Alexiadou, Artemis & Wilder, Chris (eds.) 1998. Possessors, predicates, and movement in the determiner phrase. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altenberg, Bengt. 1982. The genitive v. the of construction: A study of syntactic variation in 17th century English. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Behagel, Otto. 1923. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, vol. I: Die Wortklassen und Wortformen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Behagel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, vol. IV: Wortstellung. Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1998. Possession in Germanic. In Alexiadou, A. & Wilder, C. (eds.), Possessors, predicates, and movement in the determiner phrase, 78–108. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Demske, Ulrike. 2001. Merkmale und Relationen: Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des Deutschen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 2004. DP periphery and clausal periphery: possessor doubling in West Flemish. In Agder, D. et al. (eds.) Peripheris, 17–39. Utrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, Heinrich Matthias. 1954. Studien zum bestimmten Artikel in den germanischen Sprachen. Giessen: Schmitz.Google Scholar

Koike, Takeshi. 2004. The analysis of the genitive case in Old English within a Cognitive Grammar framework, based on the data from Ælfric's Catholic Homilies First Series. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics and English Language. University of Edimburgh.Google Scholar

Korne, Annet de & Tineke, Rinkel. 1987. Cursus zestiende- en zeventiendeëeuws Nederlands. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunnally, Thomas E. 1985. The syntax of the genitive in Old, Middle, and Early Modern English. PhD thesis, University of Georgia.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. 1992. Possessive and the distinction between determiners and modifier (with special reference to German). Journal of Linguistics 28, 453–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramat, Paolo. 1986. The Germanic possessive type dem Vater sein Haus. In Kastovsky, D. & Szwedek, A. (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, vol. 1, pp. 579–90. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbach, Anette. 2002. Genitive variation in English: Conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stahl, Leon. 1927. Der adnominal Genitiv und sein Ersatz im Mittelenglischen und Frühneuenglischen. Giessener Beiträge 3, 1–35.Google Scholar

Strunk, Jan. 2004. Possessive constructions in Modern Low Saxon. MA thesis, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 1996. Possessives in English: An exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford and NewYork: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toivonen, Ida. 2001. The phrase structure of non-projecting words. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Vezzosi, Letizia. 2000. John his book vs John's book: Possession marking in English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 15, 168–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weerman, Fred & de Wit, Petra. 1999. The decline of the genitive in Dutch. Linguistics 37, 1155–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wit, Petra de. 1997. Genitive case and genitive constructions. Utrecht: UiL OTS Dissertation Series.Google Scholar