Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:46:17.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Complex numerals in English: constituents or not?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2022

CHUANSHENG HE  and
ONE-SOON HER Open the ORCID record for ONE-SOON HER [Opens in a new window]
CHUANSHENG HE
Affiliation:
Department of English and Institute of Language and Cognition, School of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha City, Hunan Province, China
ONE-SOON HER*
Affiliation:
Department of Foreign Languages and Literature, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
*
(Corresponding author) [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article focuses on the controversy over whether complex numerals in English are constituents. Contra the traditional view (e.g. Hurford 1975; Greenberg 1990 [1978]), the cascading structure proposed in Ionin & Matushansky (2006, 2018) maintains that cross-linguistically a complex numeral does not form a constituent to the exclusion of the NP complement. The derivation of an additive complex numeral, e.g. twenty-two people, thus involves an underlying source form with a nominal conjunction, e.g. twenty people and two people. Based on the argumentation established in He (2015) and He et al. (2017) supporting complex numerals as constituents in Chinese and minority languages in southern China, this article first demonstrates that the non-constituency analysis is not viable for English, as the underlying forms of additive complex numerals may be ill-formed and also not semantically equivalent to the surface forms. We then offer evidence to support the constituency analysis from constituency tests and behavior of post-numeral and pre-numeral modifiers. Finally, we demonstrate that the extra mechanism of grafting, proposed by Meinunger (2015), is unnecessary for English complex numerals.

Keywords

cardinalscomplex numeralscomplementationadditive complex numerals
Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 723 - 749
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors, 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are truly grateful to the three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions, which have helped us greatly in improving the article. However, we are solely responsible for any remaining errors. C.-S. He is grateful for grant no. 16YBA082 awarded by Hunan Provincial Social Sciences Fund. O.-S. Her gratefully acknowledges the grants awarded by Taiwan's Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST): 108-2410-H-029-062-MY3 and109-2811-H-004-522.

References

Abels, Klaus & Neeleman, Ad. 2012. Linear asymmetries and the LCA. Syntax 15(1), 25–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arregi, Karlos. 2010. The syntax of comparative numerals. Proceedings of NELS 40. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon & Cooper, Robin. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, vol. 1: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Greg N. 1987. Same and different: Some consequences for syntax and semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 531–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnie, Andrew. 2013. Syntax: A generative introduction, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg's Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3), 315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert & Zwarts, Joost. 2006. Prepositional numerals. Lingua 116, 811–35.Google Scholar
Danon, Gabi. 2012. Two structures for numeral-noun constructions. Lingua 122(12), 1282–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, Sheila & de Haan, Ferdinand. 2008. On the nature of the approximative expression NUM-odd. In Karimi, Simin, Harley, Heidi, Lewis, William D. & Farrar, Scott O. (eds.), Time and again: Theoretical and experimental perspectives on formal linguistics, 37–53. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven. 1994. Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12, 597–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1997. The categorial status of determiners. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 94–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1990. Generalizations about numeral systems. In Denning, Keith & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 271–309. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press (originally published in Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 3: Word structure, 249–95. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Hackl, Martin. 2000. Comparative quantifiers. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hamawand, Zeki. 2017. The notion of approximation in language. Cognitive Semantics 3(1), 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Chuansheng. 2015. Complex numerals in Mandarin Chinese are constituents. Lingua 164, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Chuansheng, Her, One-Soon, Hu, Xiaoshi & Zhu, Weijing. 2017. Overt coordination in additive numerals of minority languages in South China. Syntax 20(3), 292–316.Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon. 2017. Deriving classifier word order typology, or Greenberg's Universal 20A and Universal 20. Linguistics 55(2), 265–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Tsai, Hui-Chin. 2014. Color isn't silent, shallow isn't deep: Two case studies of evaluating silent elements. Language and Linguistics 15(6), 775–800.Google Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Tsai, Hui-Chin. 2015. On silent elements: A case study of grand and its silent entourage. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(2), 575–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Her, One-Soon & Tsai, Hui-Chin. 2020. Left is right, right is not: On the constituency of the classifier phrase in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 21(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto. 2005. Friends and colleagues: Plurality, coordination, and the structure of DP. Natural Language Semantics 13, 201–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Francis Roger. 1973. The pseudo-cleft construction in English. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hofweber, Thomas. 2005. Number determiners, numbers, and arithmetic. Philosophical Review 114(2), 179–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurford, James R. 1975. The linguistic theory of numerals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 1987. Language and number. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Matushansky, Ora. 2006. The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23, 315–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Matushansky, Ora. 2018. Cardinals: The syntax and semantics of cardinal-containing expressions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit. 1987. On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2005/2010. A note on the syntax of numerical bases. Reprinted in Comparisons and contrasts. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2012. A note on grand and its silent entourage. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33(2), 71–85.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Stavi, Jonathan. 1986. A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(3), 253–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1990. Four thousand ships passed through the lock: Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 487–520.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. Terence. 1978. The logic of reciprocity. Linguistic Inquiry 9, 177–97.Google Scholar
Meinunger, André. 2015. Complex numeral expressions: A plea for grafts. Syntax 18, 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 2011. Reference to numbers in natural language. Philosophical Studies 162(3), 499–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankau, Andreas. 2018. The structure of approximative numerals in German. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1), 21, 1–48. http://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. 1986. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Groenendijk, Jeroen, Jongh, Dick de & Stokhof, Martin (eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (GRASS 8), 115–43. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2004. Inevitable reanalysis: From local adpositions to approximative adnumerals, in German and wherever. Studies in Language 28(1), 165–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Rothstein, Susan (ed.), Perspectives on phrase structure: Heads and licensing. In Moulton, Keir (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 25, 37–62. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 2012. Numericals: Counting, measuring and classifying. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16(2), 527–42.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, Pawel. 2002. The syntax of quantifier phrases and the inherent vs. structural case distinction. Linguistic Research 7(1), 43–74.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Culicover, Peter W., Wasow, Thomas & Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal syntax, 285–316. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stavrou, Melita & Terzi, Arhonto. 2008. Types of numerical nouns. In Chang, Charles B. & Haynie, Hannah J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 429–37. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Pysz. 1994. The structural location of the attributive adjective. In Duncan, Eric, Farkas, Donka & Spaelti, Philip (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 439–54. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Talić, Aida. 2017. Long-form and short-form prenominal adjectives are not reduced relative clauses in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian (BCS). Linguistic Inquiry 48(1), 194–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2002. Prenominal adjectives in English: Structures and ordering. Folia Linguistica 36(3–4), 219–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Mengden, Ferdinand. 2010. Cardinal numerals: Old English from a cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweig, Eytan. 2006. Nouns and adjectives in numeral NPs. In Bateman, Leah & Ussery, Cherlon (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 35. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Google Scholar