No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Single-sex classes in a Queensland primary school: An evaluation of outcomes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2015
Abstract
Although numerous studies have considered the benefits of single-sex schooling for secondary students, the results have open been inconclusive or inconsistent. Very few studies have considered the effects of single-sex schooling at the primary level. This paper reports a trial of single-sex Year 7 classes at a Queensland primary school. Measures of academic achievement (number facts, spelling, reading, and mathematics) and teachers’ reports of children’s classroom involvement and motivation were obtained prior to the formation of classes and again at the end of the trial year. Results showed that boys in the single-sex class, who initially displayed lower academic results than all other groups, made significant gains in spelling, reading, and mathematics. There were significant differences in children’s emotional and behavioural engagement across the trial year, with girls in the mixed-sex class demonstrating reduced scores on these measures compared to children in the other classes.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 2002
References
Carpenter, P.C., & Hayden, M. (1987). Girls’ academic achievements: Single-sex versus coeducational schools in Australia. Sociology of Education, 60, 156–157.Google Scholar
Crump, S., & Moloney, E. (1994). Gender and the humanities: The view from the pupils. English in Australia, 107, 45–52.Google Scholar
Gwizdala, J., & Steinback, M. (1990). High school females’ mathematics attitudes: An interim report. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J. (1981). Sex differences in science examinations. In Kelly, A. (Ed.), The missing half: Girls and science education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, C., & Smith, I.D. (2000). Poles apart? An exploration of single-sex and mixed-sex educational environments in Australia and England. Educational Studies, 26(4), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, A. (1996). Single-sex settings: Pedagogies for girls and boys in Danish schools. In Murphy, P.F. & Gipps, C.V. (Eds.), Equity in the classroom: Towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys (pp. 173–191). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Kumagai, J. (1995). Do single-sex classes help girls succeed in physics? Physics Today, 48, 73–74.Google Scholar
Lee, E.V., & Bryk, A.S. (1986). Effects of single-sex secondary schools on achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 381–395.Google Scholar
Lee, V.E., & Lockheed, M.E. (1990). The effects of single-sex schooling on achievement and attitudes in Nigeria. Comparative Education Review, 34(2), 209–231.Google Scholar
Mael, F.A. (1998). Single-sex and coeducational schooling: Relationships to socioemotional and academic development. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 101–129.Google Scholar
Marsh, H.W. (1989). Effects of attending single-sex and coeducational high schools on achievement, attitudes, behaviors, and sex differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 70–85.Google Scholar
Marsh, H.W., & Rowe, K.J. (1996). The effects of single-sex and mixed-sex mathematics classes within a coeducational school: A reanalysis and comment. Australian Journal of Education, 40(2), 147–162.Google Scholar
Marsh, H.W., Smith, I.D., Myers, M.R., & Owens, L. (1988). The transition from single-sex to coeducational high schools: Effects on multiple dimensions of self-concept and on academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 237–269.Google Scholar
Moore, M. (1993). Conference summary. In Hollinger, D.K. (Ed.), Single-sex schooling: Perspectives from practice and research (pp. 69–74). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Office of Naval Research (1998). Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls. Washington, DC: Office of Naval Research.Google Scholar
Parker, L.H., & Rennie, L.J. (1997). Teachers’ perceptions of the implementation of single-sex classes in coeducational schools. Australian Journal of Education, 41(2), 119–133.Google Scholar
Riordan, C. (1985). Public and catholic schooling: The effects of gender context policy. American Journal of Education, 5, 518–540.Google Scholar
Rowe, K.J. (1988). Single-sex and mixed-sex classes: The effect of class type on student achievement, confidence, and participation in mathematics. Australian Journal of Education, 32(2), 180–202.Google Scholar
Schleiger, H. (1987). Diagnostic Mathematics Survey Test for Prep to Year 6 (3rd ed.). Burwood, Victoria: Victoria College Press.Google Scholar
Scott, A.C. (1991). A girls-only science class in a co-educational secondary school. Unpublished MA Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Subotnik, R.F., & Strauss, S.M. (1995). Gender differences in classroom participation and achievement. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6(2), 77–85.Google Scholar
Syal, R., & Trump, S. (1996). Single-sex classes raise boys’ grades. The Times, 25 August.Google Scholar
Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. (1991). Teacher Report of Engagement Questionnaire: A teacher-report measure of student motivation in the classroom. New York: University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Woodward, L.J., Fergusson, D.M., & Horwood, L.J. (1999). Effects of single-sex and coeducational schooling on children’s academic achievement. Australian Journal of Education, 43(2), 142–156Google Scholar
Young, D.J., & Fraser, B.J. (1990). Science achievement of girls in single-sex and co-educational schools. Research in Science & Technological Education, 8(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar