. In Booij, Geert E., Lehmann, Christian, Mugdan, Joachim & Skopeteas, Stavros (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, 1590–9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2002. The story of Scandinavian -s(t) retold: Grammaticalising a clitic to a derivational affix. Folia Linguistica Historica 23 (1–2), 79–105.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav & Nesset, Tore. 1999. The value of cognitive grammar in typological studies: The case of Norwegian and Russian passive, middle and reflexive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22, 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faltz, Leonard M. 1985. Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1989. On the ‘reflexive middle’ in English. Chicago Linguistics Society 25, 123–32.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker. 2006. The grammar of identity: Intensifiers and reflexives in Germanic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elli van. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns: Person, self, and interpretability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma. 1987. The typology of reflexives. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14, 25–72.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Wiemer, Bjoern (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2004. Using the OED quotations database as a corpus: A linguistic appraisal. ICAME Journal 28, 17–30.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2005. Grammaticalization and English complex prepositions: A corpus-based study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth. 2006. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iyeiri, Yoko. 2010. Verbs of implicit negation and their complements in the history of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Ingrid. 2004. Medium und Reflexiv: Eine Studie zur Verbsemantik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter. 2000a. Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Curl, Traci (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions, 41–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter. 2000b. The development of complex reflexives and intensifiers in English. Diachronica 17, 39–84.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter. 2000c. Locally free self-forms, logophoricity and intensification in English. English Language and Linguistics 4 (2), 183–204.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter. 2005. Intensifiers and reflexives. In Dryer, Matthew, Haspelmath, Martin, Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.), World atlas of language structures, 194–7. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kunze, Jürgen. 1996. Plain middles and lassen middles in German: Reflexive constructions and sentence perspective. Linguistics 34, 645–97.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Wischer, Ilse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2004. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Statistics, frequencies and beyond. In Lindquist, Hans & Mair, Christian (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 121–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Peitsara, Kirsti. 1997. The development of reflexive strategies in English. In Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja & Heikkonen, Kirsi (eds.), Grammaticalization at work: Studies of long-term developments in English, 277–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 657–720.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2000. Intensifiers: A comparison of English and German. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2002. Reflexive and intensive self-forms across varieties of English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 50 (3), 250–68.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2010. Grammaticalization, lexicalization and intensification: English itself as a marker of middle situation types. Linguistics 48 (4), 797–836.Google Scholar
Simpson, John & Weiner, Edmund (eds.). 1989. The Oxford English dictionary, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, www.oed.com.Google Scholar
Steinbach, Markus. 2002. Middle voice: A comparative study in the syntax–semantics interface of German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. Preface. In Closs Traugott, Elizabeth & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65, 695–727.Google Scholar