Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:01:04.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Development of Children with Birthweights Under 1500 Grams: Intelligence Test Scores and Socioeconomic Status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Anne J. Dezoete  and
Barton A. Macarthur
Anne J. Dezoete*
Affiliation:
Child Development Unit, National Women's Hospital, Auckland
Barton A. Macarthur
Affiliation:
Child Development Unit, National Women's Hospital, Auckland
*
Child Development Unit, National Women's Hospital, Private Bag 92189, Auckland
Get access

Abstract

This study of 123 children who weighed under 1500 grams at birth examined cognitive ability and behaviour at 4 years of age, in conjunction with two categories of birthweight and parental socioeconomic status, respectively. Analysis revealed a number of significant differences between the two birthweight groups, with children under 1000 grams performing less well on some WPPSI Scales. These effects of preterm birth, in turn, appeared to be further influenced by socioeconomic status.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , May 1995 , pp. 18 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aylward, G.P., Pfeiffer, S.I., Wright, A., & Verhulst, S.J. (1989). Outcome studies of low birth weight infants published in the last decade: A meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatrics, 115 (4), 515–520.Google Scholar
Eilers, B.L., Desai, N.S., Wilson, M.A., & Cunningham, M.D. (1986). Classroom performance and social factors of children with birth weights of 1,250 grams or less: Follow-up at 5 to 8 years of age. Pediatrics, 77(2), 203–8.Google Scholar
Elley, W.B., & Irving, J.C. (1985). The Elley-Irving Socio-Economic Index 1981 Census Revision. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 20 (2), 129–139.Google Scholar
Escalona, S.K. (1982). Babies at double hazard: Early development of infants at biologic and social risk. Pediatrics, 70 (5), 670–676.Google Scholar
Escobar, G.J., Littenberg, B., & Petitti, D.B. (1991). Outcome among surviving very low birthweight infants: A meta-analysis. Archives of Diseases in Childhood, 66, 204–211.Google Scholar
Gorden, B.N., & Jens, K.G. (1988). A conceptual model for tracking high-risk infants and making early service decisions. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 9, 279–86.Google Scholar
Huck, S W., Cormier, WH., & Bounds, W.G. (1974). Reading statistics and research (pp. 49–73). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hunt, J.V., Cooper, B.A., & Tooley, W.H. (1988). Very low birth weight infants at 8 and 11 years of age: Role of neonatal illness and family status. Pediatrics, 82 (4), 596–603.Google Scholar
Hunt, J.V., Tooley, W.H., & Harvin, D. (1982). Learning disabilities in children with birth weights ≤ 1500 grams. Seminars in Perinatology, 6 (4), 200–287.Google ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, W.H., Doyle, L.W., Ford, G.W., Murton, L.J., Keith, C.G., Rickards, A.L., Kelly, E., & Callanan, C. (1991). Changing two-year outcome of infants weighing 500 to 999 grams at birth: A hospital study. Journal of Pediatrics, 118 (6), 938–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klebanov, P.K., Brooks-Gunn, J., & McCormick, M.C. (1994). Classroom behavior of very low birth weight elementary school children. Pediatrics, 94, 700–708.Google Scholar
Klein, N.K. (1988). Children who were very low birthweight: Cognitive abilities and classroom behavior at five years of age. The Journal of Special Education, 22 (1), 41–54.Google Scholar
McCormick, M.C., Gortmaker, S.L., & Sobol, A.M. (1990). Very low birth weight children: Behavior problems and school difficulty in a national sample. Journal of Pediatrics, 117 (5), 687–93.Google Scholar
Marlow, N., Roberts, L., & Cooke, R. (1993). Outcome at 8 years for children with birth weights of 1250g or less. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 68, 286–290.Google Scholar
Ornstein, M., Ohlsson, A., Edmonds, J., & Asztalos, E. (1991). Neonatal follow-up of very low birthweight/extremely low birthweight infants to school age: A critical overview. Acta Paediatric Scand, 80 (8–9), 741–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sameroff, A.J., & Chandler, M.J. (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In Horowitz, F.D. (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4, pp. 187–244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sattler, J.M. (1992). Assessment of children (rev. and updated 3rd ed.). San Diego:Jerome M. Sattler.Google Scholar
Schraeder, B.D., Heverly, M.A., O’Brien, C., & McEvoy-Shields, K. (1992). Finishing first grade: A study of school achievement in very-low-birth-weight children. Nursing Research, 41 (6), 354–361.Google Scholar
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 102–223). New York : McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Stewart, A.L. (1989). Outcome. In Harvey, D. Cooke, R.W. & Levitt, G.A. (Eds.), The baby under 1000g (pp. 331–339). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
The Scottish Low Birthweight Study: II (1992). Language attainment, cognitive status, and behavioral problems. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 67 (5), 682–686.Google Scholar
Thorndike, R.L., Hagen, E.P., & Sattler, J.M. (1986). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition. Chicago: The Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Underhill-Sem, Y. (1988). Fertility patterns in the Auckland region 1981–1986. Unpublished manuscript, Auckland Area Health Board Strategic Planning Unit, Auckland.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1967). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Zubrick, S.R., Macartney, H., & Stanley, F.J. (1988). Hidden handicap in school-age children who received neonatal intensive care. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 30, 145–152.Google Scholar