Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:22:07.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2004

MARIANNE HUNDT
Affiliation:
Anglistisches Seminar, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Kettengasse 12, D - 69117 Heidelberg, [email protected]

Abstract

One aspect of the grammaticalization of the progressive is its spread in Modern English. Previous studies suggest that the progressive was initially restricted to animate or agentive subjects and spread to inanimate or nonagentive subjects only during the later stages of grammaticalization in Modern English. The article discusses the contextual variables – animacy and agentivity – that have been used in previous research. ARCHER – A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers – is then used (a) to verify the hypothesis that progressives increasingly co-occur with inanimate/nonagentive subjects in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, (b) to test the reliability and comparability of previous research, (c) to verify whether the weakening of the contextual constraint was a condition for or a result of the spread of the progressive form in the nineteenth century, and (d) to find out whether there are any regional differences between American and British English in the loss of the contextual constraint.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For comments on previous drafts of this article I am grateful to Lieselotte Anderwald, Carolin Biewer, David Denison, Christian Mair, Nadja Nesselhauf, Anette Rosenbach, and the reviewers of ELL.