Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:28:54.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil and Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Modality in English: Theory and description. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. Pp. vi + 384. ISBN 978-3-11-019634-4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2010

Peter Collins
Peter Collins*
Affiliation:
School of Languages and Linguistics, University of NSW, Sydney 2052, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 507 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coates, J. 1995. Root and epistemic possibility in English. In Aarts, B. & Meyer, C. (eds.), The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 145–56.Google Scholar
Collins, P. 2009. Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culioli, Antoine. 1990. Pour une linguistique de l'énonciation: opérations et représentations, vol 1. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Depraetere, I. & Reed, S.. 2006. Mood and modality in English. In Aarts, B. & McMahon, A. (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 269–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facchinetti, R., Krug, M. & Palmer, F.. 2003. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facchinetti, R. & Palmer, F.. 2004. English modality in perspective: Genre analysis and contrastive studies. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larreya, P. & Rivière, C.. 1999. Grammaire explicative de l'Anglais, new edn.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A. 2000. Modality: Issues in the semantics–pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar