Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:25:55.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Testing of Educational Minorities: A Search for Alternatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2016

Graham Davidson
Graham Davidson*
Affiliation:
Darwin Community College
*
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Darwin Community College, P.O. Box 40146, Casuarina. N.T. 5792
Get access

Extract

This article is directed at both academic and practitioner psychologists. My reflections on the mythology that surrounds the application of intelligence tests and their educational equivalents in schools are directed at the former group, of which I am one. These beliefs persist partly because current developments in psychological theory generally have had very little impact on the practice of cognitive testing and even less impact on educational testing (Davidson, 1982a). When doubts are raised about testing of minority group children practitioners are often told simply that current testing procedures are inappropriate but are not told about alternative assessment procedures and the advantages and difficulties they impose.

A second aim therefore is to explore some of the alternatives. For that reason the title refers to “cognitive” assessment rather than to intellectual or educational assessment, the aim being to consider the contributions of cognitive science generally and cross-cultural cognitive psychology particularly to the development of alternative assessment procedures. It also refers deliberately to “educational” minorities rather than cultural minorities, because some of these principles apply equally to social minorities whose home circumstances and educational needs are different from those of the majority, and to groups that form cultural majorities but whose access to education is restricted by a politically dominant cultural minority.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , November 1984 , pp. 39 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, G., Testing for order and control: IQ and social class. Radical Education Dossier, 1977, 4, 12–14.Google Scholar
Archer, D., Oppenheimer, R.S., Karetu, T.S., & St.George, R. Intelligence and the Pakeha child. National Education, 1971, 53 (No. 557), 258–260.Google Scholar
Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T. & Madaus, G.F. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
Bohem, A.E. Criteria-referenced assessment for the teacher. Teachers College Record, 1973, 75, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J.D. Human cognition: Learning, understanding and remembering. California: Wadsworth, 1979.Google Scholar
Brislin, R.W., Lonner, W.J. & Thorndike, R.M. Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Broadfoot, P. Assessment and development: Some theoretical and practical issues. International Journal of Educational Development, 1982, 2, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budhoff, M. Treasuring learning potential: An alternative to the traditional intelligence test. In Gredler, G.P. (Ed.) Ethical and legal factors in the practice of school psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. Planning meals: Problem solving on a real data-base. Cognition, 1977, 5, 287–332.Google Scholar
Ciborowski, T. The role of context, skill, and transfer in cross-cultural experimentation. In Triandis, H. & Berry, J. (eds), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Volume 2. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980.Google Scholar
Cole, M. An ethnographic psychology of cognition. In Brislin, R. Bochner, S. & Lonner, W. (Eds), Cross-cultural perspectives on learning. New York: Halsted Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Cole, M. & Scribner, S. Cross-cultural studies of memory and cognition. In Kail, R.V. & Hagen, J.W. (Eds), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. New York: Wiley, 1977.Google Scholar
Das, J.P., Kirby, J.R. & Jarman, R. Simultaneous and successive cognitive processes. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Davidson, G.R. An ethnographic psychology of Aboriginal cognitive ability. Oceania, 1979, 49, 270–294.Google Scholar
Davidson, G.R. Educational assessment of socially and culturally different children. International Journal of Educational Development, 1982, 2, 153–162, a.Google Scholar
Davidson, G.R. Cultural variation in minority test performance. Australian Psychologist, 1982, 17, 216–218, b.Google Scholar
Davidson, G.R. Participant involvement and control in cross-cultural research: The case of Australian Aborigines. In Nixon, M.C. (Ed.), Issues in psychological practice. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1984.Google Scholar
Davidson, G.R. & Klich, L.Z. Ethnography, cognitive processes and instructional procedures. In Kirby, J.R. (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance. New York: Academic Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Dove, A. “The Chilting Test”. Newsweek, 1968, 15 July.Google Scholar
Findley, W.G. Grouping for instruction. In Miller, L.P. (Ed.), The testing of Black students. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
Flavell, J.H. Developmental studies of mediated memory. In Reese, H.W. & Lipsitt, L.P (Eds), Advances in child development and behaviour. Volume 5. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Fulcher, D. The function of the conception and evaluation of intellect in efforts at social change. In Kearney, G.E. & McElwain, D.W. (Eds), Aboriginal cognition: Retrospect and prospect. New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Fitzgerald, D. The use of confirmatory factor analysis in the evaluation of intelligence test models. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, San Francisc, April, 1979.Google Scholar
Hegarty, S. & Lucas, D. Able to learn: The pursuit of culture-fair assessment. Berkshire: NFER Publishing Company, 1978.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. & Willmot, E. A thousand Aboriginal teachers by 1990. In Sherwood, J. (Ed.), Aboriginal education: Issues and innovations. Perth: Creative Research, 1982.Google Scholar
Irvine, S. & Carroll, W. Testing and assessment across cultures: Issues in methodology and theory. In Triandis, H.C. and Berry, J.W. (Eds), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980.Google Scholar
Klich, L.Z. & Davidson, G.R. A cultural difference in visual memory: on le voit, on ne le voit plus. International Journal of Psychology, 1983, 18, 189–201.Google Scholar
Klich, L.Z. & Davidson, G.R. Toward a recognition of Australian Aboriginal competence in cognitive functions. In Kirby, J.R. (Ed.), Cognitive strategies and educational performance. New York: Academic Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Labov, W. The logic of Non-standard English. In Keddie, N. (Ed.), Tinker, Tailor: The myth of cultural deprivation. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.Google Scholar
Labov, W. Academic ignorance and Black intelligence. In Maehr, M.L. & Stallings, W.M. (Eds), Culture, child and school. Monterey: Brooks Cole, 1975.Google Scholar
Lennon, R.T. The testing of Black students: Dilemmas for test publishers. In Miller, L.P. (Ed.), The testing of Black students. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
McElwain, D.W. & Kearney, G.E. Queensland test handbook. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, 1970.Google Scholar
Mercer, J.R. Labelling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Mercer, J.R. Latent functions of intelligence testing in public schools. In Miller, L.P. (Ed.), The testing of Black students. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
Mercer, J.R. & Lewis, F.J. SOMPA. System of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1977.Google Scholar
Miller, L.P. The testing of Black students. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
Nerlove, S.B. & Snipper, A.S. Cognitive consequences of cultural opportunity. In Monroe, R.H. Monroe, R.L. & Whiting, B.B. Handbook of Cross-cultural human development. New York: Garland Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Popham, W.J. Modern educational measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. Schooling and the development of cognitive skills. In Triandis, H.C. and Heron, A. (Eds), Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Volume 4, Developmental Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980.Google Scholar
Scribner, A. Situating the experiment in cross-cultural research. In Riegel, K.F. & Meacham, J.A. (Eds), The developing individual in a changing world. Chicago: Aldine, 1976.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. & Cole, M. Cognitive consequences of formal and informal education. Science, 1973, 182, 553–559.Google Scholar
Segall, M. Cross-cultural psychology. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole, 1979.Google Scholar
Smith, K.K. A validation of the Queensland Test. Unpublished Honours Thesis. Brisbane: University of Queensland Library, 1966.Google Scholar
Wiley, D.E. Another day, another hour: Quantity of schooling, a potent path for policy. In Sewell, W.H. Schooling and achievement in American society. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wyatt, G.E. Alternatives to the use of standardised tests with Afro-American children. In Bass, B.A. Wyatt, G.E. & Powell, G.J. (Eds), The Afro-American family: Assessment, treatment and research issues. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1982.Google Scholar