Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:06:55.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An open-sesame approach to English noun phrases: defining the NP (with an introduction to the special issue)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2011

ANA ELINA MARTÍNEZ-INSUA  and
JAVIER PÉREZ-GUERRA
ANA ELINA MARTÍNEZ-INSUA
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Vigo, FFT, Campus Universitario, E–36310 Vigo, [email protected], [email protected]
JAVIER PÉREZ-GUERRA
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Vigo, FFT, Campus Universitario, E–36310 Vigo, [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The category of the noun phrase in English has received much attention in the literature. This article discusses the main defining features of the category from different theoretical angles. Issues such as its structural status, the determination and characterisation of its (morphosyntactic, semantic, cognitive) head, the structural slots which are available in the phrase, and the different possibilities as far as word order is concerned will be approached from structural, syntactic, functional and cognitive perspectives. In the second half of the article, after a review of recent literature on the English noun phrase, we offer a summary of the research included in this issue.

Type
Research Article
Information
English Language & Linguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 2: The structure of the noun phrase in English: synchronic and diachronic explorations , July 2011 , pp. 201 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, F. G. A. M. 2004. On the distribution of noun-phrase types in English clause-sentence. In Sampson, Geoffrey & McCarthy, Diana (eds.), Corpus linguistics: Readings in a widening discipline, 34–48. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalisation in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia & González-Díaz, Victorina. 2009. History and structure of the English noun phrase: Introduction. Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3), 255–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree words. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brame, Michael. 1982. The head-selector theory of lexical specifications and the nonexistence of coarse categories. Linguistic Analysis 10 (4), 321–5.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Coene, Martine & D'hulst, Yves. 2003a. Introduction: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases. Theoretical background. In Coene, Martine & D'hulst, Yves (eds.), From NP to DP, vol. 1: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases, 1–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Coene, Martine & D'hulst, Yves (eds.) 2003b. From NP to DP, vol. 2: The expression of possession in noun phrases. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin. 2009. Complete and sort of: from identifying to intensifying? Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3), 262–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Pieter. 1989. Postmodifying clauses in the English noun phrase: A corpus-based analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Pieter. 1991. On the exploration of corpus data by means of problem-oriented tagging: Postmodifying clauses in the English noun phrase. In Johansson, Stig & Stenström, Anna-Brita (eds.), English computer corpora: Selected papers and research guide, 51–65. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Mönnink, Inge. 2000. On the move: The mobility of constituents in the English noun phrase. A multi-method approach. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 4: 1776–1997, 92–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dik, S. C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar, part 1: The structure of the clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2004. Noun phrases without nouns. Functions of Language 11 (1), 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, Thomas. 2008. Non-finite complementation: A usage-based study of infinitive and -ing clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van Valin, Robert D.. 1984. Functional syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Speas, Margaret. 1986. Specifiers and projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 128–72.Google Scholar
García-Velasco, Daniel & Rijkhoff, Jan (eds.). 2008. The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1991a. Introduction. In Giorgi & Longobardi (eds.), 1–21.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1991b. NP parametrization: The head-subject hypothesis. In Giorgi & Longobardi (eds.), 113–75.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Longobardi, Giuseppe (eds.). 1991c. The syntax of noun phrases: Configuration, parameters and empty categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
González-Díaz, Victorina. 2009. Little old problems: Adjectives and subjectivity in the English NP. Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3), 376–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González Escribano, José Luis. 2008. On noun phrase structure in Functional (Discourse) Grammar: Some conceptual issues. In García-Velasco & Rijkhoff (eds.), 117–79.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Linguistics 25 (1): 127–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1990. The hierarchical structure of utterances. In Nuyts, Jan, Bolkestein, A. Machtelt & Vet, Co (eds.), Layers and levels of representation in language theory: A functional view, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2008. Prototypical and non-prototypical noun phrases in Functional Discourse Grammar. In García-Velasco & Rijkhoff (eds.), 43–62.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, John Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian F., Götz, Dieter & Klotz, Michael. 2004. A valency dictionary of English: A corpus-based analysis of the complementation patterns of English verbs, nouns and adjectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1990. English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2004. Are determiners heads? Functions of Language 11 (1), 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.). 1993. The noun phrase in English: Its structure and variability. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Sag, Ivan A.. 2009. Not as hard a problem to solve as you might have thought. Proceedings of the HPSG-09 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Online Publications.Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2007. The English noun phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2008. Reference and ascription in Functional Discourse Grammar: An inventory of problems and some possible solutions. In García-Velasco & Rijkhoff (eds.), 181–219.Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges. 2004. Peut-on sauver un sens de dénomination pour les noms propres? Functions of Language 11 (1), 115–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1932. A handbook of Present-day English, part II: English accidence and syntax. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2002 [1991]. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2004. Remarks on nominal grounding. Functions of Language 11 (1), 77–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 2007. Syntactic relations: A critical survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 2009. On the microsyntax of attributive adjectives. Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3), 358–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2000. Reinforcing adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalization. In Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, Denison, David, Hogg, Richard & McCully, Christopher (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies: A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 233–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Payne, John. 2009. The English genitive and double case. Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3), 322–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Huddleston & Pullum et al., 323–523.Google Scholar
Purver, Matthew & Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2004. Clarifying noun phrase semantics. Journal of Semantics 21 (3), 283–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 1990. Explaining word order in the noun phrase. Linguistics 28 (1), 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. The noun phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2008. Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In García-Velasco & Rijkhoff (eds.), 63–115.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günther. 1996. Cognitive complexity and grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7 (2), 149–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani. 1989. Complementation and Case Grammar: A syntactic and semantic study of selected patterns of complementation in Present-day English. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John et al. . (eds.). 1990. The Collins COBUILD English Grammar. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek. 2009. Do we need a category of postdeterminer in the NP? Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3), 293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eynde, Frank. 2006. NP-internal agreement and the structure of the noun phrase. Journal of Linguistics 42 (1), 139–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eynde, Frank. 2007. The Big Mess Construction. In Müller, Stefan (ed.), The proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 415–33. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy. 1994. Determiners as heads? Cognitive Linguistics 5 (3), 243–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar