Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:02:51.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classwide Peer Tutoring: A Comparison of “Tutor Huddle” and Teacher-Directed Procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Elaine Chapman  and
David Leach
Elaine Chapman*
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
David Leach
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
*
Psychology Section, School of Social Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150.
Get access

Abstract

A 12-week classwide peer tutoring program in multiplication based on the “tutor huddle” procedure was compared with a conventional teacher-directed procedure. Two sixth-grade classes (n=52) were divided into higher and lower achievers on the basis of an initial multiplication pretest. The higher-achieving members (n=26) were then randomly assigned to be either tutor huddle tutors or teacher-directed tutors. The remaining class members (n=26) were randomly assigned to be either tutor huddle tutees or teacher-directed tutees. Results indicated that the tutor huddle tutors made significantly greater gains in multiplication skills than the teacher-directed tutors. There was no significant difference in the gains made by the two tutee groups. Benefits of the tutor huddle procedure for tutors and practical implications for its use in classroom settings were discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , November 1991 , pp. 2 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bargh, J.A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boraks, , Nancy, , & Allen, Amy R. (1977). A program to enhance peer tutoring. The Reading Teacher, 30(5), 479–484.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jiska. (1986). Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 175–185.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5(4), 331–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, H.C., Shute, Rosalyn H., Morgan, Michelle J., & Barron, Ann-Marie. (1990). Theoretical issues in peertutoring. In Foot, H.C.Morgan, M.J. and Shute, R.H. (Eds.), Children Helping Children. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Greenwood, C.R., Carta, Judith J., & Vance-Hall, R. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17(2), 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R.V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J., & Aldridge, J. (1983). Ten reasons why peer tutoring won’t work. Academic Therapy, 19(1), 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedin, Diane. (1987). Students as teachers: A tool for improving school climate and productivity. Social Policy, 52, 42–47.Google Scholar
Heward, W.L., Heron, T.E., & Cooke, N.L. (1982). Tutor Huddle: Key element in a classwide peertutoring program. The Elementary School Journal, 83(2) 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.R., & Jenkins, Linda M. (1987). Making peer tutoring work. Educational Leadership, 56, 64–68.Google Scholar
Leach, D.J. (1984). Arithmetic in Steps: A Task-Analysed Sequence of Practice Exercises. Perth: Author.Google Scholar
Leach, D.J., & Gardiner, J. (1989). The Maths Master Diagnostic Arithmetic Test. Perth: Author.Google Scholar
Maheady, LM & Harper, G.F. (1987). A classwide peer tutoring system in a secondary resource room program for the mildly handicapped. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21(3) 76–83.Google Scholar
Topping, K. (1988). The Peer Tutoring Handbook: Promoting Cooperative Learning. London, England: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Topping, K. (1989). Peertutoring and paired reading: Combining two powerful techniques. The Reading Teacher, 62, 488–494.Google Scholar