Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:49:06.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preferences of High Ability (Gifted) Students in Special and Mainstreamed Classes for Particular Teacher Characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Janet Williams
Janet Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Education, Nedlands Campus Western Australian College of Advanced Education
Get access

Abstract

Despite the critical importance of the teacher in any learning environment, there has been relatively little research into the characteristics of effective teachers of high ability (gifted) students. The majority of studies report the view of ‘experts’ rather than judgements made by the students themselves.

In this study, a modified version of the Student Perception of Teachers (SPOT) rating scale was used to measure the relative importance to gifted students of personal-social, cognitive and classroom management characteristics of teachers.

The sample consisted of two groups of high ability students in years 8,9 and 10 at government senior high schools in Western Australia. One group had been selected to participate in an academic extension programme and therefore the students were in special classes; the other consisted of students of similar ability, but attending the regular school programme.

Similarities and differences in the preferences of the mainstreamed and special groups are outlined, and findings compared with the results of two similar studies carried out in lsrael and the USA, but using only students in special programmes.

lmplications for the selection and training of teachers of high ability students are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , May 1988 , pp. 32 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, W.E. (1986). Successful Teachers of the Gifted. Exceptional Children, Vol 34: 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. (1983). Growing Up Gifted, (2nd ed). CE. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Gallagher, JJ. (1975). Teaching The Gifted Child, (2nd ed). Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
Khatena, J. (1982) Educational Psychology of the Gifted. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Maddux, CD., Samples-Lachmann, I., & Cummings, R.E. (1985). Preferences of Gifted Students for Selected Teacher Characteristics’ Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol 29 No. 4: 160–163.Google Scholar
Milgram, R.M. (1979). Perceptions of teacher behaviour in gifted and non-gifted children. Journal of Educational Psychology Vol 71(1), 125–128.Google Scholar
Newland, T.E. (1976). The Gifted in Socio-Educational Perspective. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Poole, M. (1983) Adolescent Perceptions of Teachers and School Subjects. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, Vol 11, No. 2.Google Scholar
Povey, R. (Ed) (1980). Educating the Gifted Child. Harper and Row Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Tuttle, F.B. Jr & Becker, L.A. (1980). Characteristics and Identification of Gifted and Talented Students. N.E.A. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar