Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:14:36.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Differences in Physical Self-Descriptions of Adolescents with a History of Motor Learning Difficulties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Dawne Larkin  and
Helen E. Parker
Dawne Larkin*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
Helen E. Parker
Affiliation:
The University of Western Australia
*
Department of Human Movement, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Little of the extensive research on gender differences in adolescent self-perception has addressed differences between boys and girls with coordination difficulties. This study of physical self-perception examined 16 boys and 16 girls ranging in age from 13 to 15 years, who had been identified as poorly coordinated during their primary school years. The Physical Self-Description Questionnaire completed by each participant provided scale scores for Appearance, Body Fat, Strength, Coordination, Endurance, Flexibility, Physical Activity, Sports Competence, Health, Global Physical, and Self-Esteem. As a group, the girls ranked their perceptions of Physical Activity and Endurance significantly lower than the boys did. The gender differences were somewhat different from those found in adolescents drawn from general populations.

Keywords

AdolescenceGenderPhysical Self-PerceptionPhysical Self-Description QuestionnaireMotor Cooordination
Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 63 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
Cantell, M., Smyth, M., & Ahonen, T. P. (1994). Clumsiness in adolescence: Educational, motor, and social outcomes of motor delay detected at 5 years. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 77, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. Causgrove, & Watkinson, E. J. (1994). A study of the relationship between physical awkwardness and children’s perceptions of physical competence. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 77, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cermak, S. (1985). Developmental dyspraxia. In Roy, E. A. (Ed.), Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders (pp. 225–248). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Conrad, K. E., Cermak, S. A., & Drake, C. (1983). Differentiation of praxis among children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 466–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cratty, B. J., Ikeda, N., Martin, M. M., Jennet, C., & Morris, M. (1970). Movement activities, motor ability, and the education of children (pp. 544). Springfield, ILL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Denckla, M. B., & Roeltgen, D. P. (1992). Disorders of motor function and control. In Rapin, I. & Segalowitz, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology: Vol. 6. Child neuropsychology (pp. 455–476). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Dewey, D., & Kaplan, B. J. (1994). Subtyping of developmental motor deficits. Developmental Neuropsychology, 10, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, A. M., & Polatajko, H. J. (Eds.). (1994, October). The London consensus. In Children and clumsiness: An international consensus meeting. London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Fox, K. R., & Corbin, C. B. (1989). The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 408–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greendorfer, S. L., Lewko, J. H., & Rosengren, K. S. (1996). Family and gender-based influences on sport socialisation of children and adolescents. In Smoll, F. L. & Smith, R. E. (Eds.), Children and youth in sport: A biopsychosocial perspective (pp. 89–111). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. J. (1986). Physical activity and self-esteem development in children: A meta-analysis. In Stull, G. A. & Eckert, H. (Eds.), American Academy of Physical Education Papers: Vol 19. Effects of physical activity on children (pp. 30–48). Champaign, ILL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
Hoare, D., & Larkin, D. (1991). Coordination problems in children. State of the Art Review (No. 18). Canberra: National Sports Research Centre, Australian Sports Commission.Google Scholar
Losse, A., Henderson, S. E., Elliman, D., Hall, D., Knight, E., & Jongmans, M. (1991). Clumsiness in children - Do they grow out of it? A ten year follow-up study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33,55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1996). Construct validity of Physical Self-Description Questionnaire responses: Relations to external criteria. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18,111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Richards, G. E., Johnson, S., Roche, L., & Tremayne, P. (1994). Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 270–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarron, L. T. (1982). MAND, McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development. Dallas, TX: Common Market Press.Google Scholar
Miyahara, M. (1994). Subtypes of students with learning disabilities based upon gross motor functions. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 368–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyahara, M., & Mobs, I. (1995). Developmental dyspraxia and developmental coordination disorder. Neuropsychology Review, 5, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polatajko, H., Fox, M., & Missiuna, C. (1995). An international consensus on children with developmental coordination disorder. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 3–6.Google Scholar
Rose, B., Larkin, D., & Berger, B. G. (in press). Coordination and gender influences on the perceived competence of children. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly.Google Scholar
Schoemaker, M. M., & Kalverboer, A. F. (1994). Social and affective problems of children who are clumsy : How early do they begin? Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11,130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, D. H., Moyes, F. A., & Henderson, S. E. (1972). The Test of Motor Impairment. Ontario: Brook Educational.Google Scholar
Symes, K. (1972). Clumsiness and the sociometric status of intellectually gifted boys. Bulletin of Physical Education, 9, 35–41.Google Scholar