Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:40:38.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

D. Stein & S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Pp. viii + 230. £35, US$54.95, ISBN 0 521 47039 0.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2008

Leiv Egil Breivik
Leiv Egil Breivik
Affiliation:
Department of EnglishUniversity of BergenSydnesplassen 7N-5007 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 199 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Breivik, L. E. (1981). On the interpretation of existential there. Language 57: 1–25.Google Scholar
Breivik, L. E. (1989). On the causes of syntactic change in English. In Breivik, L. E. & Jahr, E. H. (eds.), Language change: contributions to the study of its causes. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 29–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartvigson, H. H. & Jakobsen, L. K. (1974). Inversion in present-day English. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, B. (1951). Inversion in English with special reference to the Early Modern English Period. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksells Boktryckeri.Google Scholar
Kohonen, V. (1978). On the development of English word order in religious prose around 1000 and 1200: a quantitative study of word order in context. Åbo: Åbo Akademi Foundation.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1985). Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1993a). Universals of construal. In Guenter, J. S., Kaiser, B. A., & Zoll, C. C. (eds.), Proceedings of the nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 447–63.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1993b). Reference point construction. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1–38.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic–pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 245–71.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1987). Literacy and language change: the special case of speech act verbs. In Langer, J. (ed.), Language, literacy, and culture: issues of society and schooling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 11–27.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & Dasher, R. (1987). On the historical relation between mental and speech act verbs in English and Japanese. In Ramat, A. G., Carrunba, O., & Bernini, G. (eds.), Papers from the seventh International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 561–73.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & König, E. (1991). The semantics–pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 189–218.Google Scholar