Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:35:38.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Grade Repetition on the Social/Emotional Adjustment of Infants and Primary Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Dianna Kenny
Dianna Kenny*
Affiliation:
Cumberland College of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The present study examined the effects of repetition on the social/emotional adjustment of students in grades one to five. Subjects (n = 122) were all selected by their schools for repetition at the end of the school year. Of these, 74 repeated the grade and the remaining 48 proceeded to the next grade because these students' parents rejected the schools' recommendations to repeat their children. All children were pre- and post-tested on a range of educational, behavioural and attitudinal measures from multiple perspectives (i.e. teachers, parents and students) to determine the social/emotional effects of repetition on students.

Although the repeated group showed a significant improvement in place in grade, analysis of variance yielded very few differences between repeated and promoted students on the academic measures. However, on the social/emotional measures, repeated students were judged by teachers to have better fine and gross motor control, to be achieving better, to be more socially adjusted and more emotionally mature than promoted students. Parents of repeaters rated achievement and attitude towards school as showing more positive change than parents of promoted students. It was concluded that, while repetition is of limited benefit in enhancing academic performance, the gains were sufficient to allow favourable comparisons of repeated students with their new peer groups, and to enhance repeated students' sense of competence and mastery which, in turn, positively influenced ratings on other aspects of social/emotional adjustment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , May 1989 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, L. (1974). Self-concept and need factors of inner city high school adolescents and drop-outs. Child Study Journal, 4 (1), 21–20.Google Scholar
Bocks, W.M. (1977). Non-promotion: “A Year to Grow?” Educational Leadership, 34 (5), 379–382.Google Scholar
Chansky, N.M. (1964). Progress of promoted and repeating Grade I failures. Journal of Experimental Education, 32 (3), 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, J.A. (1968). Study of the impact of grade retention on primary school children. Journal of Psychology, 70 (2), 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, M.J. (1977). Non-promotion and self-concept development. Phi Delta Kappan, November 205–206.Google Scholar
Haddad, W.D. (1979). Educational and economic effects of promotion and repetition practices. Staff Working Paper No. 319 World Bank, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Holmes, C.T. & Matthews, K.M. (1984). The effects of non-promotion on elementary and junior high school pupils: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 54 (2), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G.B. (1975). The research evidence on the effects of grade retention. Review of Educational Research, 45, 613–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D.T. (1985a). The effect of repetition on the academic performance of primary school repeaters. Australian Journal of Special Education, 9 (2), 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D.T. (1985b). Patterns of grade retention in N.S.W. primary schools. Australian Journal of Remedial Educational (4), 158–164.Google Scholar
Kenny, D.T. (1987). Grade repetition in N.S.W. government primary schools: An evaluation of frequency, patterns and outcomes. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
Lebow, , Jay (1981). Issues in assessment of outcome in family therapy. Family Process, 20, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindelow, J. (1982). Synthesis of research on grade retention and social promotion. Educational Leadership, March 471–473.Google Scholar
McDaniel, E. (1973). McDaniel-Piers young children’s self-concept scale. West Lafayette. Purdue Educational Research Centre, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Ogden, K.W. (1971). An evaluation of non promotion as a method of improving academic performance. University of South California. Thesis Ed. D. Uni Microfilms, 71–21, 484.Google Scholar
Plummer, D., Lineberger, M.H. & Graziano, W.G. (1986). The academic and serial consequences of grade retention: A Convergent Analysis. In Katz, L.G. (Ed.), Current Topics in Early Childhood Education, Vol. 6, Norwood N.J.: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Sandin, A. (1944). Social and emotional adjustment of regularly promoted and non-promoted pupils. New York: Bureau of Publications Teachers College, Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rim, E.D. (1976). “How I Perceive Myself (H.I.P.M.)”. In Johnson, O.G. (Ed.), p.692–693, Tests and measurements in child development: Handbook II, Vol. 2, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Rose, J., Medway, F., Cantrell, V. & Marus, S. (1983). A fresh look at the retention promotion controversy. Journal of School Psychology, 21, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, B.A. & Ames, L.B. (1969). Improved academic, personal and social adjustment in selected primary school repeaters. The Elementary School Journal, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. & Howard, J. (1973). Failure to be promoted and self-concept among elementary school children. Elementary School Guidance and Counselling, 7, 182–187.Google Scholar
Worth, W.H. (1959). The effect of promotion and non promotion on pupil achievement and social personal development in the elementary school. University of Illinois, Thesis Ed.D. University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K. (1980). Children under stress: The causes and cures. In Family Weekly, Ogden Standard Examiner, 6–8.Google Scholar