We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l
Total loading time: 0
Render date: 2025-04-26T02:23:27.811Z
Has data issue: false
hasContentIssue false
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Haspelmath, Martin. 1996. Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995, 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.et al.2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malouf, Robert. 2000. Mixed categories in the hierarchical lexicon. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical relatedness: A paradigm-based model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679928.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2016. Inflectional paradigms: Content and form at the syntax–morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar