Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:34:40.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The perception of dental and alveolar stops among speakers of Irish English and American English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2017

NIAMH E. KELLY
NIAMH E. KELLY*
Affiliation:
Department of English, 333 Fisk Hall, American University of Beirut, Beirut, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most speakers of Irish English use a dental stop for words containing <th>, a sound that is generally pronounced as [θ] and [ð], in other varieties of English (Wells 1982; Ó hÚrdail 1997). Alveolar stops [t,d] and dental stops [,] are articulatorily and acoustically similar, and thus it is unusual for a language to use them contrastively (e.g. Ladefoged 2001). Despite this, Irish English contrasts them and speakers of this dialect have no trouble distinguishing them. This raises the question as to whether speakers of a dialect which does not use this contrast can distinguish them. To investigate this, speakers of Irish English and American English participated in an identification task involving words produced by an Irish English speaker. American English speakers had a high accuracy but did significantly worse than Irish English speakers, and both groups did significantly worse when the contrast was in final position than when it was in initial position. A small-scale production experiment examined words with this contrast and the vowel /a/, with the finding that for speakers of both dialects, the vowel is longer in words ending in <th> than <t>. The findings are discussed in the context of linguistic experience, and the effect of surrounding consonants on vowel duration.

Keywords

perceptionstopsplosivesdentalalveolardialect variation
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 277 - 302
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The idea for this project came about during a conversation with Mark Aronoff. I would also like to thank Miquel Simonet for his workshop on how to use PsychoPy. Special thanks to Deirdre Kelly, who recorded the stimuli, and to all participants in Ireland and at the University of Texas at Austin. Finally, special thanks are due to the editor and reviewers, whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.

References

Aschmann, Rick. 2015. North American English dialects, based on pronunciation patterns. http://aschmann.net/AmEng/Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. 1994. The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman, J. C. & Nusbaum, H. C. (eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words, 167–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, Winifred (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 171–204. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. & Strange, Winifred. 1992. Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics 20, 305–30.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. & Tyler, M.. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Munro, Murray J. (eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2011. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 5.3.03. www.praat.orgGoogle Scholar
Cho, Taehong & Ladefoged, Peter. 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27, 207–9.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah N. 1991. Articulatory and acoustic qualities of apical and laminal articulations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah N. 1998. Comparing French and English coronal consonant articulation. Journal of Phonetics 26, 71–94.Google Scholar
DiCanio, C. T. 2012. Cross-linguistic perception of Itunyoso Trique tone. Journal of Phonetics 40 (5), 672–88.Google Scholar
van Dommelen, Wim A. & Husby, Olaf A.. 2009. Perception of Norwegian word tones by Chinese and German listeners. In Watkins, Michael A., Rauber, Andreia S. & Baptista, Barbara O. (eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology: Perception and production, 308–21. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Tamsin. 1980. Ngiyambaa, the language of the Wangaaybuwan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, Silvie & Horvath, Barbara M.. 1998. Let's tink about dat: Interdental fricatives in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 10, 245–61.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Christophe, P., Sebastian Galles, N. & Mehler, J.. 1997. A distressing deafness in French. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 406–21.Google Scholar
Edwards, Walter F. 2008. African American Vernacular English: Phonology. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English, vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, 181–91. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1984. The effect of linguistic experience on Arabs’ perception of the English /s/ vs. /z/ contrast. Folia Linguist, 18, 117–38.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Strange, Winifred (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues, 233–77. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L. & Fenn, K.. 2008. Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics 36, 268–94.Google Scholar
Frazier, Melissa. 2009. The production and perception of pitch and glottalization in Yucatec Maya. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. 2008. New York, Philadelphia, and other northern cities: Phonology. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English, vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, 67–86. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haowen, Jiang. 2010. Malayalam: A grammatical sketch and a text. Unpublished MS, Department of Linguistics, Rice University.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. M., Omar, Y. A. & Goesche, M.. 1989. Dental and alveolar stops in KiMvita Swahili: An electropalatographic study. African Languages and Cultures 2, 51–72.Google Scholar
Hazan, V. & Rosen, S.. 1991. Individual variability in the perception of cues to place contrasts in initial stops. Perception and Psychophysics 49, 187–200.Google Scholar
Heffner, R-M. S. 1940. A note on vowel length in American speech. Language 16 (1), 33–47.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 1984. Coronal segments in Irish English. Journal of Linguistics 20, 233–50.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2008. Irish English: Phonology. In Schneider, Edgar W., Burridge, Kate, Kortmann, Bernd, Mesthrie, Rajend & Upton, Clive Handbook of varieties of English, vol 1: Phonology, 71–105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
House, Arthur S. 1961. On vowel duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33, 1174–8.Google Scholar
House, Arthur S. & Fairbanks, Grant. 1953. The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 105–13.Google Scholar
Hughes, E. J. & Leeding, V. J.. 1971. The phonemes of Nunggubuyu. Papers on the Languages of Australian Aboriginals (Australian Aboriginal Studies) 38, 72–81.Google Scholar
Huttar, George L. & Kirton, Jean F.. 1981. Contrasts in Yanywa consonants. In Gonzalez, Andrew B. & Thomas, David (eds.), Linguistics across continents: Studies in honor of Richard S. Pittman. Manila: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Jongman, A., Blumstein, S. E. & Lahiri, A.. 1985. Acoustic properties for dental and alveolar stop consonants: A cross-language study. Journal of Phonetics 13, 235–51.Google Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L. 2005. Internal and external factors in phonological convergence: The case of English /t/ lenition. In Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 51–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L. 2013. Irish English, vol. 2: The Republic of Ireland. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kondaurova, Maria & Francis, Alexander L.. 2008. The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (6), 3959–71.Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K. 1991. Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics 50, 93–107.Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K., Williams, Karen A., Lacerda, Francisco, Stevens, Kenneth N. & Lindblom, Björn. 1992. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255, 606–8.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Lisa M. 2002. Subphonemic and suballophonic consonant variation: The role of the phoneme inventory. ZAS Papers in Phonetics 28, 39–54.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops. Word 20, 384–422.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. S.. 1970. The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 563–7. Prague.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1997. Phonetic universals. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 619–39. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mann, Virginia A. 1986. Distinguishing universal and language-dependent levels of speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners’ perception of English ‘l’ and ‘r’. Cognition 24, 169–96.Google Scholar
McAllister, R., Flege, J. & Piske, T.. 2002. The influence of the L1 on the acquisition of Swedish vowel quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics 30, 229–58.Google Scholar
McGuire, G. & Babel, M.. 2012. A cross-modal account for synchronic and diachronic patterns of /f/ and /θ/ in English. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 3, 251–72.Google Scholar
Morphy, F. 1983. Djapu, a Yolngu dialect. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Blake, Barry J. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, vol. 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi & Roberts, Julie. 2008. New England: Phonology. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English, vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, 52–66. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ó hÚrdail, R. 1997. Hiberno English: Historical background and synchronic features and variation. In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes, 180–200. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Pandeli, Helen, Eska, Joseph F. & Rahilly, Joan. 1997. Problems of phonetic transcription: The case of the Hiberno-English slit-t. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27, 65–75.Google Scholar
Peirce, J.W. 2007. PsychoPy – psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 162 (1-2), 8–13.Google Scholar
Peterson, G. E. & Lehiste, I.. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32, 693–703.Google Scholar
Polka, Linda. 1989. The role of experience in speech perception: Evidence from cross-language studies with adults. PhD thesis, University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Polka, Linda. 1991. Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 2961–77.Google Scholar
Pruitt, John S., Jenkins, James J. & Strange, Winifred. 2006. Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (3), 1684–96.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Raphael, L. J. 1972. Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51, 1296–1303.Google Scholar
Remijsen, Bert & Manyang, Caguor Adong. 2009. Luanyjang Dinka. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39 (1), 113–24.Google Scholar
Sokolović-Perović, M. 2009. Voicing-conditioned vowel duration in Southern Serbian. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 15, 126–37.Google Scholar
Strange, Winifred. 1992. Learning non-native phoneme contrasts: Interactions among subject, stimulus, and task variables. In Tohkura, Yoh'ichi, Vatikiotis-Bateson, Eric & Sagisaka, Yoshinori (eds.), Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure, 197–219. Tokyo: OHM.Google Scholar
Strange, Winifred. 1995. Cross-language studies of speech perception: An historical review. In Strange, Winifred (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues, 3–45. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2008. Rural Southern white accents. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English, vol. 2: The Americas and the Caribbean, 87–114. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English, vol. 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werker, Janet F. & Tees, Richard C.. 1984. Cross-Language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7, 49–63.Google Scholar
Xu, Yisheng, Gandour, Jackson T. & Francis, Alexander L.. 2006. Effects of language experience and stimulus complexity on categorical perception of pitch direction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (2), 1063–74.Google Scholar