Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:00:48.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Martin Hilpert, Construction Grammar and its application to English (Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014. Pp. xiii + 236. ISBN 978-0-7486-7584-5.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2015

Jaakko Leino*
Affiliation:
Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, PO Box 3, 00014University of Helsinki, [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Lee-Goldman, Russell R. & Rhodes, Russell. 2012. The FrameNet Constructicon. In Boas, Hans C. & Sag, Ivan A. (eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar, 283–99. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (5), 219–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1992. An on-line computational model of human sentence interpretation: A theory of the representation and use of linguistic knowledge. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Computer Science Division Report #92/676.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1), 3974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1984. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2012. The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar