Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:24:18.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Th'interpretation of t'definite article in t'North of England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2010

KEN LODGE
KEN LODGE*
Affiliation:
School of Language and Communication Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A non-standard form of the definite article is used by upwards of a million speakers every day and yet it has received little attention in terms of a phonological analysis. The most recent discussions have been a historical and contemporary survey, spectrographic investigations and sociolinguistic surveys. It is clearly a complex issue and has relevance to a number of theoretical questions, some of which are rarely addressed. We need to know the range of phonetic forms; the phonological distribution of the forms; the historical development and whether this helps with a synchronic analysis; and the number and nature of the lexical storage forms. The distribution varies between localities and between speakers; many speakers also use standard English the. The historical development is not at all clear, but does throw some light on what the synchronic grammars should be like. There appears to be a break between those grammars in which the phonetic forms of the definite article are predictable in terms of the phonological environment and those later grammars that have lexically specific forms. The changes that have taken place cannot be explained in terms of simple system-internal mechanisms and some knowledge of the sociohistorical background to the emergence of the new grammars is necessary. This article looks at historical sources from the mid seventeenth century onwards to try to determine the changes that have taken place in the northern dialects concerned, and proposes population movements and expansion as a determining factor in the changes that are in evidence. One possible scenario in terms of new-dialect formation during the nineteenth century is suggested. For the modern variants polysystemic, declarative grammars are proposed, with the possibility of grammar-switching under certain circumstances, such as repair or interaction with outsiders.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 111 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, W. H. 1849/n.d. The Lancashire Witches. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Ewen, C. J.. 1987. Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, M. 1972. The morphemic distribution of the definite article in contemporary regional English. In Wakelin, M. (ed.), Patterns in the folk speech of the British Isles, 164–81. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Bobbin, T. [John Collier]. 1746/1821. Tummus and Meary. Otley: William Walker.Google Scholar
Brontë, E. 1847/1956. Wuthering Heights. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Editions.Google Scholar
Cawley, A. C. (1959) (ed.). George Meriton's ‘A Yorkshire Dialogue’ (1683). Yorkshire Dialect Society reprint 2.Google Scholar
Gaskell, E. 1848/1906. Mary Barton. London: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Gaskell, E. 1855/1889. North and South. London: Smith, Elder & Co.Google Scholar
Griffin, E. 2009. A short history of the British industrial revolution. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hogg, R. 1992. The Cambridge history of English, vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, M. J. 2002a. The origin of Definite Article Reduction in northern dialects: Evidence from dialect allomorphy. English Language and Linguistics 6, 325–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. J. 2002b. The phonetics of Definite Article Reduction in Northern English dialects: a case study. Paper presented to the 2002 meeting of the British Association of Academic Phoneticians, Newcastle.Google Scholar
Jones, M. J. 2007. Glottals and grammar: Definite Article Reduction and morpheme boundaries. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 61–77.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. 1994. Babel in Buckinghamshire? Pre-school children acquiring accent features in the new town of Milton Keynes. In Melchers, G. & Johannesson, N.-L. (eds.), Non-standard varieties of language, 64–83. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. 1996. Milton Keynes and dialect levelling in south-eastern British English. In Graddol, D., Swann, J. & Leith, D. (eds.), English: history, diversity and change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. & Williams, A.. 2000. Creating a New Town koine. Language in Society 29, 65–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnaeus Banks, G. c. 1875/1901. The Manchester man, 11th edition. Manchester: Abel Heywood & Son.Google Scholar
Lodge, K. R. 1966. The Stockport dialect. Le Maître Phonétique 126, 26–30.Google Scholar
Lodge, K. R. 1978. A Stockport teenager. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 8, 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K. R. 1984. Studies in the phonology of colloquial English. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Lodge, K. R. 1992. Assimilation, deletion paths and underspecification. Journal of Linguistics 28, 13–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K. R. 2003. A declarative treatment of the phonetics and phonology of German rhymal /r/. Lingua 113, 931–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K. R. 2007. Timing, segmental status and aspiration in Icelandic. Transactions of the Philological Society 105, 66–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K. R. 2009. Fundamental concepts in phonology: Sameness and difference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. A. 1999. A declarative account of strong and weak auxiliaries in English. Phonology 16, 55–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, H. & Halliday, W. J.. 1962–3. Survey of English dialects, vol. I: The northern counties and Man. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar
Page, N. 1973. Speech in the novel. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Rupp, L. & Page-Verhoff, H.. 2005. Pragmatic and historical aspects of Definite Article Reduction in northern English dialects. English World-Wide 26, 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, M. (ed.). 1927. The works of Thomas Shadwell, vol. 4. London: The Fortune Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. & Roeder, R. V.. 2009. Variation in the English definite article: Socio-historical linguistics in t'speech community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13, 435–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. J. 1983. On dialect. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J. 2004. New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Upton, C., Parry, D. & Widdowson, J. D. A.. 1994. Survey of English Dialects: The dictionary and grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wales, K. 2006. Northern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar